Doughnut001

Cool. If the people damaging the club can't say a single thing in their defence other than random namecalling, it proves undoubtedly how wrong they are. So feel free to call me whatever you like. I'm a real rangers fan wheras you're obviously someone who doesn't mind damaging the club as long as they can sing about a battle that happened hundreds of years ago in a foreign country.

Nobody is saying all rangers fans support terrorists. Just that a sad little clique who call themselves rangers fans are terrorist lovers.

I take it you are one of the idiots trying to damage our club every week? Can you say a single thing in your defence or will you just resort to random namecalling?

There's nothing to suggest they are in support of football, have anything to do with Scotland or have anything to do with Rangers. I feel the same way about the dodgy songs as i do about flares and smoke bombs: They contribute absolutely ZERO to the team and damage the club because of any fines / arrests / bad publicity caused by them. You have no right whatsoever to call yourself a Rangers fan if you are actually damaging the club.

So if he called you a hate filled asshole, that would be fine? Seems like your holding the dude to a standard you couldn't possibly match yourself. How many real Rangers fans have you called taigs this week alone?

Murray oversaw the greatest period in Rangers' History. The club was about £30M in debt when he left so he lost about £1.5M per season. Did he make any real profits? Green lost WAY more than £1.5M and in less than a whole season AND paid himself a big fat bonus AND reportedly made over 3000% profit on his investment in under a year despite no evidence being exigent which says he invested a single penny in the club himself. So, they last word on Charles Green? CUNT!!!

The scum at HMRC have previously claimed that the reason they make tax deals with big companies like vodafone is that they don't think going after them properly is economically viable. I.e it would cost more than they would gain. There is no possible chance that an appeal of the tax case will do anything other than lose the taxpayer money.

Do you really think he writes the articles himself? Besides, someone who decided he was bigger than the club and decided it was OK for him to try and force out a manager doesn't get to criticise ANYONE.

You think the MAJORITY of Rangers fans support England? I seriously doubt that is true and if it is it's fucking shameful.

There is nothing wrong with the punishment at all. All they need to do to make it completely fair is now punish the rest of the gamblers in Scottish football.

I think the major problem is that there isn't any real sports journalism any more. Newspapers (and now TV) like to sensationalise everything and try and make stories out of nothing. Our club is a brilliant target for them. So rather than write the truth, these 'journalists' are always looking to spin things in a way that sounds more exciting and scandalous. They are an embarrassment to real journalists everywhere.

I'll continue to support my national team irrespective of how shoddily run the SFA is. I'll just do it from the pub instead of the stands.

I think a seperate bunch of complaints over the seperate incident might be needed. Right now they are hiding behind a smokescreen saying he received abusive E-mails and tweets and trying to use that to excuse his gaffe. Whatever those E-mails or tweets might have said, it's important they don't distract from the perfectly legitimate complaint we have. Pointing out that Spence was doing his own fair share of abusing is essential I think.

I looks like a boxer. I was expecting a West Highland Tarrier.

Have people made seperate complaints about the 'nazi tweets'? After all, his twitter address has BBC in it. In fact his twitter address STARTS with bbc so he can't try to distance himself and claim his tweets have nothing to do with them. AS The educator already said, he's using the BBC to try and give his waffle more status.

Here's what I sent them:

The page I linked says Data protection act requests cost £10 each but doesn't mention any costs for FoI requests.

Right now there's a few people making complaints to the BBC which are essentially being ignored. What we need is a way to get them to sit up and take notice. I think I have it. https://www.gov.uk/make-a-freedom-of-information-request/the-freedom-of-information-act According to the government website, you have the right to ask any government organisation for all the recorded information they have on any subject. For the BBC, this is clearly an awful lot. So how about spamming them with requests, all saying that really they are just a protest. The BBC has to answer them anyway. You can ask anything E.g what was the 435th word used on the 40th newsnight program broadcast in 1997? how many times did John Craven blink on Newsround? etc..................................... Here's their webpage on how to do it: http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/requesting_information/

CRT televisions need HT power supplies. That's why they were a bugger for dust sticking to them and crackled as they de ionised when you switched them off. That's what made them easy to detect. If you don't believe me ask some of the older posters if they ever saw a TV detector van and if they've seen one in the past 5 years.

Incidentally, both Tam Cowan and Stuart Cosgrove referred to these complaints on their show yesterday and called them mock indignation while slagging off anyone who made them. So BBC Scotland aren't just ignoring the BBC trust findings, they are openly mocking anyone who complains about it.

You have no requirement to have a TV license unless you watch or record live TV. If you only use internet streaming services and catch up TV, you have no obligation whatsoever. However if you do decide to watch live TV without a license, they can't catch you anyway unless you let them. Back in the olden days they could detect your TV because they all used electron guns that could be detected and then compared to the TV signal that was being braodcast. You can't do that with flat screens. SO the TV licensing authority will send you lots of threateneing letters and phonecalls. You can report any muisance calls to your telephone operator and then the police. They pretend to be part of the government at times but the TVLA are actuallyu just a private company hired by the BBC to hassle people for license fees. They will then spen cash to send people out to your home, you have no obligation whatsoever to let them in but since they will be there on your doorstep you can tell them personally what you think of the BBC.

Yeah, they also have an obligation to show the Rangers game highlights on their website since they spent taxpayers mopney on buying the rights but they stopped doing that as well.................

You guys do realise that no matter how many people complain, the BBC will still treat it as a single incident. You should also push the bias angle. Check this out: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/jimspence/2010/11/dundee_punishment_is_misguided.html There isn't a single rational person on earth who could reada that article and then claim Spence isn't massively biased against Rangers. Also, have you made any seperate complaints about his twitter boasts?

You aren't legally obliged at all, this is just what they try and tell you. The only thing you need a license for is if you watch or record live TV. You don't need one for catch up services or streaming services so you can get netflix for a year and still pocket more than half the license fee.

The E-mail of the director of the BBC is tony.hall@bbc.co.uk If you really want to take the time to complain again, I'd sugest doing it through him.