Jump to content

K.A.I

Senior Member
  • Posts

    28,490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    175

Everything posted by K.A.I

  1. As opposed to just now, where we're the bad guys but with a constant target on our backs for the lot of them to continue .... I agree about drawing a line in it, but that happens with a firm statement at our end. We draw a line under it on our terms too. We get a say.
  2. It wouldn't surprise me if we supported it. That lot in charge of our great club are capable of disgusting me at every single turn and decision they make.
  3. I don't disagree with that but they are still using us (and the SFA) to remove heat from themselves when it comes to celtic FC and fans of the clubs who still have a bloodlust. Us as the subject matter and the SFA as the ones who won't sanction the review. We have no place on an SPFL board or working alongside the high rankers on it. I said my piece on it last week as to why Robertson should step away from it and tell the world why and withdraw all co-operation with that corrupt organisation as legally and practically possible. Rangers need more than ever to release a statement saying the SPFL are STILL speaking on behalf of one or two people and get it as far and wide as possible or continue to have the target on our backs. This is the chance for it to be put to bed but ONLY if we play it right too
  4. Of course it's about us. Why would there be a need for a review into the things we've done if it's not about us? They might word it that way, keeping our name out of it but it should fool no-one.
  5. If these few lines contain real threats and sincere actions then yes. Absolutely. To say nothing is fucking criminal.
  6. How does it not? if we did nothing wrong, then why would we be onboard with ensuring nothing like this happens again? We are the victims in all this. Even if there's a line of thought going back to how we were fraudulantly taken over and that crook Whyte withheld tax and sunk us, why would we be proactive in backing measures so it never happened again, given the way the people we would now be trying to protect have treated us? Either way it looks ridiculous. But hey, what do I know - the bridge building is in full force.
  7. If they have then they want chased down the marble staircase. It's basically admitting guilt.
  8. We can't move on and have a bright future, if we don't make a signal of our intent that we are watching these fuckers closely because incase you haven't noticed yet it will be something else next month. They are relentless. This dignified pish does not work. We need to take preventitive action and make them think twice about doing anything unfair to us in the future. Not releasing a strongly-worded statement keeps the target on our back for next time.
  9. lol probably sat on a deck chair sipping African wine watching lions tear a zebra to fuck in his garden
  10. Robertson is probably sat with him having a nice wee cup of tea as we speak, speaking about ways we can help all help Scottish football or some shit
  11. Just when you start to get a wee bit of respect back for some of Scottish football they release a statement like that basically to get the tarriers happy saying they wanted it, but can't due to SFA .. again, what's Robertson doing as chief-prick on this board that's released this statement? and where is the official Rangers FC statement? We bring a lot of this shit on ourselves. David Murray was a cunt, no doubt about it, but he had the authorities and media eating out of his hand and we had a manager the whole of Scottish football respected and listened to in Walter Smith. We don't have that spine behind the scenes and it tells.
  12. Maybe the statement comes after this drawling the line under it news is official
  13. Good shout. That would actually explain all this IMO.
  14. Sorry where was the backtracking? would you apply the same logic to Robbie Crawford for example because he was a Rangers youth? You are continually missing my point (and doing more nit-picking) and my point is that I'm saying it's about the pressure he's putting on him with those wild comments. It's in line with his "best squad and team in Scotland" and other snippets ... it's over-the-top. You can blame the Daily Record or whoever you like but there's one person that keeps feeding them garbage from his mouth.
  15. I didn't say that he said that, though, I said it's close to what he said/meant when you quoted someone else that said it. The follow-up excuses/examples you've gave looks like nit-picking to me. It's not made up nonsense if you say someone's Scotland's future. It's a massive leap. Ridiculous in fact. and yes it is along the lines of what Pedro said about him - by that I meant grossly exaggerating someones potential and ability based on 20 minutes of football. He talks bollocks that's a fact in my eyes. This is just the latest example of it. Look at what Siddiqi said, if Pedro just said that I don't think anyone could complain as let's face it if someone like Berra can get the amount of cap's he's got why not someone like McCrorie ... but the future of Scotland and the future of Rangers ... nah, there's praise but that's a bit much and not fair at all.
  16. That's fine and I would agree with that (and would also say it wouldn't be over the top praise at all) but there's a big difference between that and the future of Scotland and Rangers.
  17. You are right. Right sonofbear - apologise to me
  18. You are nit-picking though - you are running with the line about best in history, that was someone elses words earlier in the thread but you know what he meant and exactly what Pedro meant hence why I said you are nit-picking because the two things aren't that big a jump. You might not care who's laughing at him, but I do. I don't like joke figures in charge of my club. It's painful to listen to cunts who don't have anything against Rangers laugh at him for his pish. I'm allowed to be mortified by whatever I want and Pedro does that to me on a weekly basis. He's a bit of a clown and for someone who's meant to have the press' card marked, he's got a funny way of showing it. I like the fact he's impressed with McCrorie as it means he might play him instead of that lump of wood Cardoso but you really can't tell the difference between some praise and putting pressure like that on him/sounding like a clown.
  19. That no the Thistle goal? Does anyone have the goals? I've not seen them back since the game.
  20. Apart from the Craptic part, the OP makes a great point. Those bastards are shameful. Anyway rest in peace Paul Wilson. In other news, I've got a hole in my sock.
  21. Nah for all Pedro's fault's I don't think he's the type to radically adapt in that manner. He's stubborn and determined (that's not a dig before anyone starts) that's his way - he believes we are the best and whatever players he picks are the best so I can't see him going down this route. Re Herrera I was delighted to see him get that wee neat finish last night. As I've said a few times if he get's a run of games with Morelos he could really offer us something, but because he doesn't score 30 goals in 2 starts some fans can't give him the time even though he's genuinely talented - whilst some talentless players seem to get worshipped and loads of chances. Can't fathom it out.
  22. One of the best ever / one of the best ... that's the nit picking. If these really are his opinions then his exit should be hastened ... I've made it clear I think McCorie is a great wee player but he's not even on a par with an Alan McLaren in the mid 90's for example with all due respect. There's talking up players and there's being idiotic ... plenty have talked up McCrorie but no-one apart from Pedro has tried to say he's Scotland's future after 20-minutes of first team football. Pedro seems incapable of doing things/making his point in moderation or relative terms. Everythings got to be exaggerated or for show - I'm sick of it. I'm working different sites and hear cunts laughing at him, not even all tarriers - neutrals and people who aint big into football. It's embarrassing ... people even the neutrals used to respect our managers such as Souness, Smith, McLeish, Advocaat because we didn't get these snippets every week.
  23. Your nitpicking like fuck here. Pedro clearly said he's going to be the future of club and country which means one of the best ever. Maybe not THEE best but one of the best. That's exactly what it means. It's not making up anything. Pedro talks absolute shite and puts needless pressure on himself and others at every turn.
  24. that's the same thing ya nutjob ... if your the club and countries future, then by sheer definition your the countries best?
×
×
  • Create New...