Jump to content

Bears

First Team
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,219

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Bears

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    16 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said:

    Sorry but a fact is not open to interpretation - a fact is measurable, repeatedly measurable. ‘I wear specs’ is  a fact - ‘i look better in specs’ is an opinion. 

    I know my explaination is kinda simple but your post above demonstrated to me I would need to keep it simple.  Orvyou to keep up. 

     

    7 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said:

    Try learning to read before trying to have a pop. 

    The moment you interpret a fact - you provide an opinion. Facts are indisputable - measurable. 

     Know many folks on here have very high opinions of themselves and State their opinions as fact and want their opinions treated like fact but the fact is they are only opinions. 

    Your line 2 of quote 2 completely contradicts line 1 of quote 1. I've even bolded it to make it clear.

    Which makes the smartarse jibes about how intelligent you are compared to the rest of us rather entertaining, in a non-schadenfreude manner of course. :whistle:

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    14 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said:

    Sorry but a fact is not open to interpretation - a fact is measurable, repeatedly measurable. ‘I wear specs’ is  a fact - ‘i look better in specs’ is an opinion. 

    I know my explaination is kinda simple but your post above demonstrated to me I would need to keep it simple.  Orvyou to keep up. 

    And what facts could be offered in this situation be offered in this matter that you also could consider as acceptable? Think of it like a Venn diagram - anything in the middle? One other issue... what constitutes a fact? Not all facts are of a material nature like your specs. Who gets to decide? You? Me? Online poll? Can I guess that you would like to be the arbiter of all facts/not and that those who disagree will be in the 'paranoid' camp?

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    On 10/12/2018 at 21:37, Bluepeter9 said:

    At least calling folk paranoid stays on topic - folk bring up my politics - age - and other external shite to validate their argument - it’s funny, and predictable. 

    Also I have been provided with NO ( that is ZERO) FACTS  that prove there is an agenda against us - there ate many interpretation and opinions of incidents, and rationale behind this or that decisions but not one fact! And interpretation is always in the eye of the beholder. Hence why I always state my opinion is just that - an opinion - but facts - would love you to give me a FACT that proves agenamda or bias. 

    The problem is that you get to decide if something is a fact or not. And there's a strong probability that whatever is (and has been) offered to you will (and has been) rejected immediately by you. Basically because it doesn't fit your own agenda. Is there any proof or evidence you would accept?

    SPFL delegate snubs Gerrard

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    The clear evidence is mounting up that there is bias against us. How many bad decisions do we benefit from compared to those we suffer from. And how are both of these perceived by media, authorities, other fans and even other club officials? There is a clear pattern and it's not even close to balanced, never mind in our favour. In the minds of many we deserve this, being big, bad Rainjurs who cheated everyone. To what extent does this view exist in the SFA, SPFL and referees on the park? And to give some benefit of the doubt (for now) do they they even themselves know it?

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    10 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said:

    Not really - it’s what happens on here pretty often - folk don’t like their arguments debunked and when they realise that they resort to some sort of personal abuse as if that gives their argument more weight and mines less. Pathetic and sad. 

    Looking forward to the debunking happening at some point. Calling people paranoid is the total opposite, being merely personal abuse - you know, that thing you just accused everyone else of doing later in your sentence.

    The definition of paranoid involves, amongst other things, ignoring the evidence before you. You genuinely come across as paranoid that someone might think that you think there is a bias against us. You have been supplied with stats, anecdotal evidence, documentary evidence, etc. but you just come out with 'paranoid!'

    Decide who you want to be here - if you want to troll and call people daft things like paranoid then don't be surprised when folk reject you. But if you want respect, tell us why we are not suffering from bias. It's seems obvious to most of us that we are as a club, so actually show us how we are wrong rather than claim we're deluded. 

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    7 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said:

    Everyone doesn’t see the bias - just the paranoid on here. Ask any other supporter if any other team about ref bias - they’ll tell you how ‘they’ get picked on and how we get the majority of the decisions in our favour!!! 

    Football is a fast paced sport, refereed by guys that are human and make mistakes - mistakes are random so it can seem at times that more mistakes are applied to one team ( say us) but that’s a long way from any intentional, or unintentional bias.

    there are folk on this thread that think that refers have been told to make sure we win nothing - do you really subscribe to that nonsense? 

    By your logic we have the fastest team in the country by a country mile, far faster than the celtc snails!

    Europa League rival watch

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, Ozblue said:

    I agree with you regarding how we can find a way to break up their 10 men behind the ball set-up because it's almost impossible to break it down the way we are set up at the moment. We don't have the midfielders that can hit that killer pass to split their defenders who patrol that area the width of the 18 yard box, so basically, the only way we can do it is with speed down the flanks, which would turn their defenders. The other problem we have is that we don't have a Dado Prso, Nikita Jelavic, Kris Boyd type player who is a 100% penalty box predator, whereas we have Morelos who is actually winning the ball all over the park, then trying to be in a position to be our main scorer. We certainly have come on leaps and bounds since Gerrard arrived, but it's easy to figure out our biggest problem is a lack of goals from our midfielders, because they just aren't prolific scorers; for example, Alfredo has 14 goals and Tavernier is next with 8 goals (mainly PK's) then Lafferty with 4 goals. Then we have EIGHT midfielders who have made double-digit appearances, but only scored 15 goals between them; and therein lies the problem.

    I'd be interested to see how Alfredo gets on playing behind an all-out striker when teams park the bus.

    BBC Article on Morelos

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    See the bit where he regretted the fact that a young foreign player with huge potential, a Colombian cap already even, was being targeted by other players and with no protection from refs, who even seem overly ready and keen to card him of either colour...

    Naw, me neither.

×
×
  • Create New...