Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 detained for questioning is actually called 'detained for questioning' wihereas arrested is under a charge and will appear in court - probably tomorrow morning.Where do you read this crap? Detained for questioning as u call it is detained under section 14. That also means arrested. When you get charged you get charged under section "whatever" in relation to that charge. Arrested means that they can take you to the station for questioning/ charging/ breathalizing/ DNA/ finger printing etc etc etc...Never heard of arrested without charge? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Fraud is the first charge ( that came from serving police officer still on duty as I post this)Hope you reported him for releasing confidential data?Scumbag polis breaking the law again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Think this is done when the PF have given the cops permissionNa, that's up to the custody sergeant. The first the pf will see it is today when he will decide whether to oppose bail or not. Lets hope he opposes it and the sheriff agrees. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,258 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 If Whyte , Green and the rest are found guilty does that mean we get stripped of titles ??Don't think they were ever on the team sheet Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 I'm praying the 3 cunts get remanded.Sexy football, these cunts charged and remanded.Now that would be a nice start to the day fellow bearsI can say with almost 100% certainly that none of them will be remanded. Unless there is something else we don't know about. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Murray is to blame for running up the massive debts in the first place albeit these were being serviced and at the time were sustainable. He's also to blame for using the EBT scheme in the first place and then shiting his drawers when it seemed there was a possibility that it was illegal and might result in a massive fine/repayment of taxes. This caused him to drop his drawers to the first person who showed any serious interest in the club and flog the lot to Whyte for a quid. Whyte is then responsible for failing to pay PAYE and ultimately admin and liquidation. While administration was a direct result of Whyte's actions, I think HMRC might have been more receptive to a CVA if the BTC wasn't also hanging over us which they were confident of winning. So in short, Whyte is responsible for the actions that ultimately led to Admin & Liquidation however none of this would have happened if Murray hadn't sold to him in the first place and the only reason he did this (IMO) was because he was terrified that they BTC was going to bite him on the arse. As far as I'm concerned Murray is as big a culprit in this as anyone else, if not bigger.This is in no way defending dm ,time will prove he was forced to sell to whyte by our banker friends,he was trying to sell us for a few years but due to the fake tax case nobody would touch us,Murray group operated ebt in lots of companies and won every appeal that why he was confident of winning the btc,the problem dm had was poor timing ,the btc hit us right at the start of the credit crunch and murrays empire was hit very badly almost wiped out and was in no position to hold his ground The btc frightened off a lot of buyers hence no normal business would take us over,that's when this crook whyte decided we were ripe for raping then screwed us over post admin to set up himself,thankfully now the bastards have had their collars felt and will imo get prosecuted. ,how much time they do will not fit the crime howeverFortunately for us we are heading in the right direction and possibly in a better direction now than if we had been sold to rangers men post admin,one thing for sure our next big win will be sweeter than the sweetest sweet in sweet land on sweet day Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Most people would think that, but the amount of legalese and jurisprudence that surrounds the law fucks everyone one. Lawyers need, and all professionals, their own language to keep out the layman. As far as I'm concerned, he's up in front of a judge, he's been charged.That's not to say he's going to get done though!He's appearing in front of a Sheriff (not a judge) in private, which means it's indictment. That is good because it means that there is more chance of getting remanded, but is by no way a guarantee. The judge needs to consider seriousness of the offense, length of conviction if found guilty, previous convictions, risk of re-offending, risk of absconding and whether the PF opposes bail. If all of these are low, he will be bailed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp9 753 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 According to the bbc 'angry scenes amid rangers 'fraud' case' Looks like some cunt with a camera fell over HWFG Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuggy 1,308 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Looks like some Bears are after blood! Mayhem.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-34127507 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSM 20,892 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Will he be allowed to return to France or have they taken his passport? Who'll feed his horses? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,852 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Angry scenes cause 1 guy cunted it..typical bbc the Amsterdam riots must of been like the beginning of a new world war Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cr3_bear 15,068 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Is that cunt whyte no up the day aswell Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 21,028 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 He's appearing in front of a Sheriff (not a judge) in private, which means it's indictment. That is good because it means that there is more chance of getting remanded, but is by no way a guarantee. The judge needs to consider seriousness of the offense, length of conviction if found guilty, previous convictions, risk of re-offending, risk of absconding and whether the PF opposes bail. If all of these are low, he will be bailed.Not an Indictment yet. It is petition just now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falkirk bear 1,020 Posted September 2, 2015 Author Share Posted September 2, 2015 This is just the tip of the iceberg as the saying goes, word has it that they wanted Green to be be remanded in custody as there is more charges to follow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Kool Blue 139 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Is that cunt whyte no up the day aswellYeah, but I'm sure I heard that he's giving evidence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cr3_bear 15,068 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Yeah, but I'm sure I heard that he's giving evidence.So he still has to come out aswell? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,294 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Angry scenes cause 1 guy cunted it..typical bbc the Amsterdam riots must of been like the beginning of a new world war Those were some pretty angry scenes, spastic-boy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Goudie 42 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Yeah, but I'm sure I heard that he's giving evidence.Whyte was arrested and held in court too. He'll be part of the conspiracy charge. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Not an Indictment yet. It is petition just now.Aye, but he will get his indictment as soon as it's ready. Any idea what was on the petition? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falkirk bear 1,020 Posted September 3, 2015 Author Share Posted September 3, 2015 Update on my posts, it seems that Ahmed ( who I believe was close to green is pretty soon to feel the full force of the law!!! And sample shall I put it a traditional breakfast!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.