North Rd 2,860 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 King has told Stephen Mcgowan he will be on the Board sooner than later.................from his piece today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Mr King will never hand over cash to your puppet masters Bawsburst move on and get another idea. The money is for Rangers not your pockets. You seem to becoming more and more desperate fore your masters to cashoutIf you want control buying the club off those at own it currently is generally the done thing. If King doesn't want to do that then fine but would rather he shut up talking about us . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 King has told Stephen Mcgowan he will be on the Board sooner than later.................from his piece today.McGowan of celtic view infamy, the obvious question is why king would give him the time of day.... if he has. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 McGowan of celtic view infamy, the obvious question is why king would give him the time of day.... if he has.McGowan has always been Kings media spokesperson Why him? I dont honestly know.......... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,346 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 I don't understand why we continually character assassinate one of our own. We have enough enemies that do that for us. I'm sick of this pish. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 I don't understand why we continually character assassinate one of our own. We have enough enemies that do that for us. I'm sick of this pish. well said Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 I don't understand why we continually character assassinate one of our own. We have enough enemies that do that for us. I'm sick of this pish.He'a a businessman and a lot of businessmen who apparently support us have been massive let downs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 No one man should ever own 51% or more of Rangers again have we learned nothing from the past. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 I don't understand why we continually character assassinate one of our own. We have enough enemies that do that for us. I'm sick of this pish.It was a South African judge who gave DK his character and then some. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 No one man should ever own 51% or more of Rangers again have we learned nothing from the past.Both methods have their flaws, least one owner could stop every AGM being a propaganda driven farce Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 McGowan has always been Kings media spokesperson Why him? I dont honestly know..........If true then it shows how far King is removed from the world most Rangers supporters I know live in.Most Bears I know wouldn't piss on that snivelling little Tarrier scrote if he were on fire in the middle of Sauchiehall Street.I'm guessing all those years in a SA sun have frazzled King's brain. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Both methods have their flaws, least one owner could stop every AGM being a propaganda driven farceWould also make every AGM an irrelevance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 Would also make every AGM an irrelevance. Which with a benevolent owner would let all return to the staple menu... Fitba' Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Would also make every AGM an irrelevance.Not sure I'd mind that after the last one, might just be me being reactionary though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Which with a benevolent owner would let all return to the staple menu... Fitba'And who keeps a check on this owner?If you don't like what he's doing how do change anything if he has 51%? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Not sure I'd mind that after the last one, might just be me being reactionary thoughFledgling democracy, it was always going to be like kids in the playground.Hopefully it will get better as time goes on and the idiots slip away leaving the serious men to decide on the future of the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 And who keeps a check on this owner?If you don't like what he's doing how do change anything if he has 51%?I would suggest the word benevolent was the answer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hubbard 280 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 The South African taxman also listed a R200 million(11 million pounds) payment from Rangers to him, yet people keep banding about a £20 million loss.so he only lost £9 millionwell that's all right then ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Benevolent is something the Edinburgh vineyard-lover was most certainly not.There's a more descriptive word for him, 'sleekit'. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenosebrad 452 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 so he only lost £9 millionwell that's all right then !Was thinking the same he only lost 9 Mil ffs I moan if I lose a £10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 Benevolent is something the Edinburgh vineyard-lover was most certainly not.There's a more descriptive word for him, 'sleekit'.Which gives birth to a conundrum... is the gunrunners chum sleekitly benevolent ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 No one man should ever own 51% or more of Rangers again have we learned nothing from the past.sheikh mansour? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.