King Jela 20,361 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 8 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Yes imo, BR got himself sacked to take the tic job. No, I think MW is trying to tell the board he needs more resources, if he doesn't get them he'll walk. Just my opinion. Wow! ??????? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 56 minutes ago, King Jela said: Wow! ??????? That cunts at it. Total spastic, but don't tell him i said it. It's not nice to name call. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,725 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Rocket OP on the Well Done Rangers thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,725 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Sweetheart said: Yes imo, BR got himself sacked to take the tic job. The game's a bogey Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 5 hours ago, graeme_4 said: I know given the result and how he got sent off that this will sound mental, but up until the red card I thought he played well.  An improvement on all our CBs. Kiernan was absolutely horrendous though. I actually dont blame senderos. He should never ever have been put inthat position in the first place. he hasn't played a competitive game in months Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 11 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: The game's a bogey Point I was making was that MW might be unhappy.  It's been worked out on another thread that the board have only invested 3.5 M over 3 transfer windows. I can't see MW letting the board back out of promises again. Some fans are asking that he be sacked, imo, this may well be what MW wants if he's not allowed to buy his first choices. I would rather he stayed and got a better war chest. Something is not right in the background but I believe MW is too much of a gentleman to say what it is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
To Be A Ranger 4,032 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 2 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Point I was making was that MW might be unhappy.  It's been worked out on another thread that the board have only invested 3.5 M over 3 transfer windows. I can't see MW letting the board back out of promises again. Some fans are asking that he be sacked, imo, this may well be what MW wants if he's not allowed to buy his first choices. I would rather he stayed and got a better war chest. Something is not right in the background but I believe MW is too much of a gentleman to say what it is. Did he have 1st choices. or did he just not have a clue what he wanted? If he wanted certain players he should have stuck by them. Maybe he did and signed them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Just now, To Be A Ranger said: Did he have 1st choices. or did he just not have a clue what he wanted? If he wanted certain players he should have stuck by them. Maybe he did and signed them. The board told him whatever it takes, If that was the case he would have been able to seal the deal on some of the targets Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
To Be A Ranger 4,032 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Sweetheart said: The board told him whatever it takes, If that was the case he would have been able to seal the deal on some of the targets eh? So he had the option to sign whatever it takes but signed what we have? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 4 minutes ago, To Be A Ranger said: eh? So he had the option to sign whatever it takes but signed what we have? obviously the board have backed out of that agreement, They have only spent  3.5 M  in 3 transfer windows. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
To Be A Ranger 4,032 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Just now, Sweetheart said: obviously the board have backed out of that agreement, has only 3.5 M has been spent in 3 transfer windows. Sorry but there's nothing obvious about it. You're making out you know he had signing targets and the board backed him. Now you're saying the board backed out. If you have facts then give us them otherwise I'm beginning to see MW as Le Guen part II i.e. he told the board it would be easy but is now recognisng how hard a job it really is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 5 minutes ago, To Be A Ranger said: Sorry but there's nothing obvious about it. You're making out you know he had signing targets and the board backed him. Now you're saying the board backed out. If you have facts then give us them otherwise I'm beginning to see MW as Le Guen part II i.e. he told the board it would be easy but is now recognisng how hard a job it really is. I still believe in MW, just go back and read through old news paper articles and you'll see the statements from the board and on transfer windows. Something is not right in the back ground, that is my opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
To Be A Ranger 4,032 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Sweetheart said: I still believe in MW, just go back and read through old news paper articles and you'll see the statements from the board and or transfer windows. Something is not right in the back ground, that is my opinion. So you DON'T know if he had other targets or if the board backed him (or not). Neither do I but I do know that with the squad that is available his team selections (and signings) are questionable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 hour ago, To Be A Ranger said: So you DON'T know if he had other targets or if the board backed him (or not). Neither do I but I do know that with the squad that is available his team selections (and signings) are questionable. And that's all we can go on.  Saying he isn't getting the backing of the board is pure supposition. He could have picked a better 1st team on Saturday and didn't.  That's his call, not the boards. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 11 minutes ago, To Be A Ranger said: So you DON'T know if he had other targets or if the board backed him (or not). Neither do I but I do know that with the squad that is available his team selections (and signings) are questionable. Wasn't Nathan Cameron from Bury being reported by the Daily Mail as one of MW 1st choices? Also Josh Meekings Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
piperpete 3,186 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 35 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: obviously the board have backed out of that agreement, They have only spent  3.5 M  in 3 transfer windows. How Is It obvious ? What If  he got every player he wanted ? I dont know If thats the case same as I dont know If the board have backed out of an agreement they may have or may not have had In place. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
To Be A Ranger 4,032 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 7 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Wasn't Nathan Cameron from Bury being reported by the Daily Mail as one of MW 1st choices? Also Josh Meekings Maybe but so were dozens of others. Newspaper talk is cheap and MW agrees with me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Just now, piperpete said: How Is It obvious ? What If  he got every player he wanted ? I dont know If thats the case same as I dont know If the board have backed out of an agreement they may have or may not have had In place. Your entitled to your opinion as I am mine. I feel the board have let down MW, by stating he could have whatever it takes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Sweetheart said: Wasn't Nathan Cameron from Bury being reported by the Daily Mail as one of MW 1st choices? Also Josh Meekings So? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NixonRFC 1,334 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 13 hours ago, Sweetheart said: Yes imo, BR got himself sacked to take the tic job. No, I think MW is trying to tell the board he needs more resources, if he doesn't get them he'll walk. Just my opinion. Sweet Jesus thats the daftest post I've read on here today and given some of the crap thats been spouted that in itself is impressive. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
falkirkNS 6,298 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 did kiernan not go off cause of injury?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
To Be A Ranger 4,032 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 minute ago, falkirkNS said: did kiernan not go off cause of injury?? aye his bottle crashed Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 53 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Point I was making was that MW might be unhappy.  It's been worked out on another thread that the board have only invested 3.5 M over 3 transfer windows. I can't see MW letting the board back out of promises again. Some fans are asking that he be sacked, imo, this may well be what MW wants if he's not allowed to buy his first choices. I would rather he stayed and got a better war chest. Something is not right in the background but I believe MW is too much of a gentleman to say what it is. Despite my rantings I would rather he stayed, but he does need to change his own mind set and given adequate funds to mount a serious challenge. On your theory, that central defender again who supposedly failed a medical then it was announced for family reasons that Glasgow was too far and low and behold he signs for a club in that city in England named Athens! You may well be right. King and mini may well try and pull the wool over the eyes of the gullible, but that one was a belter. Funnily enough the king rimmers went all silent on it. Can't think why! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
piperpete 3,186 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 30 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Your entitled to your opinion as I am mine. I feel the board have let down MW, by stating he could have whatever it takes. 100%. My problem Is If that was the case why would MW sign a new contract before the 3rd window If he was lied to and had his hands tied during the first 2 ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Sweetheart said: Your entitled to your opinion as I am mine. I feel the board have let down MW, by stating he could have whatever it takes. Only MW can say otherwise. Yet he says the boards backing has been first class. Repeatedly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.