Sweetheart

A Supplies Shop, where travelling fans can stock up on their Scottish favorites square sausage, haggis and the pride etc.

For a short term solution, i agree we need some players with experience, to guide our younger players through the leagues. However the cost of having Miller would pay for a couple experienced players within the SFL.

I agree with you, I also believe it should be 1 club 1 vote, so that the 'whole' of Scottish football has a say, it's unfair that the SPL get to vote on the decisions for the whole of Scottish football, and the SFL have no say. Maybe this will be addressed as priority once there is a single governing body.

If the SFL are now paving the way for reconstruction then 'good' . Longmuir has the qualities you expect to see within a governing body, and I feel he will do what's best for Scottish football.

Excellent response from DL, now we should get some sensible, level headed decisions that will pave the way for Scottish football as a whole to prosper.

agreed. It would be better to introduce the reconstruction in steps rather than all at once, each step being voted on by all clubs.

For the SPL/SFL to approach SFA for external help, will all the clubs in those two bodies get to vote whether they want to take this course of action?

Is this one of the companies that CW transferred into his dad's name ?

Gollum for me

yep, I expect RTV to do a series of documentaries like 'The Rising', there's no reason these can't be adapted into a book or film

Former Rangers owner Craig Whyte has agreed to sell the book and film rights to his story of his takeover and the financial collapse of the club i'll wait for the official club version, as no doubt CW's story will contain fairy tales.

I like the idea, but I would like to see all the away games on live in the UK ON RTV. I believe it's important to expand our media coverage as much as possible.

I like to know that we have a man willing to stand up for the club, if we don't defend our selves then no-one else will. CG still gets my vote.

Reconstruction needs to be thought out sensibly, an SPL 2 is just another sticking plaster. Everything is relying on T.V. money. Should the T.V. companies decide they no longer want to broadcast Scottish football or reduce the amount of broadcasts, then we'll be left in the same position. Clubs need to become self sufficient and reconstruction should be paving the way to help clubs achieve it.

What powers do the SFA have to help a league that's in financial trouble? I can't see an SFL2 being formed unless theirs something in the rules that allows the head governing body to step in.

Aye, all of those and his style of play reminds me of a young Davie Cooper, not Davie Cooper in his heyday. But given time who knows what Temps will be capable of.

I'm not comparing . just stating that Temps reminds me of a young Davie Cooper.

Davie Cooper - Legend Temps reminds me of Davie Cooper in his earlier years of playing football.

I agreed with your post up until this bit; I still believe CG is the man to take us forward, but should do all his media talking through a club spokesperson

Yes he is in an awful position, by voting 'yes' to reconstruction he will be protecting SPL clubs from disaster should the SPL fold for financial reasons, because if it does fold, ALL the clubs will have to apply to the SFL for membership. Any teams that have qualified for europe next season won't be able to play there because they won't have a governing body (they will only be associate members if accepted). The 18 clubs left in the SFL would be left in a position of sink or swim, once Rangers leaves that division. By voting 'no' to the reconstruction he would be securing the future for the 'whole' of Scottish football, and not just a select few. A no vote would allow time to formulate a sensible reconstruction plan, that will benefit all the teams financially and not leave it to Rangers fans to fund the division for another year and then leave them high and dry because we have moved up divisions.

Whyte was never a director of sevco 5088 as he doesn't show on the register of directors at any time. He appears to have applied to be a director but it has not been accepted by companys house, so somewhere in between he got told where to go.

it looks like a person authorised has signed the application for CW as it is underlined at the bottom of the page

I read these documents as; Samuel Lloyd created a shelf company on 29 Mar 2012 sold it to CG on the 03 May 2012 as a vehicle for the CVA CW applied to be a director on 09 may 2012 but there's no reference to him being accepted, so did he get told where to go at that point?

Yes, they could have made it more awkward for us, but that would have been too transparent after all they are suppose to be looking after us as governing body

scenario 12-12-18 gets voted through - SPL declare themselves bankrupt - reform as SPFL or something alike - Rangers whistle for the money owed them?