bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 He may be bored, but he shows no respect for the people interviewing him. I am his biggest fan (as far as snooker goes) but he is like a little boy trying to impress his mate. Pathetic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Newells Sexist Army 2 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 He hasn't lost it, he's always been like that, the arrogant cockney twat. Gets away with it because he's just about the only non-boring bastard in snooker and they need him for the interest he generates, plus his family are gangster scum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 28, 2008 Author Share Posted March 28, 2008 He hasn't lost it, he's always been like that, the arrogant cockney twat. Gets away with it because he's just about the only non-boring bastard in snooker and they need him for the interest he generates, plus his family are gangster scum. He hasn't always been like that - I've never seen him insult interviewers like that before. He has made many mistakes, and not exactly covered himself in glory, but this is a new level in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barkie 201 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Met him in a hotel bar years ago he made it very clear he hated scots he was pished beyond belief and nearly wrecked a xmas party going on in the hotel. I was going to chin him but the security at the hotel were escorting him back to his room all night but he kept comming back slurring and making a tit of himself. no wonder he is off the drink he is a 1st class prick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,707 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Met him in a hotel bar years ago he made it very clear he hated scots he was pished beyond belief and nearly wrecked a xmas party going on in the hotel. I was going to chin him but the security at the hotel were escorting him back to his room all night but he kept comming back slurring and making a tit of himself. no wonder he is off the drink he is a 1st class prick. He want to ba gangster like mammy and daddy, a fcukin wanker. He's not off anythin a load of shite, if anythin he's takin more than ever. He'll come a cropper. ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchy 0 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 i am not a fan of Ronnie O Sullivan really, but i have to say i find that clip very funny indeed! lol He is obviously totally bored and fed up with the pres sconference and decides to take the piss a little. I get the feeling that if he gets fined or banned, he will just stick his 2 fingers up at the Snooker governing bodies and say "cheerio" .... cos theyneed Ronnie O Sullivan more than he needs them. Hes made his money, is set for life, but is still one of the best (if not the best) to watch playing snooker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 i am not a fan of Ronnie O Sullivan really, but i have to say i find that clip very funny indeed! lol He is obviously totally bored and fed up with the pres sconference and decides to take the piss a little. By inviting them to explore his genitals? You can take the piss without actually being outright vulgar. And I'm quite sure plenty of sportsmen have been bored on a press conference and haven't resorted to references to sexual activities on his chopper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 28, 2008 Author Share Posted March 28, 2008 i am not a fan of Ronnie O Sullivan really, but i have to say i find that clip very funny indeed! lol He is obviously totally bored and fed up with the pres sconference and decides to take the piss a little. By inviting them to explore his genitals? You can take the piss without actually being outright vulgar. And I'm quite sure plenty of sportsmen have been bored on a press conference and haven't resorted to references to sexual activities on his chopper. Exactly Danny, he is acting like a little kid. It's really disappointing to see, given that I admire his snooker so much. His 5 min 20 s 147 break is the best snooker I will ever see in my life, and to see him acting like that is disappointing to say the least :no: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 the guys a prick, snooker was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 28, 2008 Author Share Posted March 28, 2008 It amazes me the strength of feeling this generates in people, and the sheer hatred Ronnie receives. His problems are much the same as Gazza's, yet Gazza is still revered as a God. Incidentally, that is not meant to get at Gazza at all, the man is a legend in my eyes, but he has had problems with addiction and depression, same as Ronnie. They were both given an amazing talent for the game they loved, and both have abused the privileges they have been given. the guys a prick, snooker was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him the guys a prick, football was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him could have been written about Gazza (but not by me). Can someone explain the difference to me? Edit: tin hat on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 It amazes me the strength of feeling this generates in people, and the sheer hatred Ronnie receives. His problems are much the same as Gazza's, yet Gazza is still revered as a God. Incidentally, that is not meant to get at Gazza at all, the man is a legend in my eyes, but he has had problems with addiction and depression, same as Ronnie. They were both given an amazing talent for the game they loved, and both have abused the privileges they have been given. the guys a prick, snooker was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him the guys a prick, football was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him could have been written about Gazza (but not by me). Can