Muff 245 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 "I think it is bad business if you only bring in players under the Bosman law and they are not good enough. If the only reason you are bringing them in is because they are free, they become expensive. The point is to bring in good players."Jose Mourinho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Like the £30 million he spent on Shev ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 "I think it is bad business if you only bring in players under the Bosman law and they are not good enough. If the only reason you are bringing them in is because they are free, they become expensive. The point is to bring in good players."Jose MourinhoLink?When did he say it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Mourinho did'nt buy shevy he what bought by abramovich, thats why they were problem between the two last year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Jose hasn't spent a penny and has brought in 4 players (Sidwell, Pizarro, Haim and someone else). What a load of shite he talks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza 21 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 He says that from the rather nice position of having millions upon millions to spend.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Mourinho did'nt buy shevy he what bought by abramovich, thats why they were problem between the two last yearI dont know if I can buy into that theory DB - Jose is a manager of considerable standing - I cannot see him being pushed around by any chairman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted July 3, 2007 Author Share Posted July 3, 2007 http://sport.independent.co.uk/football/pr...icle2730438.ece Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeerHunter 0 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 "Frank Lampard's agent said the Chelsea midfielder has not rejected a new contract and wants to stay at Stamford Bridge for the rest of his career. The England midfielder was thought to have turned down a contract extension that would have made him Chelsea's highest earner on a weekly wage of £131,000."Marvellous innit! The geezer fails to reach any kinda decent form for 18 months (or there abouts) and his agent's still attempting to secure him more dough!It's a Mad Mad (footballing) World. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenage bear 5 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Jose hasn't spent a penny and has brought in 4 players (Sidwell, Pizarro, Haim and someone else). What a load of shite he talks He may talk a load of shite Danny BUT we would have every one of the freebies that he has got, and every one of those players had options, the ones we have , well, you decide, who would you rather have Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Jose hasn't spent a penny and has brought in 4 players (Sidwell, Pizarro, Haim and someone else). What a load of shite he talks Great manager...complete and utter prat of a man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Jose hasn't spent a penny and has brought in 4 players (Sidwell, Pizarro, Haim and someone else). What a load of shite he talks Oops...double post. Please delete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoff 7 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 the players chelsea have gotten for free would walk into our team and celtics easy. He means that if you can get a good player for free, then get him but just getting bosmans for the sake of them being free is pointless, a la sionko and capucho from recent years! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,123 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Did we no actually pay for Capucho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 762 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 "Frank Lampard's agent said the Chelsea midfielder has not rejected a new contract and wants to stay at Stamford Bridge for the rest of his career. The England midfielder was thought to have turned down a contract extension that would have made him Chelsea's highest earner on a weekly wage of £131,000."Marvellous innit! The geezer fails to reach any kinda decent form for 18 months (or there abouts) and his agent's still attempting to secure him more dough!It's a Mad Mad (footballing) World.It's absolutly scandelous Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,123 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 They should be embarrassed to earn £131k a week Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoff 7 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Did we no actually pay for CapuchoI hope not ostenstad then, we got him for free! Jeez, it's scary to think of the donkeys we have brought in back then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts