Jump to content

Eastcoast Al

New Signing
  • Posts

    232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Eastcoast Al

  1. The Club is Hougang United is the club other club Bill Ng owns. http://www.hgfc.com.sg/ And it has No Surrender scarfs http://www.hgfc.com.sg/fans.html .
  2. Thanks was not a critism of your post. Just found it a strange way to put the message out there, but what do I know because it's working.
  3. Football personalities, board mostly Scottish first I've heard this. But saying the right things anyway. But through twitter?
  4. Yes he will be there to make money, but if he is also there to secure the long term future of our club all the better, the two do not need be incompatable.
  5. No one does it is all speculation until it is announced I'm affraid.
  6. Will Andy Carroll move on finally from the £35 mill price tag he has been burdened with and find some sort of consistency now or will he always struggle over the course of a season whilst at Liverpool? Not that I am suggestIng this goal represents a turning point in his fortunes, more a point for debate. I think he is a good player, but nowhere near that price bracket and the added pressure has taken its toll, he will only be rembered for the transfer.
  7. Also the Creditors meeting on the 20th April will proved further clarity on our situation and D&F's thoughts on moving this forward.
  8. Well done Jelavic good to see thing working out.
  9. Right pointing out that the name change is getting thrown in my face at work is evidence that I'm not a Rangers fan and I'm getting fed up answering this is evidence I don't support Rangers?
  10. Differing option must be a taig/Celtic fan. Fair enough
  11. We the C***** fans at work are make great store that it is, I can only see this getting worse to be honest.
  12. No it does not strike a nerve with me and my name is Al. But what does piss me off is Rangers fans coming out with shite that will enviably be thrown back in my face at work, that I will need to reply to as if it was personally attributed to myself. Glad to clear that up for you.
  13. It has the same company registration number, it was simply a transfer of ownership and a change of company name to reflect the new trading status. It was similar to Rangers shares transferring from SDM to CW pre-administration The NewCo shell company stuff with Leeds could well be similar to what is proposed, but Leeds united were liquidated and recorded at Conpanies House. As for SPL / SFA Registration they seem to be making it up so who knows.
  14. We have some who come out with equally desperate statements like when they changed from a ltd company to a plc in 1984 that Celtic disappeared even though the Company registration number stayed the same and they never entered administration let alone liquidation. This pish could well come back at us if we NewCo in the future.
  15. On over to the Clyde 1 travel report the M8 appears to be gridlocked tonight for some reason.
  16. There is not certain that a CVA will be accepted by Tickerus (if the BK bid fails) or HMRC if we lose the big tax case. I have heard a lot of reassuring words from various parties over the 18 months that the tax case would first be found in our favour (which is still to be seen) and that HMRC would accept a pence in the pound deal with little or no evidence to back them up. It would be naive to believe that they could not force the liquidation of Rangers, and this worst case scenario needs to be factored in to the bids. I am also a little doubious that if a CVA is agreed that we can exit administration before the end of the season given how long it has taken us to get three bids in the table, let alone identify a preferred bidder. I might sound a little cup half empty over this, but I have had my hopes raised too many times only have them dashed to not have become jaded and cynical with this whole sorry state of affairs.
  17. The only way they will be retrospective is if we are liquidated before the are accepted. If we are not liquidated or exit administration through a CVA they will not apply. I think the first club likely to fall fowl of them could well be Hearts with there history of late wages to players. Assuming the changes get approved of course. Having said that, the timing is suspect all the same.
  18. D&F have arranged the meeting on the 20th April for creditors, I like to think that a preferred bid would be identified before then. As for the affects of the proposals on the bids, surely that can only be addressed once it is known which ones have been accepted and which have not.
  19. How have we been punished for the same thing twice? we have been given the ten point penalty for entering administration and nothing else.
  20. It is a council not the HMRC so do not see the relevance to us.
  21. I think that dependant on the proposal in question some as 11-1 and some are 8-4. Where this was derived from or decided on I don't know.
  22. I think you will find the late payment of players is most probably aimed at Hearts to be honest, but I get your point.
  23. UEFA are pushing for financial fair play across all leagues, so after the mess SDM/CW has got us into we are going to be rewarded with entry to the cash cow of English football. We will be in Scotland or it will be an indication that a British League is the long game (assuming the FA offer admittance).
  24. Dunfermilne are going to the first after a year in the spl, therefore how will it effect them next year? The only good thing is that the RFFF paid up so may receive good will from that one.
×
×
  • Create New...