scarkev 3,540 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Why would anybody want to raise their head above the pulpit ever again?This....it has been proven time and again that no matter who is asked to give their view, what they say or how the act the same jealousy, distrust, small mindedness and obsession will consume some amongst our support! Quite sad really! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 This....it has been proven time and again that no matter who is asked to give their view, what they say or how the act the same jealousy, distrust, small mindedness and obsession will consume some amongst our support! Quite sad really!I have read this several times yet i see nothing to back this up.Davie Edgar got little but praise. Most thought he was fantastic, in his role. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 no, seeing as Jim Traynor seems to do fuck all, he should get out and canvas the fans opinion before putting it to the press and earn a fucking wage for once.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I'd go for this, well spoken and was good with the media, and unlike Dingwall I dont think he'd make a complete arse of us all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I have read this several times yet i see nothing to back this up.Davie Edgar got little but praise. Most thought he was fantastic, in his role.Until he said something you didn't agree with and then the witchhunt and name calling would begin! Even in this thread a number of posters have indicated they wouldn't be happy with him as a spokesman....until some people grow out of this mentality of trying to knock down anyone who's views don't match theirs we would be better off with no spokesperson.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Until he said something you didn't agree with and then the witchhunt and name calling would begin! Even in this thread a number of posters have indicated they wouldn't be happy with him as a spokesman....until some people grow out of this mentality of trying to knock down anyone who's views don't match theirs we would be better off with no spokesperson....well i never seen anything on either FF or VB slating himmost thought he was doing a fantastic jobeven when they didn't totally agree with himto be fair the online support was probably less fragmented, than now, but DE got noting but praise from what i read. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,324 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 well i never seen anything on either FF or VB slating himmost thought he was doing a fantastic jobeven when they didn't totally agree with himto be fair the online support was probably less fragmented, than now, but DE got noting but praise from what i read.Different times now, even the most level headed posters, rightly or wrongly, see agendas and ulterior motives in everything everyone says. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baxters11 8 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Another wage for Rangers to pay out ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherster Perry 1977 18 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Until he said something you didn't agree with and then the witchhunt and name calling would begin! Even in this thread a number of posters have indicated they wouldn't be happy with him as a spokesman....until some people grow out of this mentality of trying to knock down anyone who's views don't match theirs we would be better off with no spokesperson....Thats a given. However, it would be the same for everyone.Personally I think Chris Graham has responded well to most of the flack he has taken - He is also a little unfortunate to be cast as an official spokesman, when her clearly is not.David Edgar took bundles of stick from Rangers fans when he was in the public eye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Why are so many people wanting to take our club backwards in stead of forwards.We need to learn from the mistakes of the past. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarneyRabble 126 Posted August 22, 2013 Author Share Posted August 22, 2013 Why are so many people wanting to take our club backwards in stead of forwards.We need to learn from the mistakes of the past.In which ways was Mr Edgar a mistake? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 David Edgar does not need the hassle, He was threatened by David Murray for speaking out against him, He was also shafted by people he considered his friends. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Just reading the Graham Twitter thread on the other forum. A poster sums it up nicely. All our spokesmen know as much as the rest of us but the Earls actually know more. I have always said the first bit but have never really thought about the second part. Its true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ab4113 124 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I always thought the guy handled the media very well. I don't think Chris Graham is very good at that. I do think that Mark Dingwall does well in front of the camera. My mate sits beside Davie Edgar at the games and said he is a sound guy but from what I can gather there was a lot of crap in his personal life away from the Rangers side so I don't think he would be interested in any such role again.Yeah, him and his wee trust pals were coke heids, and thought more of themselves than rangers, maybe thats how the trust accounts always seemed a bit dodgy, Now i will await the usual on slaught of shite from his wee pals Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Yeah, him and his wee trust pals were coke heids, and thought more of themselves than rangers, maybe thats how the trust accounts always seemed a bit dodgy, Now i will await the usual on slaught of shite from his wee pals Don't know mate but I will ask the question at the East Fife game if I don't catch him at the Airdrie game. Just told me he had personal problems. Drugs seem to be a bigger problem than drink these days. Unfortunate but I have no sympathy for folk who take them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarneyRabble 126 Posted August 22, 2013 Author Share Posted August 22, 2013 Yeah, him and his wee trust pals were coke heids, and thought more of themselves than rangers, maybe thats how the trust accounts always seemed a bit dodgy, Now i will await the usual on slaught of shite from his wee palsNot entirely convinced that Mr Edgar had anything to do with the RST's accounts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RST 19 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Yeah, him and his wee trust pals were coke heids, and thought more of themselves than rangers, maybe thats how the trust accounts always seemed a bit dodgy, Now i will await the usual on slaught of shite from his wee palsWhat a load of crap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Yeah, him and his wee trust pals were coke heids, and thought more of themselves than rangers, maybe thats how the trust accounts always seemed a bit dodgy, Now i will await the usual on slaught of shite from his wee palsSee 'thehost'.....doesn't matter who it is or what they do someone who doesn't agree with what they say will find away to assassinate the guys character....are any of these accusations substantiated? Not that it matters.....the rumour is enough for some! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherster Perry 1977 18 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Yeah, him and his wee trust pals were coke heids, and thought more of themselves than rangers, maybe thats how the trust accounts always seemed a bit dodgy, Now i will await the usual on slaught of shite from his wee palsThat is a truly awful collection of nonsense to post on a messageboard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 He used to agitate me to be honest but looking back I'd take him before the usual crop of shite we see being our mouthpieces and in wee bits of power when it comes to platforms they have,I think he's been out the game too long though. Does he even go to games anymore? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Yeah, him and his wee trust pals were coke heids, and thought more of themselves than rangers, maybe thats how the trust accounts always seemed a bit dodgy, Now i will await the usual on slaught of shite from his wee palsBit slanderous that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Bit slanderous thatAny more slanderous than some of the claims made against other individuals? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Any more slanderous than some of the claims made against other individuals?Nupe.I've not seen examples that involves personal drug habitsThe stuff about the bounced cheques with Dingwall was actually proven, was it not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ab4113 124 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Nupe.I've not seen examples that involves personal drug habitsThe stuff about the bounced cheques with Dingwall was actually proven, was it not?Yes, but some will still deny it, as for RST, last week re Mark Dingwall (assault) you went quiet on that one ??Have we all forotten what has happened at the Trust, since the Cabel took over, at Least David Edgar had the decency to retire from it all , unlike others who will continually suck the blood out of that organisation, after all the hard work by others in getting it off the ground.So , forget all the rubbish/scandalous pish, what these runts have done to our club is the disgrace, not my comments Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Yes, but some will still deny it, as for RST, last week re Mark Dingwall (assault) you went quiet on that one ??Have we all forotten what has happened at the Trust, since the Cabel took over, at Least David Edgar had the decency to retire from it all , unlike others who will continually suck the blood out of that organisation, after all the hard work by others in getting it off the ground.So , forget all the rubbish/scandalous pish, what these runts have done to our club is the disgrace, not my commentsYou've got the wrong guy mate. I'm as anti FF/RST/Dingwall as they come Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts