Tiger Shaw

Disagree, I was talking about Maverick , I thought he started the thread. Apologies to Thermo

.

I Cant believe Longmuir is lapping up the bucket loads of shite he's being spoon fed by Liewell and his evil puppets Some people say Longmuir should be the chairman of the new body when the SPL and SFL merge... He's being played for a fool, by fools

That was another SPL lie https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BB89ZgqCIAAM-zb.jpg:large

Like Bill said 'Some of us know we are in a war' Some of our fans need to get their head around that fact. Nobody has ever won a war by sniping at their own side.

Daddy's uniform is obviously about the 36th division who fought at the somme as part of the British army, Here lies a soldier it could be argued some are singing about the modern day UVF but ether way Rangers fans who like to give it the we're as bad as them line do my fucking tits in . Also can't remember when the last time I heard any of the mentioned songs sang at a Rangers match.

.

How many of their titles are tainted is a better question ...If the Mhutants manage to steal our titles and award them to themselfs, you can forget about the greatest rocknroll swindle, this will go down as the greatest swindle in living memory. Add that to their even more vile acts of covering up child abuse at the club for 20 years Not to mention their support of Nazi Germany during the war and their support of Irish Spanish and Islamic terrorists. What a horrible gang of rabid head fucked mhutants they really are. Horrible fucking club. They can stick their tainted titles up their arse. Cheating bastards.

Men hand picked by Liewell to carry out his agenda, kick Rangers down and keep on kicking, meanwhile Septic get a free run at the title and pocket all the CL riches ... In a strange kind of twisted Timmy agenda way the men leading Scottish football down the path to oblivion are playing a blinder. That could soon change if the SFL boot out the 12 12 18 shite and we get a positive outcome at Skippy's kangaroo court. Seems unlikely but ye never know... If these two things go our way then I think heads will start to roll in the slimy corridors of Hampden.

http://www.clydefc.co.uk/news/2013/0...EjGHUQ.twitter Club Statement: League Talks Tue, 29th Jan 2013 11:30pm Clyde FC representatives will be attending this Thursday's SFL meeting, where the main agenda item will be the proposed plans for league reconstruction, including details on governance and the distribution model. The club has been informed that no formal vote will take place at Thursday's meeting, but rather the day is an opportunity for all SFL clubs to discuss the proposal in depth and find out the latest developments on the subject. We trust that the meeting at Hampden will provide us with the necessary clarity to allow the club to make an informed decision. We are particularly interested in the detail behind the proposed voting arrangements and the arguments for larger leagues which, although dismissed as not being competitive enough for top clubs due to the prospect of meaningless games, is deemed suitable for eighteen other clubs. Prior to any formal vote the club will consult with its owners in order to ascertain their views on the proposed fundamental changes to the structure of the game.

United fans’ group wants to see more detail before league reconstruction vote Representatives of ArabTRUST have met with Dundee United chairman Stephen Thompson to discuss the ongoing league reconstruction. Following constructive discussions, the trust advised the club that it was not in favour of rushing through the introduction of all of the proposed changes this summer. “We believe that within the overall proposals to reconstruct the leagues there are some good principles, such as the redistribution of wealth and the simplification of the governing bodies,” a trust spokesman said. “We see no reason why these should not be undertaken at the earliest opportunity. “However, we think it is grossly unfair that clubs are being asked to vote on this matter, when little detail or any alternatives have been provided, and where it appears to be a take it or leave it scenario.” The spokesman added that it was felt to be imperative that further detail is provided to fans on the league reconstruction proposals. “How can we propose to buy season tickets for 2013/14 when we have no idea who we are going to see for the entire price we are paying?” he added. “Given that clubs — and supporters — have not been offered any alternative structures to consider, or any vision on the longer-term shape of Scottish football, we call on the SFA to provide leadership by bringing a period of reflection and detailed consultation before any decision is made. “As we have said before, supporters are the lifeblood of the game and whilst the authorities have mostly failed to listen to date, we are encouraged that United have listened to our views.” The trust has also called on United fans to get right behind the team. “The level of success is crucial to the playing budget that will be available to our new manager,” said the spokesman.

Rangers Supporters Trust statement on reconstruction The Rangers Supporters Trust are disappointed but unsurprised that the SPL clubs have decided to show total disregard to football supporters, and unanimously back a reconstruction proposal which has serious question marks over it's viability. At the moment there is no sponsor and there are serious concerns over the future of the current broadcasting deal. Back in October Neil Doncaster reported that the SPL was adapting remarkably well without Rangers. Given this prosperity, one would question the need to rush the proposal through for the beginning of next season, especially when there are so many unanswered questions. We can only hope that our fellow SFL clubs are able to display the integrity, transparency and common sense so sadly lacking from their SPL counterparts, and treat this proposal with the same level of contempt as the SPL have shown football supporters. In the summer the directors of many SPL clubs stated how important it was to listen to fans - yet there would appear to be an almost universal rejection amongst fans of all clubs against 12-12-18. We also note statements in recent times from the Dundee United Chairman and the Celtic CEO concerning the unsuitability changing of the rules of a competition during a season. FOR INFO: "You can’t ignore fans. Any business which ignores its customers is doomed to fail". Stephen Thompson, Dundee United. 9th June 2012. "However, the league must not be compromised by changing the rules during the course of the competition and these decisions should not be made on an ad-hoc basis". Peter Lawell, Celtic FC. 22nd April 2008. http://therst.co.uk/

