nachothelegend 1,932 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I don't Trust the Trust ,ha ha but, we do need to see the details of all the Bids, and then we can Judge this guy through this sorry situation.My question to him would be if Bill NG or Brian Kennedys Bids where better than TBK and Ticketus Bids. Would he support them?I wonder. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_ger 1,454 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 means its not relevant to our situation re cutting away the bad debt.I disagree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 My opinion is of no greater consequence than your opinion, or any other Bear's opinion on RM - and therein lies the difference between us and the individual in question. He thinks his opinion matters.His opinion is sought (touted for, possibly?) by the media these days as if it represents the majority of the Rangers support.I suggest it does not.I repeat - he doesn't speak for me.(Sorry if that's not what you expect of an RM Admin-type, but, hey-ho....there ya' go. )Damm I agree with you again except that my opinion is more important than your opinion ........... To me ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prytz tick 2 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 ... and is what Miller plans actually illegal?The use of the word illegal was perhaps inadvisable because it implies that there is an element of criminality to the proposed transaction. It might have been better to have stated that what Miller proposes does not comply with the requirements of the UK Companies Act. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,006 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 but not in admin.Only coz the gov and tax payer bailed before they closed they were too far gone for admin. Not every poorly operating company goes admin before going bust. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 The use of the word illegal was perhaps inadvisable because it implies that there is an element of criminality to the proposed transaction. It might have been better to have stated that what Miller proposes does not comply with the requirements of the UK Companies Act.so its impossible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,546 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Thats the attitude to have Rangers stand on the brink and you try to slag someone actually doing something about it. Ah well. Btw before the usual brigade start quoting me dont bother, i have no interest in getting into debates, my feelings all things RST have been made clear on here. However if TBK/BK can rescue us and keep both Rangers FC and the parent company alive then i will be happy with that.Dingwall etc have their faults but fuck me if its a case of knowing what you are getting compared to whats on offer i know what i want.if they were going to rescue us mate then they would have done so by nowthe fact that P Murray put together a consortium of supposed rangers men, and their bid faltered when ticketus apparently dealt with someone else would indicate that the blue knights were mostly talk Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Anyway if BK and TBK both have Rangers best interests at heart , why can't they join forces and blow any other bid out the way , giving them preffered status .FFS these guys need their heads looked at now . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 so its impossible.I'm sure his lawyers haven't even taken a look at the proposal. Not that he knows anything about running a business in the UK. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I disagree.I see that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I'm sure his lawyers haven't even taken a look at the proposal. Not that he knows anything about running a business in the UK.so your saying it is possible? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I'm sure his lawyers haven't even taken a look at the proposal. Not that he knows anything about running a business in the UK.I am sure he may be able to afford a wee consultation with a scots lawyer ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stfu 596 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 He would beg to differ. Therein lies the problem with the RST in its present minority status.This is the most accurate post on here for some time.MD only cares about MD.Try asking him when the RST are going to consult its members about TBK's and let me know how you get on?Try asking him why he is only too happy to jump into bed with ticketus and let me know how you get on?He is a dictator who has manipulated people at the RST and is an absolute control freak when you ask questions he does not like on his forum.The reason that I came to forums such as RM and GersNet is because I can not trust a man who treats members of the RST and his forum with the same respect that David Murray treated us.Ironic, considering it was the Govanhill Gub that opened my eyes to David Murray in the first place.So I am confidant that MD will say all he needs to to keep himself in the limelight for another wee while or at least until Mans world get a club blazer in his size. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger50champ 300 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 My opinion is of no greater consequence than your opinion, or any other Bear's opinion on RM - and therein lies the difference between us and the individual in question. He thinks his opinion matters.His opinion is sought (touted for, possibly?) by the media these days as if it represents the majority of the Rangers support.I suggest it does not.I repeat - he doesn't speak for me.(Sorry if that's not what you expect of an RM Admin-type, but, hey-ho....there ya' go. )Just change the record mate. That's all I would urge .He will be irrelevant if things go tits up Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 This is the most accurate post on here for some time.MD only cares about MD.Try asking him when the RST are going to consult its members about TBK's and let me know how you get on?Try asking him why he is only too happy to jump into bed with ticketus and let me know how you get on?He is a dictator who has manipulated people at the RST and is an absolute control freak when you ask questions he does not like on his forum.The reason that I came to forums such as RM and GersNet is because I can not trust a man who treats members of the RST and his forum with the same respect that David Murray treated us.Ironic, considering it was the Govanhill Gub that opened my eyes to David Murray in the first place.So I am confidant that MD will say all he needs to to keep himself in the limelight for another wee while or at least until Mans world get a club blazer in his size.Maybe he could pick up Murray's at the thrift. May need a stop by the tailor on the way to the ground.........oh yeah, he doesn't get out to matches. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted April 20, 2012 Author Share Posted April 20, 2012 .. And who appointed him the CLUBS spokesman. It's bad enough people think he speaks for the fans but you seem to be expanding his , well, expansive self worth!!I wasn't aware that anyone appointed him as club spokesman.And the rest of your pish is exactly what I'd expect of you - idiot babble from RM's ultimate empty vessel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I wasn't aware that anyone appointed him as club spokesman.And the rest of your pish is exactly what I'd expect of you - idiot babble from RM's ultimate empty vessel.You need to remember or at least re-read your own post before babbling away any more Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I wasn't aware that anyone appointed him as club spokesman.And the rest of your pish is exactly what I'd expect of you - idiot babble from RM's ultimate empty vessel.That cunt and his minions are picking fights they can't win. How terrible of people to take them to task.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted April 20, 2012 Author Share Posted April 20, 2012 That cunt and his minions are picking fights they can't win. How terrible of people to take them to task....I have no idea which 'cunt' you are referring to. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I have no idea which 'cunt' you are referring to.There are a fair few of them, aren't there? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted April 20, 2012 Author Share Posted April 20, 2012 You need to remember or at least re-read your own post before babbling away any moreExplain yourself, then, with a degree of clarity that I can understand. I'm giving no credence to the complete pish you offered earlier - bumblings of a fool.Try again if you feel so compelled, but be clear so I understand what exactly it is you want to say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted April 20, 2012 Author Share Posted April 20, 2012 There are a fair few of them, aren't there?I still don't know who you mean. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 I still don't know who you mean.Trolling Moses is trolling. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Well, that's up to you.Once again he conducted himself well and spoke eloquently on the clubs behalf.Your quote above .., you imply md spoke eloquently on the clubs behalf - do you not even understand what you write? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted April 20, 2012 Author Share Posted April 20, 2012 Trolling Moses is trolling.I'm not. As in really not. Did you mean BP9? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.