I'd be all for it. The one sticking point is the yearly re-elections. While I think it's a good idea in principle, it also opens the door to those with an agenda pushing through change within the club. It's a hypothetical situation, but all it would take is a percentage of the members to convince a further percentage to follow their lead and we could have mass change and a lack of stability within the club. That could go on every year. I'd be more favourable of a term-elected chairman or 'president' who sets ye overall vision for the club and then we, as members, elect the people to support him, with the chairman given a proxy of 20-30% to allow for the ability to make change. The chairman would obviously have to go through a sort of election campaign where he would make clear his goals for his term and give indications as to how that would be achieved. It's slightly similar to the Barcelona model, but with a few tweaks to make it slightly more workable (IMO of course). Edit: I meant to add, the rest of the board could still have their jobs evaluated annually, in order to ensure maximum efficiency, but the chairman would be able to serve his term (obviously within reason and outwith exceptional circumstances) without too much need to worry about job security. It would give them the freedom to make widespread changes where necessary without fear of a backlash.