Centre Half Pairing

[walter smiths revolution 0]

With everybody fit, who would you have at centre back?

I added in Hemdani because i think it would be ashame if he lost his place if Clement stays, though it is unlikely!

[trueblue1872 2]

Not to sure but i went with Weir and Webster but for now it should be Weir and Svensson until Websters back.

[CANUCKBEAR 0]

I know its been untested but If we played with three at the back, with 5 in the middle then that way we could have buffel in their in his preferred role behind the front two.

AM

Weir Ehiogu Webster

Burke Hemdani Ferguson Smith

Buffel

Boyd Prso

When defending we could always have Smith drop back and the back three rotating.

What u think?

[Ayebrox 0]

I'd give Weir and Svensson 5 or 6 games together. If Svensson starts to look the real deal, stick with it. If not, I would give Webster his chance. In my opinion, Webster was the best CB in the SPL before he left Hearts, I don't care what happened at Wigan, I believe he can do a good job for us.

[walter smiths revolution 0]

I know its been untested but If we played with three at the back, with 5 in the middle then that way we could have buffel in their in his preferred role behind the front two.

AM

Weir Ehiogu Webster

Burke Hemdani Ferguson Smith

Buffel

Boyd Prso

When defending we could always have Smith drop back and the back three rotating.

What u think?

Think that if you were to do that it should be Hutton or a wing back instead of burkey and play with two wingback and buffel in a free role. Other than that i think it could work, three solid defenders, mabye need a pacey one in there cos they three are quite slow

[Canadaready 9,437]

This will be a vote for the ages!

[Danny 9]

By Christ, no clue. Just happy to see loads of options

[walter smiths revolution 0]

By Christ, no clue. Just happy to see loads of options

Indeed, and none of them really weak, unless your counting Hemdani because thats not his real position. Would be happy with any partnership!

[gersal 0]

I know its been untested but If we played with three at the back, with 5 in the middle then that way we could have buffel in their in his preferred role behind the front two.

AM

Weir Ehiogu Webster

Burke Hemdani Ferguson Smith

Buffel

Boyd Prso

When defending we could always have Smith drop back and the back three rotating.

What u think?

I think that in nearly 50 years of watching Rangers this would have to be the SLOWEST team I'd have seen

[BlueSuedeSambas 54,391]

Ideally i would like to see a Webster Svesnsson partnership but that seems unlikely. Hopefully we stick with Weir and one of he younger centre backs as Weirs pressence could be vital to them if they are to make it at Ibrox.

[ricardopatrese 0]

oh man, this makes for depressing reading - nearly half of you guys want two players who are almost identical in style, pace and technique to play at CH beside each other!!! that's it. we're f**ked!

[ricardopatrese 0]

I know its been untested but If we played with three at the back, with 5 in the middle then that way we could have buffel in their in his preferred role behind the front two.

 

                              AM

            Weir        Ehiogu      Webster

Burke          Hemdani    Ferguson    Smith

                            Buffel

                Boyd                      Prso       

When defending we could always have Smith drop back and the back three rotating.

What u think?

I think that in nearly 50 years of watching Rangers this would have to be the SLOWEST team I'd have seen

wholeheartedly agree - how fuckin depressing would watching this lot be!

[J_RFC87 761]

Hemdani fits into my team, at DM.

Weir and Webster.

[CanadianGer 1]

I'm really torn on this, TBH. Eventually, I'd like to see Webster and Svensson of course. For now, I'm thinking Weir with Svensson is a good start and lets us see how Karl can settle down. Hopefully Walter has him staying late for extra heading practice.

[polar bear 0]

For the rest of the season at least I would go with Weir and Ehiogu,it would be a disaster if we didn't finish second,and next year Walter play around and find his best combination.

[whytes3 254]

Weir and Webster for me - they are the 2 best players on papaer IMO and I thinkg the Scotland set up will have the added benefit of them having played together before (in training at least).

Svensson needs games to build up skill and confidence though - that is something that cannot be ignored as Weir, Ehiogu and Webster are all short term deals (although hopefully Webster will become a permanat signing) and we need to get Svensson playing to his potential.

[BlueSuedeSambas 54,391]

to be fair Svensson looked a lot better with somebody to talk him through the game beside him. Long may it continue!

[D'Artagnan 13,319]

This is a hard one.....as I said earlier on another thread I think we need to build for the future...

However Im sure that even when Webster is fit I have a feeling from Wattie's preference he wil go for experience.

Id like to see both Webster and Svensson benefit from the experience of these 2 older players...the problem with that is that it means chopping and changing the CH pairing.

[nvager 498]

I agree with Danny - no clue - let WS find out at Murray Park. I trust him.

[Muff 245]

Weir and Webster for me.

[Rohan 25]

Don't know, i'm sure Walter will play who's best though

[The Beast 9,253]

I know its been untested but If we played with three at the back, with 5 in the middle then that way we could have buffel in their in his preferred role behind the front two.

AM

Weir Ehiogu Webster

Burke Hemdani Ferguson Smith

Buffel

Boyd Prso

When defending we could always have Smith drop back and the back three rotating.

What u think?

As far as I know Walter has never played with a back three with Rangers Everton or Scotland.

I really don't see him doing it now.

It's not the time for experiments.