dummiesoot 16,181 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Watched again and again, Greegs is a mile slow but fortune does knock his hand away - if that type of contact was up the other end you'd be looking for a penalty - soft yes, and greegs was shit but a foul none the less. Laffert ? joke should have been off the park and we would not have missed him! On another note, how many times did Fortune get away with leaping up with both hands, yet Boyd got climbed all over regularly and ahd fouls given against him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,448 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 was a goal, we were lucky 2 get away with that 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
moorsum 0 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 I actually thought it was a goal tbh, glad it wasn't though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beenie 42 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 was a goal, we were lucky 2 get away with that 1 seen them given. we were lucky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,181 Posted January 3, 2010 Author Share Posted January 3, 2010 was a goal, we were lucky 2 get away with that 1 more lucky to get away with Lafferty and his tackle imo. There is no doubt goalies are over protected but as I said if similar contact is made up the other end on a forward you are looking for a pen! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
moorsum 0 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 And lafferty was pathetic today, F****** terrible Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Tbh it was a perfectly good goal... but that makes it even sweeter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArturBorucRangersLegend 1 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 IMHO, was never a goal. Fortune took Greegs' arms away. And Lafferty was pish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafloppyone 0 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/s...rem/8436131.stm "However, referee Steve Conroy ruled that the striker had led with the arm as he challenged McGregor to a miss-hit McGeady volley that flew high into the air. Conroy appeared to have got that call right despite the resulting anger from the home support, but he was too lenient 11 minutes later when only producing a yellow card after Lafferty lunged dangerously, studs-first into Hinkel's shin. " Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Williamson. 85,416 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 To any tims snooping about this page atm. It should have been a goal but it wasn't, so it get it right up ya's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_ni 12 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 i actually dont think it was a goal. We all know goalkeepers are too well protected but thats the rules and by the rules of the game fortune fouled mcgregor. Soft yes but if he hadnt fouled him mcgregor would have caught the ball. Boruc got a free kick for next to nothing at the other end. keepers are too well protected but thats life. Winding that lot up something shocking though, its great. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ross1873 1 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Think it was a goal myself but as you say lafferty's tackle was abysmal and he was pish to be fair although did win won great corner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancedeangers1 287 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 was a goal, we were lucky 2 get away with that 1 I strongly disagree. M'Gregor should have done much better but Fortune's arm crossed over the keepers and was a clear foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,761 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Watched again and again, Greegs is a mile slow but fortune does knock his hand away - if that type of contact was up the other end you'd be looking for a penalty - soft yes, and greegs was shit but a foul none the less. Laffert ? joke should have been off the park and we would not have missed him! On another note, how many times did Fortune get away with leaping up with both hands, yet Boyd got climbed all over regularly and ahd fouls given against him? This was driving me mad. The referee gave us fuck all today. That was never a goal McGregor should have done better but he was fouled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancedeangers1 287 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 i actually dont think it was a goal. We all know goalkeepers are too well protected but thats the rules and by the rules of the game fortune fouled mcgregor. Soft yes but if he hadnt fouled him mcgregor would have caught the ball. Boruc got a free kick for next to nothing at the other end. keepers are too well protected but thats life. Winding that lot up something shocking though, its great. Spot on assessment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hammer 11 2,712 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Millers appeal gets rejected novo gets injured what we witnessed was karma with that goal and laffertys tackle .GIRFUY you f***** cunts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander2006 50 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 was a goal, we were lucky 2 get away with that 1 I feel it should not have been a free kick which led to the goal. I was raging when it was given so I am quite glad the goal was chopped off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 i actually dont think it was a goal. We all know goalkeepers are too well protected but thats the rules and by the rules of the game fortune fouled mcgregor. Soft yes but if he hadnt fouled him mcgregor would have caught the ball. Boruc got a free kick for next to nothing at the other end. keepers are too well protected but thats life. Winding that lot up something shocking though, its great. I agree. I instantly thought of Sol Campbell's "goal" in France '98. I think it was against Argentina. No goal. Clear foul. As for Lafferty, it did look bad in the replay, but he was going for the ball and did try to pull out of the challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnson 27 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 I thought the goal was disallowed for offside. When the first cross came in, Fortune was miles off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronniemca 479 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 definite goal shagger needed to be stronger and maybe even punch the ball Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Watched again and again, Greegs is a mile slow but fortune does knock his hand away - if that type of contact was up the other end you'd be looking for a penalty - soft yes, and greegs was shit but a foul none the less. Laffert ? joke should have been off the park and we would not have missed him! On another note, how many times did Fortune get away with leaping up with both hands, yet Boyd got climbed all over regularly and ahd fouls given against him? This was driving me mad. The referee gave us fuck all today. That was never a goal McGregor should have done better but he was fouled. I agree with almost all of that, but Lafferty didn't deserve red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancedeangers1 287 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Have no arguments about Lafferty. Whether he meant to catch him the way he did I don't know but have to say he was lucky not to get sent off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,761 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Watched again and again, Greegs is a mile slow but fortune does knock his hand away - if that type of contact was up the other end you'd be looking for a penalty - soft yes, and greegs was shit but a foul none the less. Laffert ? joke should have been off the park and we would not have missed him! On another note, how many times did Fortune get away with leaping up with both hands, yet Boyd got climbed all over regularly and ahd fouls given against him? This was driving me mad. The referee gave us fuck all today. That was never a goal McGregor should have done better but he was fouled. I agree with almost all of that, but Lafferty didn't deserve red. It was a pretty horrible tackle, maybe not a red but not far off it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadaready 9,437 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 It almost looked like McGregor stayed low on purpose to get the foul.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruddie 1 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 From what I have managed to see; 1. Fortune's right arm clearly knocks McGregor's left out of the way and prohibits the keeper from catching the ball. Clear foul. Keeper's are far too protected, but it was a foul as far as the rules go. 2. McDonald would have little to moan about if his goal was chopped off for offside. Very close. 3. Never saw Lafferty's tackle, but I hope to fuck he meant it. He should have saved it for that retard Robson however. 4. Big Jock Knew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts