Rangersfansmediawatch

Don't think he did.. Sutton knew what he was going to say when he came on,DJ just wasn't prepared for what he said. He's had a go a couple of times with the shite he writes in the papers about DJ and you just knew Sutton was going to do what he did. This was a complete set up to humiliate DJ and no air time to callers wanting to respond,So why did they have Sutton on the show when a few days ago McCulloch stated he was trying to get him on and before he came on he said callers would get to ask him questions.

He previously left and came back,I reckon it would suit them if he got up and just left after that. Two of his colleagues just sit there and let him get abused,Don't defend him and only last week that nasally bastard Keevins was asking Sutton if he missed him... Serious agenda tonight and an all time low from this show.

The complete irony of Sutton telling someone they had no integrity. Notice Gerry boy let one person on to speak about it for a few seconds and not one other call about the disgrace that is Sutton. Keevins as well sitting there saying nothing as his colleague was totally insulted and failing to defend DJ. This was an absolute stitch up by McCulloch,More so because he has listened to Rangers fans all week putting the boot into Sutton and choosing him to come on on a day that DJ was on the show. Anyone else going on and repeating what Sutton said would be cut off before they finished. It was the exact same with Dellacunt and McCulloch is just a sober carbon copy of him. I don't think there has ever been a Rangers supporter who has hosted this programme,Let alone a Protestant. Might be interesting finding out what their response to asking them might be and finding out why they haven't Bigot radio at it's finest hosted by one of the biggest Rangers hating bigots of all.. Gerry McCulloch.. The satanic bastard child of Jim " swerving on a street near you soon " Dellahunt

No idea who your'e speaking about,You only have to look at the original IPSO statement on the complaints and the timing of these statements from the club and club1872 to see that these came about after the decision by IPSO. You won't find any official complaints with board members names on them and highly doubt any from those within club1872,Rangers fans done the dirty work and others trying to take the plaudits for playing no part.

Gives you an idea of how steep the hill was.

No doubt Aberdeen's game will be given to big Anne to help out the funding of their new stand.

Another good bit of work from these guys,Absolutely outstanding.

Lets get something cleared up here... It wasn't the club or club1872 who took them to task,It was ordinary Rangers fans who made complaints to IPSO, If they hadn't done so there would be no apology and no retraction.

Is it just me that sees something incredibly stupid in what they claim. " To mark the arrival of Rangers to Pittodrie for the first time,We'd like to commemorate the passing of the club formally known as Rangers " So we died but they still welcome Rangers. Bizarre

Just a quick update further to my original complaint,Wasn't happy with the original response and therefor told them i wished to escalate it higher and received this today,Not much different to their original response.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14754264.Rangers_need_to_cut_a_deal_with_Joey_Barton_to_avoid_messy_litigation__warns_employment_law_specialist__/?ref=mr&lp=2 In an earlier version of this story on the heraldscotland site yesterday it was suggested that Joey Barton, who has been suspended by Rangers Football Club, could take action against the club in a tribunal on grounds of religious discrimination. Rangers has no truck with discrimination on religious or any other grounds and we apologise for the suggestion causing offence to the club and its supporters.

Given you won't be posting in this thread again... Thanks

Here's better logic for you... Stay off the thread if your not interested,The thread is aimed at those who want to do something,Not childish trolls like you who have nothing to add... Nothing constructive to say then you know the rest. Start your own thread about how we shouldn't fight back against the media. Have a nice night.

Perhaps you should take your own advice,Perhaps you should even grow up instead of acting like a 5yr old.

Yea i read them but still confused as to what your saying here,Are you not claiming that Barton could say it was because he was a catholic he was suspended and the proof was Halliday wasn't. ?

Good photographer and all round nice guy,Some of his pics have been crackers.

Why are the cops so intent to catch all those involved in smashing the toilets,Most of the story's today about someone being arrested but the vast majority of the story's are about the toilets. Why haven't the cops even mentioned they are looking for evidence or information of those involved holding up the banners. They don't need to ask for information,The stewards and the cops are the ones who allowed them in,So they are just as guilty. Most people with banners are asked to show what's on them,If the stewards or cops are unsure the banners are normally held up so the cops in the control box can see them on cctv and decide if they will be allowed They also have to have a fire safety certificate, This also isn't the first time huge banners have been allowed into the dome. My guess is the stewards are no more than afraid to knock them back for fear of being abused or worse and more sinister is that these stewards are Celtc's own stewards,So kind of answers the question as to why they get in with them.

Good to see someone else being pro-active,Well done mate.

But i'll repeat... Barton has already stated he was suspended simply because he continued it off the pitch.. That's why Halliday wasn't suspended.

Whats it got to do with you..Are you my dad.

You claimed that you were told reviews of him which were frightening but failed to tell us all what they were. If you're referring to the Rangers v St Mirren under 20's game.. I was there and apart from being a bit rusty he never put a foot wrong in an hour on the pitch,Most people around me were of similar opinion. Am i mentally challenged ? Most normal people with even the lowest of intelligence would have simply said " Did you read what i posted " So perhaps you should be asking yourself the question.

Barton already stated that the reason Halliday wasn't given the same suspension was because Barton continued it off the pitch. Retracting it very very quickly would possibly stop all the absolute morons on social media starting yet more utter nonsense claiming Barton was suspended because he was a catholic,They already are utterly obsessed asking people in the media if he is being paid or not,You don't need to guess why they want to know. It shouldn't have been retracted and no one knows why it has,The piece of the story which has been removed has been removed for a reason.. Braiden was doing no more than crossing a very dangerous line and at a guess he himself has removed it rather than an editor. Both Braiden for including it and the lawyer for even suggesting such a pathetic thing should be taken to task for the repulsive comments,Which were very crass in the extreme and shows what a gutter press we have operating in the Scottish media. I can't really do anything myself unless i had a screengrab of the story before it was changed,Having that allows me to make a complaint and ask for an apology and also gives me reason to make an official complaint to IPSO. Newspaper story's have to go through editors and legal reps before they are allowed in a newspaper online or print versions. Who from the editorial allowed this Why was it passed by their legal rep What was Braiden's real motive for adding it. Why did he remove it It was removed for a reason and the difficult part is finding out why.

Virtuoso... Who's alfie Briggs ? Can someone screengrab what Braiden wrote before he edited it.

Can't see the support being happy a guy signed a couple of months ago and being given a million pound pay off after 5 games. You simply keep him here,train with the youths,Don't put him in the first team squad,Now and then put him on the bench and bring him on with a minute to go. The club isn't in any position to throw around a million quid or more and Barton should be leaving on our terms not his.