NorthUistBear 86 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Seems to be a mixture in opinions in regards to boyd. it would be interesting to see what percentage actually wants him and who doesn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxwellrfc 6 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 i voted no but im not botherd either way tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthUistBear 86 Posted August 20, 2009 Author Share Posted August 20, 2009 i voted no but im not botherd either way tbh lol just added that option afterwards. lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
super hans 55 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 I'd get him on a new contract so we're not forced into accepting a penny-pinching offer or, even worse, he goes for nowt. If an offer of £3m of over came in, I'd let him go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,446 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 YES! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorfolkRanger 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Yes keep him as we would have no one to replace him! A fit and on-form Kris Boyd guarantees you at least 25+ goals a season. And i cant see the likes of Miller, Lafferty or Novo doing that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Not bothered. With a change of system, I think we can win the league without him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Yes keep him as we would have no one to replace him! A fit and on-form Kris Boyd guarantees you at least 25+ goals a season. And i cant see the likes of Miller, Lafferty or Novo doing that! But with a 4-3-3, you could maybe see the three 'attackers' getting 10, 11 or 12 goals each going by what we've seen of it so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorfolkRanger 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Yes keep him as we would have no one to replace him! A fit and on-form Kris Boyd guarantees you at least 25+ goals a season. And i cant see the likes of Miller, Lafferty or Novo doing that! But with a 4-3-3, you could maybe see the three 'attackers' getting 10, 11 or 12 goals each going by what we've seen of it so far. However on Saturday we played 4-4-2 and thats the system i believe Walter will mainly use in the SPL. The 4-3-3 is going to be our European system. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ribz2009 12 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. I know Miller has started the season with a bang, but those who think he will score 20+ this seasom need their heads checked...he brings so much to the team but he will not score enough goals for us to win the league and with that we end up having to rely on others. Lafferty wont score enough, Naismith wont score enough and we dont exactly have a 'Scoring' midfield with Davis, Mendes and Thomson. So where will the goals come from? what if miller get injured? I think its ridiculous that this is brought up every season, he may not be the best player in the world, heh he might not even be the best player in the spl or even our squad. But he brings goals which in turn help get points. And im affriad its only points that can win us the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthUistBear 86 Posted August 20, 2009 Author Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. I know Miller has started the season with a bang, but those who think he will score 20+ this seasom need their heads checked...he brings so much to the team but he will not score enough goals for us to win the league and with that we end up having to rely on others. Lafferty wont score enough, Naismith wont score enough and we dont exactly have a 'Scoring' midfield with Davis, Mendes and Thomson. So where will the goals come from? what if miller get injured? I think its ridiculous that this is brought up every season, he may not be the best player in the world, heh he might not even be the best player in the spl or even our squad. But he brings goals which in turn help get points. And im affriad its only points that can win us the league. i agree. i only brought it up because i wanted to see exactly the split between the fans. but its simple, WE NEED HIM!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duffy86 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 keep him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthUistBear 86 Posted August 20, 2009 Author Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Rangers 2-1 St Mirren Boyd(1) Rangers 1-1 St Mirren Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 19 points dropped! lol 3rd place without boyd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,813 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 17 points dropped! lol Who's to say that the striker replacing Boyd in those games wouldn't have scored the goals? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmico1986 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 17 points dropped! lol you cant really use that data tho because who is to say that which ever player filled boyds boots on that day wouldn't have made an even better contribution to the scoreline I think we are a much better team without boyd playing. You can see the difference every time he comes off the park as a sub and is replaced. Look at saturday for example.Yeh we were winning 3-1 when he was taken off but the forward line link so much better when boyd was removed from the equation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthUistBear 86 Posted August 20, 2009 Author Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 17 points dropped! lol Who's to say that the striker replacing Boyd in those games wouldn't have scored the goals? lol it was a joke. lol i know he would have. i edited previous also, missed 1 game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthUistBear 86 Posted August 20, 2009 Author Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 17 points dropped! lol you cant really use that data tho because who is to say that which ever player filled boyds boots on that day wouldn't have made an even better contribution to the scoreline I think we are a much better team without boyd playing. You can see the difference every time he comes off the park as a sub and is replaced. Look at saturday for example.Yeh we were winning 3-1 when he was taken off but the forward line link so much better when boyd was removed from the equation. lol i know pal, it was a joke. hense the Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theweebluenose 4,335 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyd we would not have won last Season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmico1986 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 17 points dropped! lol you cant really use that data tho because who is to say that which ever player filled boyds boots on that day wouldn't have made an even better contribution to the scoreline I think we are a much better team without boyd playing. You can see the difference every time he comes off the park as a sub and is replaced. Look at saturday for example.Yeh we were winning 3-1 when he was taken off but the forward line link so much better when boyd was removed from the equation. lol i know pal, it was a joke. hense the lol i know it was a joke hence the Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthUistBear 86 Posted August 20, 2009 Author Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 17 points dropped! lol you cant really use that data tho because who is to say that which ever player filled boyds boots on that day wouldn't have made an even better contribution to the scoreline I think we are a much better team without boyd playing. You can see the difference every time he comes off the park as a sub and is replaced. Look at saturday for example.Yeh we were winning 3-1 when he was taken off but the forward line link so much better when boyd was removed from the equation. lol i know pal, it was a joke. hense the lol i know it was a joke hence the lol i know mate. boyd is an inigma. always will be while at rangers but you cannot write him off. his goals are so vitaly important. a replacement would probably not have scored 30 last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marinho1982 0 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Without his goals, we would not be champions , keep boydy!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 im saying yes and always would as boyds ma favourite player. just my opinion. think for someone who has been top of the goal list in the last 3 season and gets 31 last season yet people would accept 3 million for him .. if he got 10 to 15 goals down the EPL a team would get laughed at if they offerd 3 million for him. am sure anelka and ronaldo had 15 going into the last game down there, and thats not a good ratio for strikers of there quality specialy when ronaldo had high end of 30 season before P.s just my opinion member haha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Pepper 117 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Boyd is a gaurenteed 25+ goals a season he's a must stay IMO, Goals win matches Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ribz2009 12 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Without Boyds goals last season we wouldnt have won the league. Lets not hide that fact, we all know it. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in Ofcourse, im not saying this..it was a great team effort last season but we cant hide the fact his goals have been very vital. Without bougerra we wouldnt have won the league imo, without davis we wouldnt have imo and without boyd we wouldnt have. It may be a team game but everyone has their invididual perks, and boyds goals last season stacked up a good amount of points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts