ralphiebrand

I have thought for a while now that Peter Lawwell will not be satisfied until blood is flowing on the streets of Glasgow. I don't say that lightly, it's a genuine belief I have that that man, for reasons of his own, wants to provoke sectarian violence in Glasgow. It's not the sfa who should be looking at him, it's the police.

If the events after the final whistle that night had involved the yahoo support, it would have been portrayed as brave young men standing up to and routing Franco's paramilitary police force. There would have been stories and poems written in praise. Ballads would still be sung today celebrating the actions of those noble working-class heroes. The celtic support would actually claim credit for the eventual fall of Franco the Fascist - they started the ball rolling in Barcelona that night etc etc. But because it was Rangers supporters involved, it was not brave young working-class lions, it was drunken hooligans, thugs, it was "a riot - a disgrace that shamed Scotland" etc. Maybe it comes down to us not feeling the need to ingratiate ourselves with everybody else, but we are definitely slow on the uptake when it comes to PR.

"I remember 1988 when I was just nine years old and Mark Walters had signed for Rangers. I used to go and watch a lot of games back then because my brother was in the team. To this day I can still see those images in my head of bananas being thrown on to the pitch. I was a kid, I didn’t really understand what was going on. But looking back, it turns my stomach to think Scottish fans could have acted like that." Anyone who thinks that is a good article from Ferguson should have a real think about those comments above. Nowhere does the name Celtic appear in relation to the banana throwing, so the impression is given that it was Rangers supporters who threw bananas at Mark Walters. I don't know if Ferguson is trying to land himself a regular gig in the Scottish media, or his comments were edited and amended by someone at the Record, but yet again the truth about those disgusting yahoo b.astards is buried.

He might be middle aged in terms of birthdays, but emotionally and psychologically he's a twelve year old boy.

So someone makes a post highlighting the current social and political similarities betwen Scotland and Northern Ireland, and you class it as ranting and raving. Leaving aside the fact that you consider yourself to be an uber-cool dude who is on a much much higher level than the rest of us - when in reality you're just a fukkin little fruitcake - why would you feel the need to insult the guy who made the post? Do you have some sympathy for the views of Galloway and McGillivan etc, is there something in your background that makes you constantly and predictably rubbish people who criticise Roman Catholics?

The BBC in general has a singular world-view. In England, it has a left-liberal mindset: anti-Tory, pro-Labour, pro-immigration, pro-climate change. Opposing views are marginalised or given no exposure at all. This left-liberal culture also exists at BBC Scotland, but as the manager class at Pacific Quay appears to be exclusively Roman Catholic, a pro-Celtic, anti-Rangers agenda is added.

English has written that article for one reason and one reason only. He wants to keep Rangers supporters at each other's throats, and judging by some of the replies he is succeeding. English is a sly, Rangers-hating piece of Republican slime, and he should always be treated as such. Fuck him and the horse he rode in on.

The second sentence answers the point made in the first sentence. We can forget about "just getting back to the football" - that is not going to happen in the foreseeable future. There are just too many Rangers-haters in influential positions in Scotland and elsewhere, determined to hinder the Club as much as possible and keep it down as long as possible. It is these people who provide the information and encouragement to McGillivan and others who seem to spend their entire lives online plotting and campaigning to damage Rangers. Too many of the Rangers support don't realise we have been in the middle of a "Cold War" for a few years now, and we are losing.

I'll try to avoid living up to the big, bad, aggressive VB stereotype, so in sweetness and light, could you expand on that comment above. Because it sounds like something I might hear from a group of earnest, right-on wee students sitting in the pub either drunk or stoned. It is as laughable as it is nonsensical. Joe McCarthy was an American Senator who in the 1950's led a witchhunt against Communists working in Hollywood. I genuinely don't understand why you would use his name to reinforce your attack on VB?

See post above for "clarification". And he's some fukkin Rangers fan.

Let me just "clarify" that last sentence. It was not intended to be an insult; it is a statement of fact and irrefutable truth.

OK, then.

That statement reveals just how ignorant you really are. Vanguard Bears has one primary motive and that is to defend Rangers and Rangers supporters at all times. The statement released yesterday is further evidence of that. Why did you join VB a couple of years ago? You didn't last very long, funnily enough. You absolute little tit.

Because he is a Taig. It's what they do, and they're good at it.

"I have amended my article to ensure that Tom English gets the 'credit' he deserves. Sorry for the error". Just leave it as "Sam English" and if anybody queries it, explain that you were taking the piss out of the fenian b@stard by giving him the same name as a legendary Rangers player.

If that is indeed the case, why then did Mr Bagwaash not state clearly that he was specifically referring to some Rangers supporters who also supported Chelsea and England, and was not implying that the entire Rangers support is racist. That was all he had to do, and that would have ended it. He could then have slept peacefully last night without worrying about all those "threats" he received, the poor wee soul.

Politically, look for links between journalists and broadcasters and the Scottish Labour party. Research Steven Purcell, Willie Haughey, Jack and Bridget McConnell. Research how many Roman Catholics hold senior positions at BBC Scotland. As for sports journalists and commentators, just check who their favourite team is.

The VB'ers are wee scamps sometimes

An English right-wing newspaper who have Roddy Forsyth - a Rangers-hating, self-loathing celtic-supporting bastard - authoring the article.

So, are you saying that the VB member "shat it"? Was there a specific time and place arranged, and you were there all revved up and ready to rumble? I think you are fibbing, you naughty little pest.

Now who's acting the hardman, eh? "Oh, the irony" to quote your favourite riposte. You have been cordially invited to meet, on several occasions, individual members of the VB "sowing circle". How many times have you turned up. But hey, it's easy to dish it out when you're "safely behind a computer screen" isn't it?

I left FF because it was polluted by taigs. But you were well aware of that, because you were one of them. I'll ask you again: you'll be hoping for good news today, eh?

You'll be hoping for good news today, eh?

GeneralCustardCream has been polluting Rangers forums for years. He's never slow to give his fucked-up opinions, and that type of loudmouth usually likes to make himself known to others - but is there anybody who has ever actually met him, or seen him at Ibrox or elsewhere. If he is a Rangers man, then somebody, somewhere at some time must be able to provide proof of that. But nobody can, and that is because GeneralCustardCream is a taig, and he was indeed outed on FF years ago. "If it waddles like a taig, and quacks like a taig" .......