IF, we sign this fella for the reported fee, then it's a sign of how far our spending power has fallen that I'm jittery about us spending such a large sum on one player, whereas eight-nine years ago I would have considered it normal. If he is a success and he turns out to be the sort of player that dominates the SPL then the fee will be worth it - we need all the pace, creativity and width we can get. But, let's say we acquire de Beasley for ~£700k, or even £1.5m. I would call that a good deal. Under those cirumstances, surely a £4m player at Ibrox these days would be under intense pressure (rightly so, I guess, for that sort of money), to perform and perform bloody well at that? Unless he turns out to be another Laudrup, he'll be under threat of being labelled a flop from the word go. I'm not saying that's how it should be but, let's face it, that's how it will be. Expectations here are so high (as they should be), but in this day and age, if we spend +£4m on a player they're only going to be accepted by the supporters if they are superstars. I doubt that Faubert is. On the other hand, I'm just glad to see us looking at anyone other than the likes of McCulloch as a serious quality option!