CF5LOYAL 0 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 It was 3 minutes on the board yet the ref blew 20 seconds early when Cuellar had passed the ball into the middle. We still had time for another attack :angry2: I know we didn't at all look like scoring but that one attack could be the difference of winning and losing the league!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 It may seem a small point but surely this is just incompetence ... 92m 42sec Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_ni 12 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 just more crap refereeing , craigan on a yellow card and made several fouls after it including clattering cousin yet still on the pitch, whittaker flew into a tackle against celtic and gets sent off, i am fed up with the double standards in the spl. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 It may seem a small point but surely this is just incompetence Because we might have scored had he allowed the time he added on... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 yeah i notcied taht aswell. still 1 last chance to launch it in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEL1974 0 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 i think we could have played all afternoon and not scored tbh as much as it hurts me too say far too predictable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CF5LOYAL 0 Posted May 17, 2008 Author Share Posted May 17, 2008 I posted the same thing on another thread. He blew up 20 seconds early whilst we still had the ball and were about to lauch it back into the mixer. That one attack could be the difference between winning and losing the title. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkiebear 1,013 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 darcheville v inverness anyone, we didnt look like scoring then but we did, thats the importance of playing the supposed minimum of added time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcbear 10,924 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 We could still be playing now and not scored a goal, when we needed to stand up and be counted, not many did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rohan 25 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 I noticed this, also didn't know how Motherwell got a Throw in with about 90 secs left, it clearly came off one of their players? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluemeanie6 3 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 I posted the same thing on another thread. He blew up 20 seconds early whilst we still had the ball and were about to lauch it back into the mixer. That one attack could be the difference between winning and losing the title. who knows, but as many have already said, we could of had shots all day and not scored we were that bad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloud 3 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 I'm not going to moan about it. We could have played til next Saturday and not scored. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CF5LOYAL 0 Posted May 17, 2008 Author Share Posted May 17, 2008 I noticed this, also didn't know how Motherwell got a Throw in with about 90 secs left, it clearly came off one of their players? The ball clearly came off Lasleys hand and the ref pointed at Darcheville and said it came off his head!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmanhaggis 0 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 20 seconds are not gunna make a difference really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CF5LOYAL 0 Posted May 17, 2008 Author Share Posted May 17, 2008 20 seconds are not gunna make a difference really. Ask Man UTD in the Champions league final the same question. That 20 seconds could be the difference. One more chance to get it onto the box, how many times have the cradle snatchers scored in added time! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalbluebell 38 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 Only takes a second to score a goal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stardog 11 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 Cheating refs as usual. No surprise it all happens at the end of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paisley1967 11 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 Whether we looked like scoring or not the point is that when there is added time of three minutes it should not be less FFS the ref's are fucken brutal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 If Cuellar had got the ball forward quicker instead of fannying about with it on the right, twisting and turning then we may of had a chance. I very much doubt it, we were lucky last week against Dundee United and I dont think the 18 seconds would of made much difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
greig72 0 Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 Glad to see most people in this thread are being reasonable, and since the two major points have already been covered (we weren't scoring today if we played a third half; Mike McCurry was guilty at Ibrox last week in our favour), I have nothing new to contribute, save for my support of common sense. This was a major test for us today - the question was whether we had the strength to do what was required to win the SPL. We had to win three games, all of which against teams with no remaining prizes to play for. We failed at the first hurdle not because of bad refereeing, but because of lethargy and football that lacked bite. Simple. Besides, if we go through the season and and retrospectively correct every refereeing decision that was erroneous, do you really think we'd be in a better position? Celtic and Rangers would both have less points than they currently do, no question. So let's stop whining about this pish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmarvloyal 0 Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Glad to see most people in this thread are being reasonable, and since the two major points have already been covered (we weren't scoring today if we played a third half; Mike McCurry was guilty at Ibrox last week in our favour), I have nothing new to contribute, save for my support of common sense. This was a major test for us today - the question was whether we had the strength to do what was required to win the SPL. We had to win three games, all of which against teams with no remaining prizes to play for. We failed at the first hurdle not because of bad refereeing, but because of lethargy and football that lacked bite. Simple. Besides, if we go through the season and and retrospectively correct every refereeing decision that was erroneous, do you really think we'd be in a better position? Celtic and Rangers would both have less points than they currently do, no question. So let's stop whining about this pish. Reasonable? No, they are being fucking stupid. 3 minutes injury time is 3 minutes. It's only reasonable to expect that to be played. It is UNREASONABLE to try and make excuses for the ref blowing his whistle early. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Its only 20 seconds but thats not the point I watched a lot of football and to see it tended 20 seconds early is very rare Plus MUCH stranger things have happened in football than a goal witht he last kick of the ball I dont even know how you can put it down to bad refereeing, he mustve known exactly how long was gone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossDas 1,071 Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Aye, was baffled and pissed off. And why are we the only team in the world to be penalised for foul throws? You see them all the time but aparently we're the only one's who are guilty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts