Davie2909 21 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 http://msnsport.skysports.com/story/0,1952...5424777,00.html Dont know why we signed him in the first place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Graham Smith was always back up, could this be an indication that McGregor is to stay? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 could this be an indication that McGregor is to stay? I'd say so, but you never know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KERRZO 5 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Graeme Smith leaving will have no bearing on whether Greegs stays or goes I think. Smith has never played before apart from maybe once so his situation will not impact upon McGregor's as Smith will not need to replaced whereas Greegs would Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,710 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Be stupid selling Shagger just to buy another GK. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Already a thread on this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Be stupid selling Shagger just to buy another GK. Why? We could do with someone who'd be decent back up to Alexander. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unit123 14 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 think the lad never had a chance to be fair, rangers have always had world class no1's. he is still young in keeper terms also! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BryanRfc 1 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 he stays couple of streets away from me pointless info but awell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FUDGIE52 9 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 think the lad never had a chance to be fair, rangers have always had world class no1's. he is still young in keeper terms also! You must be way to young to remember Peter McCloy and Stewart Kennedy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueNoseAdam 0 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 yea he had no chance in getting no1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedarvelmarvel 795 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 think the lad never had a chance to be fair, rangers have always had world class no1's. he is still young in keeper terms also! You must be way to young to remember Peter McCloy and Stewart Kennedy. thank f some one agrees ,big peter was a liability and stewart was at best decent but he lost his concentration too easily Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,630 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 If he wanted first team football he shouldn't have signed for us.. He was never going to get a game (see also: Roy Carroll) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts