bluenose4life 5 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I just received this in an email from the PCC... thought i'd post it here as the original post was on here too in BD Commission’s decision in the case ofVarious v Daily MirrorThe Commission received ten complaints that the use of the term “h**” in the article discriminated variously against Rangers fans, Protestants and Roman Catholics.The Commission understood that the term “h**” was deemed highly offensive by the complainants, and that its use in the press caused upset to readers, especially to Rangers fans who felt personally discriminated against by the term. It noted the complainants’ argument that the term was considered sectarian by a number of bodies, such as various police forces, and that its use was viewed as widely unacceptable in Scotland. Nonetheless, while the terms of Clause 12 (Discrimination) stipulate that the press must avoid pejorative reference to an individual’s religion, the clause does not cover generalised remarks about groups of people. In this instance, given that the complainants considered that the use of the term “h**” had discriminated against groups of people in general – be it Protestants, Roman Catholics or Rangers fans – the Commission could not establish a breach of Clause 12 (Discrimination) of the Editors’ Code of Practice.The Commission acknowledged the grounds on which “h**” had caused offence to the complainants; however, it made clear that the terms of the Editors’ Code of Practice do not address issues of taste and offence. The Code is designed to balance the competing rights of freedom of expression, on the one hand, and the rights of individuals on the other. Newspapers and magazines have editorial freedom to publish what they consider to be appropriate provided that the rights of individuals – enshrined in the terms of the Code which specifically protects the individual – are not compromised. To come to a judgement as to whether material is tasteless or offensive would amount to the PCC acting as a moral arbiter, which can lead to censorship. For these reasons, the Commission could not consider this aspect of the complaint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuartmccallsfall 4 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 its strange to me how the use of the word 'censorship' has two detremental effects on what we stand for as rangers fans. On one hand we have sky using censorship to protect the fans of celtic fc from offending and on the other we have the pcc stating that is is a freedom of Speech to use the word 'h***' to descibe a Wide and truly Multicultural body of people who support rangers both within the walls of Ibrox and beyond the shores of this country. What sky and The pcc have done is flipped a Double headed coin, we therefore as rangers fans lose lose. This is a little worrying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 how was this offensive to catholics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClintonGrey 365 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So we can call them Taigs and/or Timmy in public then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BelfastExile1873 8 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So fenians is acceptable as it is not referring to individuals Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2102 556 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So we can call them Taigs and/or Timmy in public then?looks like it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lgr1991 303 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So i can right an article calling celtic fans dirty fenian, tattie picking smelly bastards and face no legal consequences? I wonder if any newspaper would ever even consider describing celtic fans as any of the above, or tim, or whatever else. One rule for them, another for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuartmccallsfall 4 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 how was this offensive to catholics.Because, believe it or not some Catholics support Rangers. I think there's a couple of guys in this forum who do. So, what this means is that the term 'H**s' represents the broad spectrum of Rangers fans. We know who this offends and they know who this offends.Once again let me try and explain;When sang the famine song to them, they knew who were singing it too, but once again this term 'censorship' raises it's ugly head. The only way that anything in the press or on TV has been censored is to protect the lefty, fenien, leftin Scotland. This is why I cant understand why a Catholic can support Rangers because for me the contradiction between religion and politics is to far for it to be viable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeney 241 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So we can sing The Billy Boys again then? Jolly good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeRFCMike 10 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 wats with the avatar sweeney FTP Fenian Bastard!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeney 241 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 i stay in coatbridge so all my pals are tims. It offended a 15 year old but so i changed it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Your new one is pretty gay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeney 241 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Your new one is pretty gay.and your burds a stinker but im not complaining about that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 and your burds a stinker but im not complaining about thatWell, that's true. No one would listen to the opinion of a gayer anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmytto 220 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 This would be a whole different story should "fenian" have been published. However, we move on, the writer is most likely an idiot anyway.WATP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,082 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Dirty Fenian,Taig T*rrier bastard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloudstrife3139 0 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 What they are saying is its ok to say your a fenian, but not an fenian b***ard.So you can calla black person by the N term, and its not offensive. :S Which makes no sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So we can call them Taigs and/or Timmy in public then?Dont you already? What are you scared of? Ive been using those terms for years, in public, amongst friends, talking to people. I laugh at the ones who find them offensive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MURDOCH 1 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Because, believe it or not some Catholics support Rangers. I think there's a couple of guys in this forum who do. So, what this means is that the term 'H**s' represents the broad spectrum of Rangers fans. We know who this offends and they know who this offends.Once again let me try and explain;When sang the famine song to them, they knew who were singing it too, but once again this term 'censorship' raises it's ugly head. The only way that anything in the press or on TV has been censored is to protect the lefty, fenien, leftin Scotland. This is why I cant understand why a Catholic can support Rangers because for me the contradiction between religion and politics is to far for it to be viable.My mates catholic and supports rangers, but oddly sing's the non pc version of follow,follow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
frommetoyou 60 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 My mates catholic and supports rangers, but oddly sing's the non pc version of follow,follow.Please enlighten me I;I'm an old fart, been abroad for over 40years and I only know one version of follow follow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McInnes87 18 Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Please enlighten me I;I'm an old fart, been abroad for over 40years and I only know one version of follow follow.Up the falls! Derrys Walls! We will follow on.Another statement that clears absolutely nothing up.So if someone calls me directly a h**, that is offensive/sectarian? BUT if the same person calls a group of Rangers fans collectively h*** then it is not? I'm not even going to try and work out the logic, it's far too early in the day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
frommetoyou 60 Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Up the falls! Derrys Walls! We will follow on.Another statement that clears absolutely nothing up.So if someone calls me directly a h**, that is offensive/sectarian? BUT if the same person calls a group of Rangers fans collectively h*** then it is not? I'm not even going to try and work out the logic, it's far too early in the day.Thanks bro. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 That the same shite they sent me in an email earlier after I'd complained about the article. Ten complaints aren't going to sway their thinking unfortunately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangershistory 0 Posted October 17, 2010 Share Posted October 17, 2010 Because, believe it or not some Catholics support Rangers. I think there's a couple of guys in this forum who do. So, what this means is that the term 'H**s' represents the broad spectrum of Rangers fans. We know who this offends and they know who this offends.Once again let me try and explain;When sang the famine song to them, they knew who were singing it too, but once again this term 'censorship' raises it's ugly head. The only way that anything in the press or on TV has been censored is to protect the lefty, fenien, leftin Scotland. This is why I cant understand why a Catholic can support Rangers because for me the contradiction between religion and politics is to far for it to be viable.So what your saying is that every catholic in this country has Irish blood...Funny that cause the biggest opponents to the Irish migration was the Indigenous Catholic population of Scotland. They believed there relegion was being diluted by Irish politics and wanted to distance themselves from Irish nationalisium. Indeed it should be remembered that there would have been many catholic Rangers fans in the clubs early years. They had no reson not to follow Rangers after all Rangers were formed as a football club and nothing more. As far as i'm concerned I welcome people of all faiths to follow Rangers the more the better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 17, 2010 Share Posted October 17, 2010 They have just published a defence case for anyone who refers to Celtc as fenians.Thanks very much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts