folkestoneger

On the other hand he could be saying we are a pair of tits. You never know.

Always willing to help

I would say he is implying they are a pair of tits for saying that ( if they did)

Only 6 more to go then

If it united us we wouldn't be having this discussion

I certainly don't

My arse They represent a small group who saw an opportunity to put the boot in. All the Scots I work with down here (even the tims) did not seriously want us dead.

We're not supporting them we are supporting Scotland. Just because a few shits at the top of an organisation ( and lets not forget the main men at the SFA and SPL are fucking ENGLISH) does not mean I should give up on my country

I will never stop supporting my country no matter what the SFA clowns have done. I can't believe the attitude of some on here and doubt very much if the Rangers greats who played for or managed Scotland would agree with you.

Goram, Woods and Klos were all fantastic goalies and even though we are all ( ok most) swaying towards Goram it was a difficult choice. Lets not forget Goram was brought in to replace Woods partly because of the 3 foreigner rule in Europe ( so who knows what would have happened if not for that) and Klos played more games for us than either of the others.

You know how to spoil a good memory, don't you

Yeah the next 7 or so years were hell

Agreed. People are forgetting how good Woods was when we set the record for not conceding.

folkestoneger, on 11 August 2013 - 10:58 AM, said: Or is that the King who has already put £20 MILLION of his own money into the club? How much has Charles invested? How much have you? Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today? In what way exactly did you think my post was slagging of King? It was totally the opposite.

As he has reached deal with the authorities in SA and has yet to be convicted of anything I have no particular objection to his helping the club. After all his is not the only company that has used morally questionable, but legal ( until proven otherwise), tax policies. Whether his reputation alone would be so bad as to outweigh any financial aid rendered I simply do not know

The wording of points 2 and 3 together with the bold font used made it very easy to make an assumption it was an attack on King. Just to make it clear, like the guy who mentioned it above, I am neither pro nor anti King or Green (or anyone else except Whyte for that matter). In fact before joining this particular forum I could not have told you who was on the board (outside Walter and Green or in days gone past DM and AJ) as it is not something that has particularly interested me. I have to say in the few short months posting I have been astonished at the entrenched factions and constant criticism of other fans who simply have a different opinion on what is good for the club e.g I still have no idea what the RST has supposed to have done to receive the barracking it gets on here. I am sure that like many thousands of others I would just like someone (anyone) sensible to take charge and sort things out. If that means we cannot sign 6 or 8 new players every year until we sort out the finances then so be it.

King may not be perfect (hardly) but when did a desire to invest millions in our club become a reason for attacking him.

Or is that the King who has already put £20 MILLION of his own money into the club? How much has Charles invested? How much have you?

Got to be Chapmans

I have two hands so both

I don't come 500 miles to eat a fucking pakora, bears or otherwise, I can get in Kent I want a pie and bovril

If that £10M is a true figure including ST sales how are we meant to survive the season if we can go through £20M in a few months. Will somebody in a position of power ever give us a clear answer

Can't agree more. We will never forget the scum's reaction to Durrant

No

NO