Boab 73 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 We were up against a team who weren't afraid to play football. Did we struggle or not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dado 334 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Caught napping for the goal, thought we handled them well enough apart from that. Thought Papac had a good game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bauba30 1 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 We were up against a team who weren't afraid to play football. Did we struggle or not? Think we coped fine, when you consider we leaked one goal, that was actually offside. Allan never needed to make any huge saves. So as much possession as Well won from our midfield, we kept them at bay well enough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,262 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Thought the defence was very good today especially with the lack of midfield protection,back 4 all did a lot of good work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Thought the defence was very good today especially with the lack of midfield protection,back 4 all did a lot of good work. Agreed. The only thing that I would say is they got behind our full backs a bit too often. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delparlane 5,758 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Thought the defence was very good today especially with the lack of midfield protection,back 4 all did a lot of good work. Agreed - I honestly thought M'well might overrun us at one point in the game, but our back curtain stood firm (and I do believe their goal was indeed offside). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KERRZO 5 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I know this may seem controversial but Weir's days have now been and gone. We need to find a long term partner for Cuellar as Weir is done. He is too slow and immbile now to play at the breakneck pace of the spl. Contoversial some may say but jus my opinion!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Weir and Papac were poor for their goal, so yes, I do have issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delparlane 5,758 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I know this may seem controversial but Weir's days have now been and gone. We need to find a long term partner for Cuellar as Weir is done. He is too slow and immbile now to play at the breakneck pace of the spl. Contoversial some may say but jus my opinion!!! You're entitled to it. I happen to disagree 100%, but that's what makes life interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KERRZO 5 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I know this may seem controversial but Weir's days have now been and gone. We need to find a long term partner for Cuellar as Weir is done. He is too slow and immbile now to play at the breakneck pace of the spl. Contoversial some may say but jus my opinion!!! You're entitled to it. I happen to disagree 100%, but that's what makes life interesting. Thats what we're here for m8, a good old banter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Weir DID look slow at times today, but generally he positions himself so well that he manages fine. He can still win headers too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Of course Webster was the replacement, but we're still waiting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saudibear 0 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I had high hopes for Webster but he has only been fit to play 1 game since January and that's worrying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 It is isn't it, there's no bigger dead loss in football than someone who is never fit to play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan 0 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I know this may seem controversial but Weir's days have now been and gone. We need to find a long term partner for Cuellar as Weir is done. He is too slow and immbile now to play at the breakneck pace of the spl. Contoversial some may say but jus my opinion!!! agreed, needs to take a step back IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I thought that Papac was poor at the goal, he let his player go & Weir tried to make up but couldn't. Barrign the goal, though, i thought the defence coped well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilcockney 4 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I thought that Papac was poor at the goal, he let his player go & Weir tried to make up but couldn't. Barrign the goal, though, i thought the defence coped well. Spot there Ace, didnt look like Papac even gave Weir a shout to warn him about the runner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Defence was shakey at times. It wasn't bad, just not as solid as it has been imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 762 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 I thought that Papac was poor at the goal, he let his player go & Weir tried to make up but couldn't. Barrign the goal, though, i thought the defence coped well. Nein, it was Thomson's fault, never shut down his man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I thought that Papac was poor at the goal, he let his player go & Weir tried to make up but couldn't. Barrign the goal, though, i thought the defence coped well. Nein, it was Thomson's fault, never shut down his man Are you not getting mixed up with Whittaker ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilcockney 4 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I thought that Papac was poor at the goal, he let his player go & Weir tried to make up but couldn't. Barrign the goal, though, i thought the defence coped well. Nein, it was Thomson's fault, never shut down his man Thompson was at fault J but Papac was still poor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts