Jump to content


New Signing
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Zoso1872

  • Rank
    New Signing

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Just because you can't follow the logic doesnt make it fucked up. It means you're thick. Of the front three that started Roofe was the form player going into the game. Of the front three that started only Roofe picked up an injury but according to you we can't take that into account when describing his performance as 'abysmal' You also said he was the most anonymous of the front three, yet was the only forward to win any headers all game, one setting up morelos apart from a last ditch tackle. Won three fouls for the team (just 1 less than morelos) as well as 1 clearance, was involved
  2. Roofe on fire vs roofe not on fire still does not equal abysmal Try to keep up 👍
  3. Well done son, took you a while but you got there in the end 👍
  4. Nobody's triggered just calling it as I see it
  5. Fuck up ya arrogant wank, I'm taking into account that one of our top performing players picking up an injury may have have had impact on his performance, hardly a revelation. You have no idea whether roofe was going to be subbed at half time, Gerrard said that he already knew he wanted Hagi on and the injury made the decision for him. Nothing to suggest it was because he thought his performance was 'abysmal'
  6. None of the outfield 10 got pass marks but thats different to calling someone abysmal, knowing that at some point in the half he picked up an injury
  7. Let's be clear I said he was decent for the limited service we provided him, in that when we did get the ball to him he tried to do something with it, didn't give the ball away much and nearly put morelos through 1 on 1. When he didn't have the ball he was still putting himself about. So he had about the same impact as morelos and did a damn sight more than kent who contributed the square root of fuck all in the first half. We then find out after the game he was injured and played a part in him coming off. Of course performances could have (and should have) been better in the first half i
  8. I'm not making excuses for him I thought he was decent for the limited service we gave the front three. The header he won nearly put Alfie through but for a last ditch tackle, there was one where he had a poor touch and let Ajer step away with the ball but overall the few times we managed to keep the ball long enough he was linking the play well. Its generally accepted that old firms are different to every other game and players need to adapt, some will from the first whistle and some need to play there way in to it, so to say that it's excuse making for roofe is just pish I've said
  9. Thats more than a bit harsh mate. With it being his first old firm he was unlikely to hit the ground running from the first whistle. Still, I felt he was getting involved and trying to link the midfield and attack but the midfield couldn't keep the ball long enough to give any of the front three decent service. Add in that he's picked up a knock at some point in the half too. Aribo on the other hand was abysmal. Not his first old firm either and was really looking for him to step up and be counted yesterday, but wasn't close to being good enough
  10. What a fucking result! As Walter said pre match there are various challenges you need to meet throughout the season, this was our biggest so far, and regardless of how it was achieved we've met that challenge! We Are The People 🔴⚪🔵
  11. Thought he had a good game today, good hold up play and created a few chances for us and would have scored but for a great stop from their keeper. Think that is his third start and he's scored twice, one was even good enough for goal of the month. He's also been singled out by the gaffer for his performance today, was his motm. Yet according to some on here he's shite and just not looked good enough!?
  • Create New...