The specific rules allegedly breached SPL rule D9.3 states all payments made to players for playing football must be registered. It says: "No player may receive any payment of any description from or on behalf of a club in respect of that player’s participation in Association Football or in an activity connected with Association Football, other than in reimbursement of expenses actually incurred or to be actually incurred in playing or training for that Club, unless such payment is made in accordance with a Contract of Service between that Club and the Player concerned." The second rule under scrutiny is D1.13 which states that all contracts must be lodged with the governing body. It says: "A club must, as a condition of registration and for a Player to be eligible to play in official matches, deliver the executed originals of all contracts of service and amendments and/or extensions to contracts of service and all other agreements providing for payment, other than for reimbursement of expenses actually incurred, between that club and player, to the secretary, within fourteen days of such contract of service or other agreement being entered into, amended and/or, as the case may be, extended." http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/r...h-case-begins/

Lifted from Gersnet Upon determining that a breach of or failure to fulfil the Rules has been established, the Board or, as the case may be, a Commission may:- G6.1.1 give a warning as to future conduct; G6.1.2 give a reprimand; G6.1.3 impose a fine; G6.1.4 annul the result of an Official Match; G6.1.5 order that an Official Match be replayed; G6.1.6 impose a deduction of points; G6.1.7 award an Official Match (with such deemed score as it thinks appropriate) to a Club; G6.1.8 order the playing of an Official Match or Matches behind closed doors; G6.1.9 order the closure of all or part of a Stadium for such period and for such purposes as it thinks appropriate; G6.1.10 order the playing of an Official Match or Matches at such Stadium as it thinks appropriate; G6.1.11 subject to Rule G6.3, order that a Club be expelled from the League; G6.1.12 withdraw or withhold the award of a title or award; G6.1.13 order any Club, Club Official or Player to pay compensation to any Club, Player, person or party; G6.1.14 order any Club, Club Official or Player to comply with any obligation or direction; G6.1.15 cancel or refuse the Registration of any Player Registered or attempted to be Registered; G6.1.16 order that a Club concerned be debarred from Registering Players for such period as it thinks appropriate; G6.1.17 order that any person, persons or group of persons be prohibited from attending at such Official Match or Matches and for such period as it thinks appropriate; G6.1.18 make such other direction, sanction or disposal, not expressly provided for in these Rules, as it shall think appropriate; and/or G6.1.19 make such order as to expenses, including the expenses of the Board and/or, as the case may be, Commission and/or other party, as it thinks appropriate. G6.2 When imposing a direction, sanction or disposal the Board or, as the case may be a Commission, may apply such number and combination of the directions, sanctions and/or disposals provide for in Rule G.1 as it thinks appropriate, may make such provision for time to comply with any one or more of same as it thinks appropriate, may defer for such period or until such event as it shall think appropriate the decision on or imposition of a sanction or sanctions and shall be entitled to suspend the effect of any such direction, sanction or disposal for such period and/or on such conditions as it thinks appropriate

3-2 win for Rangers ... GET INTAE THEM!!!

And when the two leagues of 12 become three leagues of eight, Rangers will then be playing in the 4th tier just like we are now and against the same teams, you do realise that ?

85. RESTRICTION ON DISSOLUTION It shall not be competent to resolve to wind up the League with the purpose or effect of then re-forming a National Association Football League within three years of the date of the resolution to wind up which shall exclude any club formerly in membership of the League or which shall exclude a club formerly in membership of the League from being promoted to a higher division of such League where it had a legitimate expectation of such promotion when a member of the League, unless such club shall consent in writing to such exclusion; and in the event of such a resolution being passed and such circumstances arising within the said three year period such resolution shall be null and void and treated as such ab initio. http://www.scottishfootballleague.co...1346425915.pdf

Probably not anywhere else on British soil but you can be rest assured armed forces day would be banned from Scottish football grounds. Fixed that Baxterboy

Earth sometimes ... says it all, I'm out .

Probably not anywhere else on British soil but you can be rest assured armed forces day would be banned from Scottish football grounds. You must be living on another planet if you don't think that would be the only outcome of holding Armed forces day at Ibrox on the same day Rangers play the Dhims.

When we hold our armed forces day I want they rabid bheast nowhere near Ibrox . Fun? you must be fucking joking, the Dhims would cause mayhem, and armed forces day would be banned forever more.

Memo for the SPL kangaroo court... “We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.” Winston Churchill Come ahead ya bass ....

SUNDAY, 27 JANUARY 2013 14:30 Club Statement WRITTEN BY RANGERS FOOTBALL CLUB FOLLOWING an article in today's Sunday Mail the club has issued the following statement: Rangers have always had a close and respectful relationship with this country’s services personnel and associated charities. That will continue. No one from any of the Forces has been in contact with us other than to thank us for our support and help. Indeed, it was pointed out that our Remembrance event proved to be the single largest memorial event in Scotland in the year in question. The Remembrance part of the afternoon was observed impeccably and carried precisely the correct degree of solemnity. This was, as should always be the case, entirely separate from anything that some might have deemed frivolous during half time an hour or so later. That was when service people about to be deployed abroad wanted to celebrate in normal football style. All activities on the day were arranged in full co-operation with the Royal Navy, RAF and Army. They have always been extremely appreciative of the club’s efforts and acknowledge we are massive supporters of the country’s serving men and women, as well as veterans