Rapid6

I wouldn't be so sure! But you'd like to think so.

Yip. Clearly!

I thought he would just resign to save his dignity. The plan? Carry on pouring money in and accepting the drivel we are being served. That's the plan. Keeps the board nice and happy at least!

Good motto, but the acronym nfnf would get the media in to a frenzy!

Unless certain clubs / people started shouting about sporting integrity. Remember, the rules don't necessarily matter when it comes to Glasgow Rangers - they can always be rewritten or mis-interpreted!

Young kids get bord easily, what's the point?

Why can't we hate them forever? They wanted to destroy us. Somehow we should let bygones be bygones! No fucking way! The bastards almost succeeded with the help of 10 other clubs (Kilmarnock abstained). Slanty eyes swaggering about as if he was the king of scottish football. Remember what rev Paisley said - Never Never Never.

About time too!

More like the mrs is home sick and wants to move back. Ha ha ha.

Think Irvine should have a say or right to defend himself before anyone votes!

The point is that a club in the bottom tier of scottish football with no debt etc etc frittered away 22million in 2 years and needs to ask for a loan of 1.5 million to keep the club running until the end of the season. Use the accounts figures to justify what you want but the bottom line is 22million is gone!

I'm glad Sandy Easdale is charging hee haw. That's how it looks anyway. Surely Rangers will use his money 1st before touching any of Laxey's? We have been stung before so please don't have a go at me for saying this, but if Easdale is true to his word and there are no back handers or hidden charges somewhere in his agreement - I think we may well have someone who will look after the club without the preconditioned thought of making a fast buck and buggering off! Time will tell, like it did with the previous cnuts in charge!

2012 - A Chance to rebuild and we raised 20 million pound to get started. Today - we are asking for 1.5 million and struggling against Stenhousemuir. Unacceptable!

I don't think independence will happen. The danger though is complacency. If everyone thinks there is no chance of independence they may not bother voting and the Nats may sneak it!

We could easily raise 136,968 pounds sterling.

Ibrox should have got it. Surely the SFA SPFL should be assisting member clubs as best they can. If it is so well known that rangers have financial difficulties the least they can do is help create more revenue for us. I think this decision shows undoubtedly how much they want to see Rangers fail. It's a one way street with them taking as much from us as possible (TV) and giving nothing back in return. I'm sure the bigoted delegation from the east end will be chuckling to themselves.

Source? Have a word with them!

So you do think supporting Rangers is all about giving them money? There is no doubt it is a big part, but what they are doing with it just now is not in the best interest of the club. You are supporting a select few's luxurious lifestyles more than Rangers. Look at the empty seats! Do all those people no longer support Rangers?

.....and once you start swearing at people and are unable to have a reasonable discussion - you've already lost the ability to be taken seriously! But, just to answer your question. I do not think that financing the current set up is supporting the team or club.

Of course, but loyalty sometimes leads to misguided trust. Glory hunters is used, IMHO, as a personal insult to those who have a different view and no longer believe in what the other person / people do! It's a bit weak really but I agree with the words, only the other way round. Hunters Glory. I want the best for the club and I want them to always be hunting glory. That's not what is happening at the moment! It's a bit ignorant just to label someone as a glory hunter, because they think differently!

I am supporting the club. In forcing their hand in order for them to progress. If you are of the opinion that pouring money in to the current set up is supporting the club, then carry on! As I said earlier...........others will be more sensible!

As many have. After last week, I decided to keep my 21 quid in my pocket today. The directors are too scared to make the crucial decision. The longer they leave it, the more the club (and the business) will suffer! Sooner or later something will need to give.

Looks like the fans can see what is going on - overspending and under achieving! Some people will support the club and the lifestyle it provides to the old pals / opportunists, no matter what. Others will be more sensible!

Please steer the club so I can get a big return on my investment! That's what he is really saying. I'm not disagreeing with him though. He has obviously seen that the club's current leadership is not performing and the fans are becoming less gullible, or more savvy? Old alliance's are beginning to harm our progress!

I am coming round to the idea that these guys may be good for Rangers. It is about time we forget about the scum journo's living off criticising Rangers. They are only hurting because we did not die. GIRUY's