-
Posts
104 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Everything posted by Four Founding Fathers
-
Stevie G can sure spot a diamond in the rough. One of the many attributes that make a top manager.
-
Possible end to the strip saga?
Four Founding Fathers replied to Drunk and disorderly.'s topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Most of them happen to be bheggars -
Say DM would get 20k a week on top of the 1 mill comp. I think we should forget DM and put the comp on top of the wages of a new manager. I think we wouldnt get bad one for 40k a week. If he is a success domestically and in Europe the extra mil for 2nd and the 3rd years, he would earn himself. He's proved his ineptitude against a caretaking coach from the youth. No offence to Murty but if he isnt our level then DM can't be neither. I was all for him before Pedro but think we should be aiming higher than we are. We learned the hard way with Pedro.
-
Everytime you press bomber pops up and kicks him square in the baws. I'd invest in that.
-
Union bears display
Four Founding Fathers replied to LaudrupsPatrickBoots's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Ohh the fucking stench -
I seen what King was doing from the start. he signed an unknown manager to buy time. If he got someone that was known. We would be able to make our mind up straight away. With Pedro, we have no choice but to wait and see what happens, fortunately for King, most people wont be able to see how capable he is until next season, after season ticket money has been received. He has shown already that he is incapable of tactical thinking and remedying obvious faults in the team. To me Murty was doing better. I have said from the start if we took McInnes from the sheep it would weaken them strengthen us, as he is competing better with a third of our resources and also hes a real Rangers man so knows what playing for us means. I can't go another season like this having those taig bastards lording it over us.
-
Pedro - not getting good vibes
Four Founding Fathers replied to MacBoyd's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Pedro is in a unique situation he can come in and test the squad and formations in competitive games. Soon he'll find the dead wood and remove it bring in his own guys and then he will be able to implement his own tactics. We should stand by him until its his own squad and only then should we judge him as a manager. We should also put pressure on King and the 3 bears to start this over investment thats badly needed. It would be better to have the "Fans group " doing it too as shareholders they would have a louder voice. -
Hyndman Player of the month
Four Founding Fathers replied to RFCRobertson's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Great player would love to keep him here permanently. Although an extension on his current loan would do fine. -
Re: Res 11 Failure Not McCoist's Fault
Four Founding Fathers replied to Smile's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Its a sad thing to see Ally act the way he has. it would be less harsh if he needed the money but he obviously doesn't. At a time when working class bears were skinning themselves to contribute to Rangers. Ally was taking penny shares from Green to support him and a big salary for sitting home. He knew he wasn't good enough but refused to walk without being paid his contract, even when King came in and every penny was needed to rebuild. Its clear he could have used a proxy to vote but again cash wins with Ally and he abstained from voting to scupper the dilution of his shares. Though the leaking was wrong and motives questionable. It maybe show the feeling the board had with Ally about his conduct during the salary situation. Does he realise the way his behaviour makes him look, does he care? -
Re: Res 11 Failure Not McCoist's Fault
Four Founding Fathers replied to Smile's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Walter was doing the punditry for Sky when asked and Ally was being paid by Ladbrokes to launch a new football show. I hope something changes though. -
I know though if another company paid for the adverts at Newcastle they would have alot more revenue. Ashley won't lose a penny in his dealings with Newcastle. If he sells them he will get an increase on his 135m investment never mind all the practically free advertising. Ask any Newcastle fan on Ashleys stewardship and you'll see why he shouldn't be allowed near a Club like ours.
-
Why Garners Yellow was 101% right
Four Founding Fathers replied to RFCRobertson's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
The ball bobbled. I am shocked at the standard of referee in Scotland to miss that surely we should have had a... penalty. -
What I am saying is , that Newcastle would be at the top of the EPL if MA had invested in 2007, They were always in the top 5 for revenue until MA and SD's onerous contracts depleted revenue by selling SD advertising and naming rights for buttons very much like the deals he has with us at the moment and he hasn't invested anything other than his initial shares which CG gave him for a song. I wish Ashley would build us up. I wish King would first but neither seem likely. I think if those 2 were out the picture there would be more investors interested in us.
-
During the late 90's and into the 2000's Newcastle were within the top 5 of English clubs in terms of revenue. They were mismanaged by Hall but absolutely raped by Ashley they have become an expensive billboard for Sportsdirect. The revenue they have lost through onerous contracts that SD has with Newcastle, similar to our own, has cost Newcastle a place at the top of the EPL. Edit - Aswell as MIke Ashleys lack of investment seen in Newcastle's peers.
-
Bullshit story, he can't buy more than 10% atm. For anybody saying Ashley is better than King look at Newcastle they should be top 4 club in England with the revenue they get but Ashley has then bobbing in and out of the Championship. Where is all their cash going? What we have in common with Newcastle is a loyal fanbase even when their facing relegation their fans still come and watch and buy merchandise. That's exactly what the FAT ASSET STRIPPER in keen on. I am no fan of King but Big Fat Mike is a no go for me, we have suffered enough.
-
who do you want for Manager out of the names mentioned
Four Founding Fathers replied to Smile's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Derek McInnes but only if FDB is a definite no. He could strengthen us while weakening the sheep, -
-
-
To think if Warburton was still here Hyndman would have been hooked at 60mins.
-
Who gets what from a replica shirt sale
Four Founding Fathers replied to zanderbear's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Oh true. So if we have a deal with Puma and sponsorship with 32Red what revenue are we losing to Fat Mike? -
Who gets what from a replica shirt sale
Four Founding Fathers replied to zanderbear's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Most clubs get a fee at the beginning of the deal a guaranteed amount before that 6% Edit- The club who are closest in comparison is the Taigs and they got £30m over 5 years before that 6%. -
How do emergency loan deals work?
Four Founding Fathers replied to j1mgg's topic in General Football & Sport
Shows how bad Hivs are, begging off the Bheggers. With any luck, he'll cost them the league. It would make up, a bit, for this shitty season if Hivs don't get promoted and the wee ginger bigot gets the boot. -
Any Info on State Aid
Four Founding Fathers replied to Four Founding Fathers's topic in General Football & Sport
Before RM, I wasnt aware of FTH so got my news about it spoonfed from bheggar rags like the daily rhabbid. I was aware of the "accusations", as they portrayed it but facts were thin on the ground. It was only yesterday I saw some FOI requests about it that it showed the scale of it and how blatantly obvious it is. -
Any Info on State Aid
Four Founding Fathers replied to Four Founding Fathers's topic in General Football & Sport
That is the point in the post. I have missed a lot and in a glance over of It on Football tax haven makes it looks like a work has went into it and it is a lot of info to digest. So I was hoping for some helpful bears to summarise it in an articulate and concise manner.