jimgers 565 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 They say to be a good liar you must have a great memory, well this guy Murray has one seriously bad memory. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,299 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Can someone sum it up for me please, not got this station down here and I am guessing I missed it now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,617 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 his 25 million was all for the team. lloyds would have got there cash as per the terms of the loan. which were pretty good.excellent idea. Lets have a national bank with no ties to the club as our main creditor instead of our actual chairman. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King_gazza 1,065 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 So has Murray been on RR yet?If so what did he say? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,617 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 He also stated that during his time, the board were totally in control of affairs, which clearly contradicts the theory that Lloyds were in charge.he's full of pish then. Is that him claiming Walter smith as a liar then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 anyone share what this nomark fucked said?missed it, was out at football with the kids? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 excellent idea. Lets have a national bank with no ties to the club as our main creditor instead of our actual chairman.It wouldn't have been a problem with such a relatively small amount of debt. It didn't happen, so it's kind of redundant now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,288 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 He said very little TBH ... just asked where the 24 million has gone but until we see what happens with the tax case we don't really have any choice but to give Whyte the benefit of the doubt Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Why deny the ticket story in the summer but admit it now?Where has the £24m gone from Ticketus?Why not produce accounts showing the money in and the money out to clear things up? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatler24 2 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Is Paul Murray related in any way to SDM?I think it was a civil partnership Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,288 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 He keeps saying he's a Rangers supporter can't say I've ever known a Bear called Paul Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 He also stated that during his time, the board were totally in control of affairs, which clearly contradicts the theory that Lloyds were in charge.not when lloyds had two people on the board perhaps. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 75,701 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Gazza... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 That wasn't all he said.what did he really say? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 excellent idea. Lets have a national bank with no ties to the club as our main creditor instead of our actual chairman.who's funding us through a finance company. what's the difference. most businesses and indeed individuals have a bank as their funding partner. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 He keeps saying he's a Rangers supporter can't say I've ever known a Bear called Paul I have, and a Kevin. There's also a Sean and a Declan on here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marka1979 76 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Why deny the ticket story in the summer but admit it now?Where has the £24m gone from Ticketus?Why not produce accounts showing the money in and the money out to clear things up?Totally agree mate , was thinking the same myself Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,288 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Jeeze no wonder things are so dire at Ibrox these days Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted February 3, 2012 Author Share Posted February 3, 2012 Paul Murray is a liar (he can sue me if he wants). He twice stated on RR that during his time on the board, the debt was halved. Here is the timeline:June 2007 - Net debt £16.5mSept 2007 - Paul Murray appointedJune 2008 - Net debt £21.5mJune 2009 - Net debt £31.1mJune 2010 - Net debt £27.1mMay 2011 - Paul Murray resignedJune 2011 - Net debt £32.1m*So the net debt nearly doubled.Facts, them pesky facts, they usually only exist to catch out lying mhanks. *Note in May 2011, Whyte paid off the £18m Lloyds loan and for technical reasons, the Whyte/Group loan isn't included in net debt. So the £14.1m net debt actually disclosed in the 2011 accounts has been adjusted so that the above table is comparing like with like. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 what did he really say?Went on to say it was a huge worry if we lose the appeal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Totally agree mate , was thinking the same myselfThey were the questions posed by Paul Murray. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonok 1,245 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Paul Murray is a liar (he can sue me if he wants). He twice stated on RR that during his time on the board, the debt was halved. Here is the timeline:June 2007 - Net debt £16.5mSept 2007 - Paul Murray appointedJune 2008 - Net debt £21.5mJune 2009 - Net debt £31.1mJune 2010 - Net debt £27.1mMay 2011 - Paul Murray resignedJune 2011 - Net debt £32.1m*So the net debt nearly doubled.Facts, them pesky facts, they usually only exist to catch out lying mhanks. *Note in May 2011, Whyte paid off the £18m Lloyds loan and for technical reasons, the Whyte/Group loan isn't included in net debt. So the £14.1m net debt actually disclosed in the 2011 accounts has been adjusted so that the above table is comparing like with like.Nice one boss Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Went on to say it was a huge worry if we lose the appeal.whys he talking about an appeal. the original case hasnt even been decided on yet Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stardog 11 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 I'm sure what he said was interesting to the 12 people who listen to Real Radio. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Paul Murray is a liar (he can sue me if he wants). He twice stated on RR that during his time on the board, the debt was halved. Here is the timeline:June 2007 - Net debt £16.5mSept 2007 - Paul Murray appointedJune 2008 - Net debt £21.5mJune 2009 - Net debt £31.1mJune 2010 - Net debt £27.1mMay 2011 - Paul Murray resignedJune 2011 - Net debt £32.1m*So the net debt nearly doubled.Facts, them pesky facts, they usually only exist to catch out lying mhanks. *Note in May 2011, Whyte paid off the £18m Lloyds loan and for technical reasons, the Whyte/Group loan isn't included in net debt. So the £14.1m net debt actually disclosed in the 2011 accounts has been adjusted so that the above table is comparing like with like.did he say net debt?sounds like he was doing a pr excercise regardless. need to give it a listen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.