stooarts 4 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 McCulloch in for Thomson, fuck sake what does Smith see in this useless piece of shite !!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 110,101 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 thomson is injured mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stooarts 4 Posted December 15, 2009 Author Share Posted December 15, 2009 thomson is injured mate I know that, but why McCulloch ? Iwould rather have Fleck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Is Mcculloch can play as a defensive midfielder too obvious an answer...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigalan1964 0 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 McCulloch in for Thomson, fuck sake what does Smith see in this useless piece of shite !!!! he better fuckin produce he is due us a peformance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers2484 0 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 WOULD RATHER HAVE NESS OR FLECK Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Is Mcculloch can play as a defensive midfielder too obvious an answer...... Yes as its very debatable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Is Mcculloch can play as a defensive midfielder too obvious an answer...... Yes as its very debatable. On you go then...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRangers 2 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Who else we gonny fuckin play there ? fuck man some people on here should think before they talk alot of shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Is Mcculloch can play as a defensive midfielder too obvious an answer...... Yes as its very debatable. On you go then...... He's rubbish in the midfield, lacking all basic skills to be a midfielder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Is Mcculloch can play as a defensive midfielder too obvious an answer...... Yes as its very debatable. On you go then...... He's rubbish in the midfield, lacking all basic skills to be a midfielder. The quality of debate you are well know for....ta boab..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unit123 14 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 As much as it pains me to say, it is the correct decision with Thomson being unfit from the squad we have taken. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbm26896 995 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 we could have played Wilson at CB and pushed Bougherra into midfield - but WS prefers to play Lee - lets hope he repays the faith shown in him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IfYeCannae 48 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 McCulloch has no awareness to be a competent midfielder, he is constantly found wanting when going in for tackles, his passing is woeful and is constantly on his arse scratching his head looking for a foul any-time he challenges in the air. It's the Watty way... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbm26896 995 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 I am getting fucking fed up hearing "We should play Bougherra in midfield" or "We should play Bougherra at right back". He is our best player, but he is a centreback. Play our strongest player in his best position. Fucking hell. just ignore peoples opinions then - its not that difficult life is to short to get stressed sometimes we use people outside their best positions to get a result Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unit123 14 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 I am getting fucking fed up hearing "We should play Bougherra in midfield" or "We should play Bougherra at right back". He is our best player, but he is a centreback. Play our strongest player in his best position. Fucking hell. This Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 I am getting fucking fed up hearing "We should play Bougherra in midfield" or "We should play Bougherra at right back". He is our best player, but he is a centreback. Play our strongest player in his best position. Fucking hell. Especially as it normally cvomes from the same peoiple who have a go at smith for playing people out of position..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johngers Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 McCulloch has no awareness to be a competent midfielder, he is constantly found wanting when going in for tackles, his passing is woeful and is constantly on his arse scratching his head looking for a foul any-time he challenges in the air. It's the Watty way... Who else are you gonna put in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unit123 14 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Maybe Whittaker can do a Ricksen and become a good CM instead of a bombscare RB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 In theory McCulloch is out of position considering most of his career was spent as a striker or a left midfielder. But he's just shite in any position he plays! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuartmccallsfall 4 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 MCullouch has been simply shite tonight. Hes given the ball away more often than not. Had a couple of shots off target, gave away a few fouls and even sttod with his back to the ball (sore ankle or not) while the ball hit off the back of his foot. hes pretty average, pretty amatuer player for Rangers tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulRFC1 115 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 MCullouch has been simply shite tonight. Hes given the ball away more often than not. Had a couple of shots off target, gave away a few fouls and even sttod with his back to the ball (sore ankle or not) while the ball hit off the back of his foot. hes pretty average, pretty amatuer player for Rangers tbh. What game are u watching ? he has broke up play very well , picked the right pass , won most 50/50s and has been an attacking threat. He is doing his job this match lets see if he can keep it up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 Is Mcculloch can play as a defensive midfielder too obvious an answer...... How do you come to this opinion? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangeclement 578 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 TBF he has played fairly well tonight , some dodgy positioning with his man getting away from him but other than that played well 6/10 for me in fact pushing a 7 and i aint his biggest fan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangeclement 578 Posted December 15, 2009 Share Posted December 15, 2009 MCullouch has been simply shite tonight. Hes given the ball away more often than not. Had a couple of shots off target, gave away a few fouls and even sttod with his back to the ball (sore ankle or not) while the ball hit off the back of his foot. hes pretty average, pretty amatuer player for Rangers tbh. come on now , i aint his biggest fan but he has had a solid game tonight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts