LaudrupsPatrickBoots

Aye sometimes the NTL sponsor could go a bit washed out looking because of the material. I much preferred that to the printed on version we had in the nike kits though which used to crack if the top got stretched.

Only ever buy the home one myself. Interesting that nobody else has mentioned the diadora kits. I thought they were good quality.

Not disagreeing with you at all. Just saying ideally I'd prefer us to have 2 kits. There's no need for a 3rd kit other than to generate extra income. Dressing it up as a European kit or anything else is just a marketing ploy.

Even when we're in Europe how often do we really use it? 3rd kits are just another way of fleecing the fans.

Orange kits are never gonna happen again people need to get over that ffs. I'd prefer just a blue home kit and white away. 3rd kits are unnecessary IMO

I actually thought the puma kit was a bit lighter than last years Umbro kit

How many threads on this has there been now?

Slagging his hair and accusing him of having to pay for his hole. Very grown up from them as usual.

Just need to look at the players that came on for Man Utd to see how bad they are. 2 players nowhere near good enough for them and a 3rd who's best years are well behind him.

So they've not ironed or washed it and the logo still just peels off? I call bullshit on that one. If the logos just peeled all by themselves then why are they not peeling off the tops hanging in the shops? Does the adhesive only hold until the top is purchased and then starts failing? I've seen plenty of tops with damaged logos but I've seen far more that are absolutely fine.

Never iron mine either and it's fine. There was a similar thread a few weeks back and I said the same thing. Some don't want to hear it though... The quality is shite and that's that, nothing to do with them ironing the sponsor off

No chance.

Some of the suggestions in this thread are fucking comedy gold honestly

Had mine since the day it came out. Wash it 2, sometimes 3 times a week cos I wear it to fives etc. and my logo is still fine

Aye, I'd also take Messi if we were offered him. Neither will ever happen though.

You always get one that puts a dampener on it.

Why would they not want to beat them?

Difference between not wanting to do it and not being good enough to do it.

Still can't do much for a player's confidence having little or no support to cheer them on.

I'd imagine the pressure of knowing they'd be the first team ever to retain it would be a factor in them failing to do so. Plus they instantly become the team to beat for next season as soon as they win it so maybe the other teams raise their game when they face them. I mean who doesn't want to be the ones to knock out the defending champs?

Tedious shite. Remember the last away game our fans wanted to boycott? Pumped out the Scottish Cup by Dundee United. The team needs support.

The editor is a brilliant thing eh?

Doesn't count towards a 6th star, that record is for being champions of scotland so it's top flight titles only.

The fact so many see it as a choice between staying unbeaten or playing the youngsters says enough really. If playing them means we lose games then they're not ready to play yet.

I'd hope, HOPE, the coaching staff have an idea of who is capable of performing in the first team and who isn't. The sink or swim mentality doesn't work for me. Throwing youngsters in just for the sake of it could do more harm than good, if one of these young boys gets put in for a game and has an absolute howler that could be difficult to recover from. Especially if it were to cost us out unbeaten record.