Jump to content

K.A.I

Senior Member
  • Posts

    28,490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    175

Everything posted by K.A.I

  1. Eh? I never said Alves was in or out think you're confused
  2. I don't think it's a question being fit in percentages, probably more like if he plays his injury get's worse and he's out for maybe months instead of a few games.
  3. Aye but but people believing negative stories, it's Twitter so it can't possibly be true etc etc etc Step up McCrorie young man. Total faith in you.
  4. Really is mental - you got to pick one or the other and stick with it throughout their entire career regardless of form
  5. I thought Fenerbache was quite tame tbh
  6. The tarriers movement and space they get in the final third is ridiculous tbh. We really need to be organised and not do anything rash i.e that wee idiot Beerman at the start of the 5-1 game.
  7. I seen on Wiki he was born in 75 and we signed him in 94 (unless it was 93?) so depending on what time of the year he was born he'd have been 19 or 20 ... maybe I'm wrong I'm an utter spastic with numbers. Simple sums throw me about the place.
  8. I like McCrorie but the thought of that lot against Sinclair, Griffiths, Roberts, McGregor/Forrest and/or Dembele... scary. It's just actually hit home there.
  9. No mate wasn't at that game. That's one of only 5 (I think) Euro away's I've missed since my first one against Gothenburg in 97. I went to Galatasary vs Chelsea a couple of years ago in their new stadium but was pretty low-key and not mental. Southdown1916 was at that game in the video, tho.
  10. 19/20 according to Wiki mate.
  11. Not sure mate. It was 1994, no sure what age he was.
  12. We bought him from the Australian institute of Sport so I'm sure he was already developed and ready to go although he only came onto a game when Advocaat brought him back from Palace when they defaulted on payments. Before that he was horrendous.
  13. I didn't know he was still with us to be honest, but I always thought he looked head and shoulders above other defenders in the under 20's league - but that was season before last - I seen he was at Dumbarton last season but didn't know it was only a loan so I'm glad he's back and put in a good showing the other night.
  14. Aye Pedro exaggerates everything but in my humble opinion he played really well. Not like the usual youth players that get a wee 10-minute cameo and don't do much but everyone raves about them - he was matured, composed, strong in the tackle and good on the ball.
  15. McCrorie it is then. No concerns with that.
  16. Story I've heard from a couple of people through the years inc someone who was a Rangers doctor was that Advocaat went in for De Boer a few weeks earlier and De Boer knocked us back so we went for Hartson instead. Hartson was on his way up when De Boer had a change of heart. David Murray told Advocaat he can have one or the other and he obviously picked De Boer then when Hartson got up we had to make our excuses.
  17. In that case aren't they fucked? I'm sure the LNS verdict was late 2012 or do they operate the way appeals do in courts if new evidence or information comes to light? which in this case would be the oldco losing the big tax case.
  18. I'm pretty sure that's correct. This is another reason why we need our club to hit back.
  19. No doubt with a gagging order too as part of the compo conditions. I despise the way how in the UK the pressure groups seem to make the decisions. I don't even blame the pressure groups, I blame the shite bags in boardrooms that bow to them at every turn.
  20. John as a defender worries me - he's OK going forward but celtic on any sort of counter attack will absolutely destroy us by using the spaces on the flanks at both his and Taveneir's sides. I'm annoyed this hasn't been addressed or even the slightest effort made.
  21. you should be on stage mate sweeping it
  22. I don't know of any pubs there but I know a few good sex clubs if your interested?
  23. That's true but it will be utter best case scenario with a lot of factors having to go for us, namely a review panel set up that wouldn't include celtic lawyers and things of that nature. The last one had a celtic lawyer and Turnbull Hutton and a couple of others who then reccomended an illegal transfer embargo as part of our punishment for bringing the game into disrepute for having the audacity to go into administration due to someone who chaired a fruadulant takeover withholding tax. I wouldn't trust that SPFL mob to pour a drink never mind conduct a fair review that would show us in any sort of good light.
×
×
  • Create New...