Rangers v Celtic

[*Manticore* 1,893]

here's the complete record:

We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.

But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?

Any thoughts?

Here fishy fishy

[papaguy51 912]

here's the complete record:

We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.

But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?

Any thoughts?

Here fishy fishy

Did Celtic not hammer us in the 1st ever game between the sides?

[*Manticore* 1,893]

here's the complete record:

We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.

But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?

Any thoughts?

Here fishy fishy

Did Celtic not hammer us in the 1st ever game between the sides?

5-2 I think.

[Bazza 21]

There can be no excuses. The stats speak for themselves.

[Chambo 197]

here's the complete record:

We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.

But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?

Any thoughts?

Here fishy fishy

Surely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed?

[Frankie 505]

The first catch of the day is always the tastiest...

[*Manticore* 1,893]

here's the complete record:

We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.

But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?

Any thoughts?

Here fishy fishy

Surely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed?

It's all of the OF matches.

[papaguy51 912]

Surely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed?

I think he meant we had an unfair advantage of 15 years preparation.

That's why I said that it could have meant nothing, as they done us 5-2 in the 1st ever OF game!

[Bazza 21]

here's the complete record:

We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.

But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?

Any thoughts?

Here fishy fishy

Surely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed?

I thought that too.

I think its more to do with us being an established club when they first came into being...

[*Manticore* 1,893]

Surely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed?

I think he meant we had an unfair advantage of 15 years preparation.

No I didn't I was just fishing ya bassa!

As you can see if you look really closely at the first post....

[papaguy51 912]

No I didn't I was just fishing ya bassa!

As you can see if you look really closely at the first post....

Bassa is it?

I'll have you

[minstral 5,375]

manticore you have caught plenty of fish in your time you are a top class fisherman.

[Poetry_In_Blue 1,043]

We are, and always will be number 1

[J_RFC87 762]

If someone had the time. they could work out for each decade, how many games both teams have won over the sample period. Then you could analysis the periods both teams were better and can exclude the first decade if its irrelvent.

[Briton 394]

Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days.

[*Manticore* 1,893]

Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days.

Well you can say that.

But they never had a chance to beat us for 15 years, surely that must affect the figures?

C'mon, take a wee bite, you know you want to...

[Poetry_In_Blue 1,043]

Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days.

Well you can say that.

But they never had a chance to beat us for 15 years, surely that must affect the figures?

C'mon, take a wee bite, you know you want to...

Don't see how, as the figures are based on Rangers vs Celtic...

[*Manticore* 1,893]

Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days.

Well you can say that.

But they never had a chance to beat us for 15 years, surely that must affect the figures?

C'mon, take a wee bite, you know you want to...

Don't see how, as the figures are based on Rangers vs Celtic...

At last.

[dummiesoot 16,181]

hook line and sinker Manticore, well done my friend.

[*Manticore* 1,893]

hook line and sinker Manticore, well done my friend.

I had to put some work in to land that one.

Now, what was I saying about David Murray :pipehorse:

[delparlane 5,805]

Kudos to you for doing your homework Manticore, but I didn't need a table to tell me we are the

better side.