ger50champ 300 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 He doesn't speak for me.How did you become one of the mods with such a close mind????????????????????????????????????? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 he's not head of the rst.He would beg to differ. Therein lies the problem with the RST in its present minority status. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 the banks that isolated the bad debt aren't in admin. md also doesn't say he's the head of the rst.Haven't listened nor will I , so have to ask you if he corrected them on that statement as he never corrected Shareen Nanjani when she introduced him as a Director of the rst. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAP1872 138 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 No issues with MD but he was very swift to boot miller into touch and promote TBK's bid as thee bid. That says enough to me about his own agenda being promoted rather than Rangers through this interview Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordfletch 4 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 seems that some on here and followfollow feel that rangers take second place to their squabbles and personality clashes. are your differences worth the death of rangers ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Can't listen to it. Can you give a summary?says miller is going down the newco route. says the 3 fans groups support the blue knights. says he hopes the fans will back a share issue given the alternative is liquidation and we can raise 15 to 30 million to revatalise our club. says he would like it if celtc were in our position but realistically without either of us the spl is fucked. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmon 1 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Ask Dingwall what he done with the money he got for all the television appearances. Fat Cunt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 How did you become one of the mods with such a close mind?????????????????????????????????????I answered an advert by CanadaReady some years ago.It read:"WANTED; A close-minded individual with no scruples whatsoever. Prepared to work late (and weekends) for no pay. Must be clean externally and internally and kind to pets. Lastly, you will not follow any Rangers Media party line - you will think and speak for yourself."I got the job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Haven't listened nor will I , so have to ask you if he corrected them on that statement as he never corrected Shareen Nanjani when she introduced him as a Director of the rst.not even sure he heard it but no he didn't waste any time on trivialities like correcting a guy giving him air time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prytz tick 2 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 No issues with MD but he was very swift to boot miller into touch and promote TBK's bid as thee bid. That says enough to me about his own agenda being promoted rather than Rangers through this interview Might that not be because Miller = newco and TBK = survival? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhailichenko 90 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 says miller is going down the newco route. says the 3 fans groups support the blue knights. says he hopes the fans will back a share issue given the alternative is liquidation and we can raise 15 to 30 million to revatalise our club. says he would like it if celtc were in our position but realistically without either of us the spl is fucked.Cheers, GS. Can't really argue with it. I can't understand the difference between what Miller has said and NewCo. Hopefully someone can explain it in layman's terms. As long as the business plan is sound a share issue is a good idea. They have been in a similar position. The difference is that back then the Scottish game may have survived without them whereas now it can't survive without either of us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 not even sure he heard it but no he didn't waste any time on trivialities like correcting a guy giving him air time.I believe you many many many ,many wouldn't Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Might that not be because Miller = newco and TBK = survival?How do you know this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCLACHLAN1 49 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 David Edgar was brilliant. Dingwall isnt Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 David Edgar was brilliant. Dingwall isntHave you tried the wide-angled lense? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSifter 181 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 David Edgar was brilliant. Dingwall isntAlways amazing that someone that was willing to turn his coat and condemn his children to Roman Catholicism spoke so well. I always thought he'd end up at Parkhead in some shape or form. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_ger 1,454 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 the banks that isolated the bad debt aren't in admin. md also doesn't say he's the head of the rst.The banks were insolvent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Well, that's up to you.Once again he conducted himself well and spoke eloquently on the clubs behalf... And who appointed him the CLUBS spokesman. It's bad enough people think he speaks for the fans but you seem to be expanding his , well, expansive self worth!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAP1872 138 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Might that not be because Miller = newco and TBK = survival?He said what Miller was going to do was illegal and rubbish'd it then the rest of the interview was all TBK. I'm not professing to know what is best for Rangers but i'm certainly not going to go by that interview, seems to me his own agenda was the topic and not Rangers.Why didn't he mention BK or Ng? They have took a step back just as TBK has.... and is what Miller plans actually illegal? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger50champ 300 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I answered an advert by CanadaReady some years ago.It read:"WANTED; A close-minded individual with no scruples whatsoever. Prepared to work late (and weekends) for no pay. Must be clean externally and internally and kind to pets. Lastly, you will not follow any Rangers Media party line - you will think and speak for yourself."I got the job.fair answer mate but you can be brutal at times and very very very repetitive with your anti fellow bears stance.With so many enemies why not give them some of your words of wisdom Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 The banks were insolvent.but not in admin. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 fair answer mate but you can be brutal at times and very very very repetitive with your anti fellow bears stance.With so many enemies why not give them some of your words of wisdom CB in anti fellow bears Accusation : lol: welcome to my world - seen many an accusation on RM but this is by far the coolest Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_ger 1,454 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 but not in admin.Why does that matter? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Why does that matter?means its not relevant to our situation re cutting away the bad debt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 fair answer mate but you can be brutal at times and very very very repetitive with your anti fellow bears stance.With so many enemies why not give them some of your words of wisdom My opinion is of no greater consequence than your opinion, or any other Bear's opinion on RM - and therein lies the difference between us and the individual in question. He thinks his opinion matters.His opinion is sought (touted for, possibly?) by the media these days as if it represents the majority of the Rangers support.I suggest it does not.I repeat - he doesn't speak for me.(Sorry if that's not what you expect of an RM Admin-type, but, hey-ho....there ya' go. ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.