GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Eh...hartson is a scumbag...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Eh...hartson is a scumbag...... correct he is a scumbag and should have been jailed for his attack. and you are right i would never kick anyone in the head and thats why the were found guilty. but lennon should have been charged for his part. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandBear 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 i used to think that there was no excuse for kicking a person in the head when they were down until a mr hartson done it. What was big bad john the Swansea Loyalists sentence fior that again? remembering it was on film. Oh thats right it didnt even get as far as the police. shocking.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Stars Bearette 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 ok Lennon started the aggression but them finishing it off by kicking him in the head sealed their fate. Head kicks are often fatal or dibilitating and are really ott violence Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,682 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Eh...hartson is a scumbag...... And lennon isn't ? Kickin fcuk out of a photographer come to mind, threatening women comes to mind ????WTF ????? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Eh...hartson is a scumbag...... correct he is a scumbag and should have been jailed for his attack. and you are right i would never kick anyone in the head and thats why the were found guilty. but lennon should have been charged for his part. No arguements from me... tough guy Lennon who makes threatening phone calls to woman...wasn't so tough that night Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,682 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 ok Lennon started the aggression but them finishing it off by kicking him in the head sealed their fate. Head kicks are often fatal or dibilitating and are really ott violence It didnae bother him when he was kickin fcuk oot a photograpers heid or threatenin women ???WTF???? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Eh...hartson is a scumbag...... And lennon isn't ? Kickin fcuk out of a photographer come to mind, threatening women comes to mind ????WTF ????? Doesn't excuse kicking him in the head....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandBear 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Imo if you are prepared to act in an aggressive manner & square up to 2 lads out on a night out, you should be expecting a kick in the head if you go down. Its the rules of the street, unfortunately, and if he wants to act the hard man, should be ready to take the consiquences, he is a pro football coach and supposed professional, he should have walked on after the initial confrontation. If he had, by what i have read, none of this sorry incident would have happened, i would hope for community service for one, the other will get a sentence but be released as it will work out to coincide with the time he has already spent inside on remand, i would have thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 For the record Sheriff Martin Jones, who was the judge, is a tim....i wonder if he declared this.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,682 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Well you can be sure of one thing the scrote will be up the West End today celebratin sayin thats another 2 Bluenose I've got the pokey. We are to soft we really are ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Stars Bearette 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each cheeeez thats harsh and that peado headmaster didn't even get jailed....our justice system is crazy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 The two men were correctly found guilty of assault for kicking Lennon in the head whilst down on the ground (even though with him I'm not sure that would have caused that much damage), but I am pleased to see that they haven't been found guilty of any form of religious or disciminatory attack. Even though I'm sure some of the Mhedia will still put a spin on it. As for Lennon, he should have also been charged for causing the incident in the first place, he is supposed to be a professional ex-footballer/coach and should know better, but looking at his past record when he did play football I'm not really surprised that he did something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Imo if you are prepared to act in an aggressive manner & square up to 2 lads out on a night out, you should be expecting a kick in the head if you go down. Its the rules of the street, What a load of shit, it's the action of a scumbag..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each cheeeez thats harsh and that peado headmaster didn't even get jailed....our justice system is crazy They have some very serious previous....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandBear 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each Appeal straight away lads. That is shocking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandBear 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each cheeeez thats harsh and that peado headmaster didn't even get jailed....our justice system is crazy They have some very serious previous....... wher is this serious previous, as i am searching on line and am still to find any? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each Appeal straight away lads. That is shocking. Both have done a fair bit of time in the past..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each cheeeez thats harsh and that peado headmaster didn't even get jailed....our justice system is crazy They have some very serious previous....... wher is this serious previous, as i am searching on line and am still to find any? One is a drug trafficer who has served at least 5 years..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 2 years is a disgrace when you think child molesters get probation or hit and run drivers who kill people get less. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandBear 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each Appeal straight away lads. That is shocking. Both have done a fair bit of time in the past..... In their 20's??? And what was it for etc.. Their is a lot more tto that sentence than previous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 They got 2 years each Appeal straight away lads. That is shocking. Both have done a fair bit of time in the past..... In their 20's??? And what was it for etc.. Their is a lot more tto that sentence than previous. they are in there 40's...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandBear 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 wher is this serious previous, as i am searching on line and am still to find any? One is a drug trafficer who has served at least 5 years..... so none as violent crime then. If this was not lennon they would not be serving right now. That is a fact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Lennon should be reprimanded by his club for even being out in Glasgow in the first place, given the circumstances. But that clearly won't happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts