Tamb 126 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Are we all forgetting that the administrators first responsibility is to the businesses crediditors? The way I se it right now, CW still thinks that he is No1 creditor as he has the floating charge. This may or may not prove to be the case but if it is so, then the administrators are acting in his interests. The next period will be very telling, it looks like we are just waiting for the result of the FTT, before any real plans can be made. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 yeah he can't just do a runner like whyte.Oh dear. You always come across like a classless swine. That's the confirmation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmalade1872 40 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 sometimes the best way to hide/steal something is to do it right in front of the people who are being robbed Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Not sure if anyone actually said HMRC would be able to appoint an administrator. I certainly didn't. I think the discussion was about the choice HMRC put forward as administrator, for the court to decide who was appointed.That means the same thing in everyday language. As officers of the court, they are duty bound to act in the best interests of the company and it's creditors. In what order, is the big question. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 That means the same thing in everyday language. As officers of the court, they are duty bound to act in the best interests of the company and it's creditors. In what order, is the big question."Appoint an administrator" and "put forward their choice of administrator" aren't the same in any language, everyday or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Crooks the lot of them Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 If The Record story is accurate, we are now at the mercy of Whyte and whether he fights any proposed action against his floating charge claim.If The Blue Knights don't see that there is a need to shed some of these players to give us a sustainable future, they should be shown the door right away.Many more twists and turns still to come. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 "Appoint an administrator" and "put forward their choice of administrator" aren't the same in any language, everyday or not. Either scenario has to be approved by the court. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted March 3, 2012 Author Share Posted March 3, 2012 Crooks the lot of themSure you've got plenty of evidence for that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Sure you've got plenty of evidence for that.Yep, fuckin bunch of shystersHow much are we paying for this circus of parasites? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Yep, fuckin bunch of shystersHow much are we paying for this circus of parasites?They're on day rate, so no rush. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 They're on day rate, so no rush. Cunts will be on time and a half today and I bet they don't pay £28 for their tickets Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Any delays are down to the thief not the administrators. It's frustrating but it's going to take time.Oh and gunslinger Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marka1979 76 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 All the money should of been in the clubs accounts from the start. only time will tell but there saying there aint enough money to keep rangers going then we could go into liquidation. somehow i think this was whytes plan all along as we all know how long court cases take. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmalade1872 40 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 as i keep saying its time to make arrests and get to the bottom of this whole matter right iam off to the pub and then on to ibrox tooraloo Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 That's a really poor comment from you to mock someone's disability. I didn't he has a big buissiness in Scotland. he has to be here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Had a meeting today with a vastly experienced IP that has worked with Whitehouse in a professional capacity. He vouched for him unquestionably - said he will play it straight down the line and that he values his career and reputation too much to be a stooge for anyone. Take what you want from that.The 2 guys in are also director level within the company, Manchest and London I believe. I cant recall reading any poor reviews of the company either Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 I asked the IP guy about that yesterday also.His reply was that there is a team working for the Administrators, some of them very experienced who have been in insolvency for many years. They know exactly how administrations run, the processes that need to be gone through and, importantly, how the two Administrators usually operate. They would be able to smell a rat. Staff leave. Staff talk. Staff get disgruntled. He reckoned that the Administrators would be found out if they did anything untoward and therefore won't.For instance, there is a major stushie among IPs just now about the Portsmouth administration - virtually every IP believes the Administrator should not have take on the job because of a conflict of interest. Indeed even the other guy, Andronikou, should never have been going for it either because of a conflict. The reputations of these two IPs have taken a battering amongst their peers.I don't expect an outrageous decisions. but if somethings 50/50 they go the way of whyte. like the tarrier refs in Scotland. didn't you once say I'm a good accountant I can make a case for anything. but we will see. if theirs any truth to todays record article we can rule out any foul play. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 you lot have sick minds. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 I didn't he has a big buissiness in Scotland. he has to be here.A retraction would have been the bigger thing to do. Despite appearances, we're not stupid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 A retraction would have been the bigger thing to do. Despite appearances, we're not stupid. its ok boss it says more about you than me that that's how your mind works. I look a sdm and see a business man. you clearly see a cripple. I've never though of him that way for a second and as such it would never cross my mind not to say what I did. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 its ok boss it says more about you than me that that's how your mind works. I look a sdm and see a business man. you clearly see a cripple. I've never though of him that way for a second and as such it would never cross my mind not to say what I did.Pathetic. And everyone reading your post knows that's pathetic. Seriously out of order making a tasteless joke about Murray's disability, then trying to deny it, then trying to turn it against someone else. If only you knew the reasons why your comment above is utterly despicable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Pathetic. And everyone reading your post knows that's pathetic. Seriously out of order making a tasteless joke about Murray's disability, then trying to deny it, then trying to turn it against someone else. If only you knew the reasons why your comment above is utterly despicable. believe what you want boss as I say its a reflection on you not me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 believe what you want boss as I say its a reflection on you not me.Pathetic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Pathetic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.