BLUEDIGNITY 33,790 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Fcuk me did a say he wis billy elliot ? mere like a cunt wae riverdance syndrome, selt the jerseys oan Tuesday, selt the jerseys the day. Gutless ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooper1989 0 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Aye.. but is Big Kirk the answer here? Honestly, I thought Dailly was better at RB. Whittaker's confidence must be low. He is a very good football player but hasn't been impressive this year tbh. I generally support him on this forum... But he's not looking too smart these days. :-( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRangers 2 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 God bless the Kirk. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersBear 6 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I agree that Broadfoot should be straight back in. Or Clone Sasa Papac but with a right foot! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 54,869 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Whittaker's versayility means that he is a decent squad player, but I'd really like us to target a new right back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShootSpeedKillLight 0 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Broadfoot's just as bad as Whittaker, just in different ways. More consistent, but incapable of the moments of magic Whittaker occasionally produces. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EuanC 0 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 He's just got comfortable becuase there is no decent challengers imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SandyWaTp Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Whittaker's versayility means that he is a decent squad player, but I'd really like us to target a new right back. Versatile? If he is this poor in his natural position, what is he like in his other weaker positions Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiogh 178 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Broadfoot is woeful, and i dont think someone that is gonna drag the defence back even deeper is the answer to whittakers shortcomings (of which there are many) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theweebluenose 4,335 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I would rather have a right back who can defend than a right back who can attack and do some fancy footwork now and again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 3,736 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Whittaker is playing awful just now. I do think there is ability there but he's just stopped showing it again. Broadfoot is also awful. Hurry back Andy Little?! Couldn't say I've really not seen anything of the lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersBear 6 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Whittaker is playing awful just now. I do think there is ability there but he's just stopped showing it again. Broadfoot is also awful. Hurry back Andy Little?! Couldn't say I've really not seen anything of the lad. Andy Little is a vesatile player, but his natural playing position is a striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisVanDarche 23 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Whittaker is a fucking mongo. Coming back to defend even the worst forwards in the SPL turn him inside out, and most of the time when he's going forward he runs out of ideas, then just loses possession. I'd rather have Broadfoot in the team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Broadfoot is a terrible player as well. Remember last season, he got ripped by many people on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theweebluenose 4,335 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Broadfoot is a terrible player as well. Remember last season, he got ripped by many people on here. To be fair the opinions of people on RM mean fuck all I am in no ways saying Broadfoot is a god player. Whittaker is better at passing Whittaker is better at running with the ball Whittaker is better at taking on players However every aspect of Broadfoots defensive game is superior and thats what I want from a defender. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlasgowRangersChampions52 5 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 get hutton back?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldfish51 0 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 yes get hutton back!!!cant c it happening tho!i think there is more to come from whitaker, he is clearly better at going forward than defending but that was the same with hutton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vasily09 0 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Whittaker's versayility means that he is a decent squad player, but I'd really like us to target a new right back. Versatile? If he is this poor in his natural position, what is he like in his other weaker positions Versatile is just another way of saying that a player is shite in many positions Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisVanDarche 23 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 yes get hutton back!!!cant c it happening tho!i think there is more to come from whitaker, he is clearly better at going forward than defending but that was the same with hutton The difference was that Hutton was actually still good at defending, while Whittaker is somewhat pish at it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vasily09 0 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Broadfoot is woeful, and i dont think someone that is gonna drag the defence back even deeper is the answer to whittakers shortcomings (of which there are many) Broadfoot is 5 times the defender that Whittaker is - sure, he is less of a player with the ball at his feet but I can accept that if we are more solid at the back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapleridgebear 0 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Whittaker's confidence must be very low. His fault for the goal today. Broadfoot is much more solid and I predict will go straight back in when fit unless we need him to play centre half Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
schwantz 23 Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Whittaker is simply awful - he will cost us many goals this season. Not the boys fault, but he simply nowhere near Rangers quality. Cant defend, poor postional sense, cant pass, and rarely gets up the park - time to change for anyone else - even a youngster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts