BlueMe 25,327 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Inigo said: OP must be delighted with how the thread's gone. Great publicity so far. That's the reason he added the "David and Hamish from 67 Hail Hail to discuss Leigh Griffiths" part. The same basic technique is used by the media when they attach Rangers to a negative story. It's click bait. Looking forward to next weeks thread discussing Lennys signings so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Inigo said: Dont imagine that's his target events tbh. 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: I cant imagine ANY podcast getting listened to on a supporters bus. Point being the target audience is obviously not your average bear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, BlueMe said: That's the reason he added the "David and Hamish from 67 Hail Hail to discuss Leigh Griffiths" part. The same basic technique is used by the media when they attach Rangers to a negative story. It's click bait. Looking forward to next weeks thread discussing Lennys signings so far. Can't wait for the Congratulations on #55 episode at the end of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, eejay the dj said: After 8 horrific years How any bear even wants to be consilutory regards the bheasts. It just astounds me If suck finds oot his orcs are downloading 👇😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,532 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Point being the target audience is obviously not your average bear. Dont think there is such a thing. He'll get an audience. Some will hate the idea, some will listen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, Inigo said: Dont think there is such a thing. He'll get an audience. Some will hate the idea, some will listen. There is such a thing, there is not one single Rangers fan that I know of who would entertain this cancer of a podcast. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, BlueMe said: That's the reason he added the "David and Hamish from 67 Hail Hail to discuss Leigh Griffiths" part. The same basic technique is used by the media when they attach Rangers to a negative story. It's click bait. Looking forward to next weeks thread discussing Lennys signings so far. I copied the description of the podcast from the site it's hosted on. I have zero part in writing that and couldn't be arsed changing it. You're understanding of this 'basic technique' is wildly off the mark. the David and Hamish bit being in there is for totally different reasons than those when papers include Rangers in a story. That's typically done because Rangers is an incredibly popular search term so helps boost the story's SEO score and visibility hrough search engines. They are named in the description because it fills a bit of space. We discussed their signings so far on this podcast. Not sure we'll do it again next week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Can't wait for the Congratulations on #55 episode at the end of the season. Neither can I. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, BridgeIsBlue said: There is such a thing, there is not one single Rangers fan that I know of who would entertain this cancer of a podcast. Yet literally thousands have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 5 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Point being the target audience is obviously not your average bear. It's not? So who is our target audience? You seem to know more about this than I do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterC 12,272 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 As far as I am concerned there's us, and there's them. I'm all for debates etc but the minute you involve the other lot, you know it won't be long before they are wanting things going their way and trying to shout us down. Podcasts are a waste of time for the most part, just full of folk too fond of their own voices Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMe 25,327 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, The Dude said: I copied the description of the podcast from the site it's hosted on. I have zero part in writing that and couldn't be arsed changing it. You're understanding of this 'basic technique' is wildly off the mark. the David and Hamish bit being in there is for totally different reasons than those when papers include Rangers in a story. That's typically done because Rangers is an incredibly popular search term so helps boost the story's SEO score and visibility hrough search engines. They are named in the description because it fills a bit of space. We discussed their signings so far on this podcast. Not sure we'll do it again next week. That's why i said it was "click bait", which it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,532 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, BlueMe said: That's the reason he added the "David and Hamish from 67 Hail Hail to discuss Leigh Griffiths" part. The same basic technique is used by the media when they attach Rangers to a negative story. It's click bait. Looking forward to next weeks thread discussing Lennys signings so far. Dunno. Think he added that cause that's who it is. I mean, let's face it, it's not like we couldn't work out what kind of background the Tim's on it would have. Regardless, it's all worked a treat for him. Don't mind hearing discussions about tim players in an OF fans context. Bet a large percentage of of us do it at work every day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, The Dude said: I copied the description of the podcast from the site it's hosted on. I have zero part in writing that and couldn't be arsed changing it. You're understanding of this 'basic technique' is wildly off the mark. the David and Hamish bit being in there is for totally different reasons than those when papers include Rangers in a story. That's typically done because Rangers is an incredibly popular search term so helps boost the story's SEO score and visibility hrough search engines. They are named in the description because it fills a bit of space. We discussed their signings so far on this podcast. Not sure we'll do it again next week. Next week ask them about why a European Cup win glossed over child rape for half a century, you'll soon see how quick the timid timalloy can change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,532 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: There is such a thing, there is not one single Rangers fan that I know of who would entertain this cancer of a podcast. I know plenty. I also know some that wouldn't. Rangers fans are a mixed bunch. There's no average Bear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, BlueMe said: That's why i said it was "click bait", which it is. So how does that fit with the Hamish/David bit given it's neither in the headline to entice you in (you know, like bait) and neither are likely to influence the SEO results? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: It's not? So who is our target audience? You seem to know more about this than I do. You're target audience are the cunts who will sit in a house full of rabid fenian bastards and say aye I'm a Rangers fan but only because so and so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, BridgeIsBlue said: Next week ask them about why a European Cup win glossed over child rape for half a century, you'll soon see how quick the timid timalloy can change. Why are some so obsessed with wanting to talk about sexually abusing kids? I'll just stick to talking about football on a podcast about football tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMe 25,327 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Inigo said: Dunno. Think he added that cause that's who it is. I mean, let's face it, it's not like we couldn't work out what kind of background the Tim's on it would have. Regardless, it's all worked a treat for him. Don't mind hearing discussions about tim players in an OF fans context. Bet a large percentage of of us do it at work every day. I don't listen to any podcasts tbh, not my thing at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, The Dude said: Why are some so obsessed with wanting to talk about sexually abusing kids? I'll just stick to talking about football on a podcast about football tbh. A bawhair away from "muh point scoring", so close. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, MisterC said: As far as I am concerned there's us, and there's them. I'm all for debates etc but the minute you involve the other lot, you know it won't be long before they are wanting things going their way and trying to shout us down. Podcasts are a waste of time for the most part, just full of folk too fond of their own voices Given it's being produced for a third-party and properly produced etc for us, it's unlikely that'll happen. If it does, I simply can't see the boss letting it go out. Agree about the podcasts bit tbh, I'm not a massive fan of them in general but I was asked to do it so, I'll do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murzo 7,447 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 @BlueMe and @BridgeIsBlue. @gogzy already has said, if you don’t like it don’t post. Don’t voice your opinions and everything will be alright. It’s that simple. 🙈🙉🙊 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: You're target audience are the cunts who will sit in a house full of rabid fenian bastards and say aye I'm a Rangers fan but only because so and so. Nah not particularly. It's a bit of a really narrow niche there. Kinda hard to specifically target them too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,532 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, BlueMe said: I don't listen to any podcasts tbh, not my thing at all. Never used to be mine. Disgusted that I do now tbh. I'd have accused folk of being technology obsessed millennial cunts a few years back for listening to them. It's like when my gramps worked out CD players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, BridgeIsBlue said: A bawhair away from "muh point scoring", so close. Nah not at all. Just blows my mind how frequently folk insist I speak/write about peados. If you want to talk about it with them then by all means, fill your boots but it'll not be happening on a football podcast I'm doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.