The Beast 9,220 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, Barca-Bear said: Both UEFA and SPFL rules state that kit designs that are submitted for the season can't be changed throughout the season, second and third strips can be released later though and King said in his press conference that they are working with PUMA to release these in the next couple of months. I think we should be giving him a decent amount of credit for getting this deal sorted, I think a lot of it had to do with pressure from SD shareholders, but the board should be praised for this as it's beyond what most fans would have expected. Is there anything to stop a third team strip being worn most of the time? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LochendBilly 8,413 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 12 minutes ago, The Beast said: Is there anything to stop a third team strip being worn most of the time? Yes...From SPFL Rules G33 Subject to the provisions of Rules G35, G37 and G38 Clubs are required to wear their first choice colours in all League Matches and Play-Off Matches, save that a Club shall be permitted to play a maximum of four Home League Matches in any Season in colours which are not the first choice, provided that the Company, the opposing Club and the Referee appointed for such League Match have been advised in writing not less than 48 hours before such League Match and the Referee (whose responsibility shall relate to the match in question only in this regard) shall determine whether each Club can wear its first choice colours in any given League Match or Play-Off Match in order to ensure compliance with Rules 54 G35, G37 and G38. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barca-Bear 3 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, The Beast said: Is there anything to stop a third team strip being worn most of the time? The rules for both also say that the home kit that is submitted must be worn in every home game unless there is a clash with all combinations of the away team colours or with the match officials. SPFL rule G33 allows for a home team to wear another kit in a maximum of 4 home league games, as long as the club seeks approval 48 hours in advance. I'm pretty sure this will be the home kit for the full season with a new one released next year, but expect away and third kits to come in August. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast 9,220 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 Just now, Barca-Bear said: The rules for both also say that the home kit that is submitted must be worn in every home game unless there is a clash with all combinations of the away team colours or with the match officials. SPFL rule G33 allows for a home team to wear another kit in a maximum of 4 home league games, as long as the club seeks approval 48 hours in advance. I'm pretty sure this will be the home kit for the full season with a new one released next year, but expect away and third kits to come in August. Fair enough. Good info. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LochendBilly 8,413 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 http://spfl.co.uk/docs/067_324__therulesofthespfl_1375800603.pdf Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,825 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 8 minutes ago, LochendBilly said: http://spfl.co.uk/docs/067_324__therulesofthespfl_1375800603.pdf I'll save you going through the SPFL rules, what it basically says is this: Whatever Liewell and tim FC say is what you will all abide by. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,195 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 1 hour ago, Smile said: @thebooler Some slagged the guy off. Said it was done and dusted. Slagged who off, King??? Cause you and some of your bum chums kept slagging the Rangers board for trying to get a fair deal for Rangers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,606 Posted June 21, 2017 Author Share Posted June 21, 2017 1 hour ago, A.T.G said: The Booler is Dave King Booler did call it he called a lot right the Houston Fiasco and the Marshall being less than honest, seems to have some good intel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,606 Posted June 21, 2017 Author Share Posted June 21, 2017 51 minutes ago, siddiqi_drinker said: I predict his observations about ED House CIC may also come to fruition, just a wild guess. All hail @thebooler He caught a few of the chancers it has to be said Credit to the booler. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammer93 15,057 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 2 hours ago, The Beast said: What, do you think they just rolled up today and signed a document with no talks over previous weeks? Here's a tip, it's better to say nothing and have people suspect you might be an idiot than open your mouth and remove all doubt. Brilliant Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thewhitesettler 2,711 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 5 hours ago, The Beast said: What, do you think they just rolled up today and signed a document with no talks over previous weeks? Here's a tip, it's better to say nothing and have people suspect you might be an idiot than open your mouth and remove all doubt. But he let his fingers do the talking! ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottyarf37 963 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 9 hours ago, Smile said: @thebooler Some slagged the guy off. Said it was done and dusted. Best hope pedro doesnt find out or the Booler will be wearing concrete boots. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
piperpete 3,186 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 9 hours ago, MisterBlueSky said: Exactly mate. The OP is Keith Jackson's brother. Sister mate, therec was no need to be sexist? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sket 13,610 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 This seems like 1 of they shite threads that belong in the boredroom section. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,606 Posted June 22, 2017 Author Share Posted June 22, 2017 12 hours ago, The Beast said: And you know that how exactly. That it was pure guesswork? His Priest told him when he was lubing him up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,647 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Right next prophesy from the booler needs answered ? Who will Ashley sell his shares too ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,606 Posted June 22, 2017 Author Share Posted June 22, 2017 11 hours ago, JCDBigBear said: I'll save you going through the SPFL rules, what it basically says is this: Whatever Liewell and tim FC say is what you will all abide by. This we have let them walk all over us it's time to take more control over the Sfa and Scottish football again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, BLUEDIGNITY said: Right next prophesy from the booler needs answered ? Who will Ashley sell his shares too ? I'm not sure at the moment, but my money would be on King. ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,647 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Just now, thebooler said: I'm not sure at the moment, but my money would be on King. ? Think you could be close there ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.