someone explain the difference to me? Edit: tin hat on gazza is a prick aswell, but i love him for what he did for us. He has problems much like ronnie does, they both need help. football certainly didn't lose any appeal without gazza in it. ronnie is a great snooker player of that there's no doubt and i don't hate him - just think he's a prick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 28, 2008 Author Share Posted March 28, 2008 It amazes me the strength of feeling this generates in people, and the sheer hatred Ronnie receives. His problems are much the same as Gazza's, yet Gazza is still revered as a God. Incidentally, that is not meant to get at Gazza at all, the man is a legend in my eyes, but he has had problems with addiction and depression, same as Ronnie. They were both given an amazing talent for the game they loved, and both have abused the privileges they have been given. the guys a prick, snooker was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him the guys a prick, football was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him could have been written about Gazza (but not by me). Can someone explain the difference to me? Edit: tin hat on gazza is a prick aswell, but i love him for what he did for us. He has problems much like ronnie does, they both need help. football certainly didn't lose any appeal without gazza in it. ronnie is a great snooker player of that there's no doubt and i don't hate him - just think he's a prick. Fair do's, a good and honest response Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintbob1969 1,506 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 It amazes me the strength of feeling this generates in people, and the sheer hatred Ronnie receives. His problems are much the same as Gazza's, yet Gazza is still revered as a God. Incidentally, that is not meant to get at Gazza at all, the man is a legend in my eyes, but he has had problems with addiction and depression, same as Ronnie. They were both given an amazing talent for the game they loved, and both have abused the privileges they have been given. the guys a prick, snooker was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him the guys a prick, football was around long before him and it will be around long after him - it certainly doesn't need him could have been written about Gazza (but not by me). Can someone explain the difference to me? Edit: tin hat on gazza is a prick aswell, but i love him for what he did for us. He has problems much like ronnie does, they both need help. football certainly didn't lose any appeal without gazza in it. ronnie is a great snooker player of that there's no doubt and i don't hate him - just think he's a prick. Fair do's, a good and honest response Can you imagine these stupid media twats going on and on and on at you in one language, then translations going on and on, then that's followed by the exact same question ad nauseum, f*k me but I'd be superhuman to keep it together for any length of time, he's a snooker player not a public speaker, just like many of our noted footballers, and many managers have lost it with dumb media, remember the classic Walter having that wee twat for breakfast?? Absolute class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 aye, just cos people are sportsmen it doesn't make them good public speakers or even good people. ronnie should know better - but theres something not right in his head so should he really be judged by this sort of behaviour? I think the thing that annoys people is that he just doesn't seem to care Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisVanDarche 23 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 O'Sullivan's a wanker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 28, 2008 Author Share Posted March 28, 2008 O'Sullivan's a wanker. Constructive comment, well done :clout: Explain the difference between him and Gazza again? Or do you disapprove of depression and addiction generally? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stardog 11 Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 What a twat Sullivan is. Jokes I'd expect from a 12 year old. And who's the guy always bringing up Gazza? Nothing to do with him and leave him out of it. Nice guy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkiebear 1,013 Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 O Sullivan is a scumbag who thinks he is all that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianGer 1 Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 embarassing for Britain when someone behaves in that way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Deacon 55,655 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 get a fuckin grip people. one of the best talents in sports ever to come from Britain. and your slating him for a wee comment. fuck sake. he was having a laugh and fair play to him. he's a bright spark in a sometime dull sport. get off his back. its no like he's ordered the death of all the jews in germany, or started a holiday home in jersey for unwanted kids. GET A FUCKING GRIP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coopermania 1 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 He hasn't lost it, he's always been like that, the arrogant cockney twat. Gets away with it because he's just about the only non-boring bastard in snooker and they need him for the interest he generates, plus his family are gangster scum. Totally agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCLoyal9 53 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Thought the clip was a good laugh. People will give all manner of reasons for hating O'Sullivan but they will almost always skip the main one : they are jealous of his talent. The guy might well be a twat but - a gifted twat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts