Updated McCulloch Stats

HG5 · January 8, 2012

Yup, but I'm ok with dishing out a bit of praise where it's due & that 45 mins stood out because he (largely) did the job which we are told he does in an acceptable fashion.

I think one of his main problems, apart from rarely getting anything like close to his opposite number, is one of balance - look at the number of times his upper body goes one way while his feet go the other - means he's rarely strong over the ball and open to being huckled off it.

These are inherent flaws which are not going to get better at his age, so will always be weaknesses. We can't rely on it dropping right for him once every couple of years!

As am i.
The stats dont lie here, it is so obviosu to anyone who knows anything about the game, Lee is a hindrance. If Ally cannot see that then we are in trouble.

SirWalterSmithLegend · January 8, 2012

Yup, but I'm ok with dishing out a bit of praise where it's due & that 45 mins stood out because he (largely) did the job which we are told he does in an acceptable fashion.
I think one of his main problems, apart from rarely getting anything like close to his opposite number, is one of balance - look at the number of times his upper body goes one way while his feet go the other - means he's rarely strong over the ball and open to being huckled off it.
These are inherent flaws which are not going to get better at his age, so will always be weaknesses. We can't rely on it dropping right for him once every couple of years!

(tu)

demise · January 8, 2012

He injured Kayal though

Useful for once this season! I wonder how many points ahead we wouldve been this season i he wasnt given even a single chance to play. McCoist

demise · January 8, 2012

To be honest, with all that injury problems, i wont be surprised to see him playing as a striker sometime soon.

Mor3los_1 · January 8, 2012

To be honest, with all that injury problems, i wont be surprised to see him playing as a striker sometime soon.

Well we all wanted that a few years back when he had virtually no fit strikers or is that selective memories again?

TheLawMan · January 8, 2012

Are we going to get a new Lee McCulloch stats thread after every poor result that he's involved in as well as every win he's not involved in?

McCulloch has started 12 games

W = 4

D = 2

L = 6

A win % of 33%

A loss % of 50%

Games he hasnt started

W = 13

D = 3

L = 0

A win % of 81.25%

A loss % of 0%

:craphead:

Marky_RFC · January 8, 2012

That is a pretty damning stat, if it's right. Just feel he slows us down too much when he plays! And he has almost no mobility! Not gonna chastise the guy like some so called fans but he really shouldn't be getting ahead of edu, Davis, ness, Hutton, fleck or even Ortiz

demise · January 8, 2012

Well we all wanted that a few years back when he had virtually no fit strikers or is that selective memories again?

I never wanted to see him in a Rangers jersey in a first place. And as far as i remember, he scored 3 or 4 goals in the SPL in his first season. And he was regular!

SirWalterSmithLegend · January 8, 2012

:lol: TWM :praise:

:mutley:

TravelingWilBEARy · January 8, 2012

Some people have waaay too much time on their hands. This thread is horrific.

TheLawMan · January 15, 2012

Are we going to get a new Lee McCulloch stats thread after every poor result that he's involved in as well as every win he's not involved in?

McCulloch has started 12 games

W = 4

D = 2

L = 6

A win % of 33%

A loss % of 50%

Games he hasnt started

W = 14

D = 3

L = 0

A win % of 82.5%

A loss % of 0%

:craphead:

SirWalterSmithLegend · January 15, 2012

Chef · January 15, 2012

People using stats thinking if they are bad enough he merits his abuse.

Those games we lost with mculloch as many are happy to portray, was he playing alone v 11.

TheLawMan · January 15, 2012

People using stats thinking if they are bad enough he merits his abuse.
Those games we lost with mculloch as many are happy to portray, was he playing alone v 11.

No. But the other ten were playing with a man short. (tu)

Chef · January 15, 2012

No. But the other ten were playing with a man short.

Point proven

TheLawMan · January 15, 2012

Point proven

That's the purpose of the stats. (tu)

TheLawMan · January 28, 2012

Are we going to get a new Lee McCulloch stats thread after every poor result that he's involved in as well as every win he's not involved in?

McCulloch has started 12 games

W = 4

D = 2

L = 6

A win % of 33%

A loss % of 50%

Games he hasnt started

W = 15

D = 4

L = 0

A win % of 79%

A loss % of 0%

:craphead:

theweebluenose · January 28, 2012

Don't need stats to show McCulloch is a poor player and offers little to our play.

deleteduser1 · January 28, 2012

Don't need stats to show McCulloch is a poor player and offers little to our play.

To be fair I think had a good spell at the club and made a more than decent contribution to the cause but without wishing to be too harsh on the guy he is now well past his sell by date and as I said in the Ortiz thread - if we don't have better young players coming through the youth system of our club than these 2 then it's time to close the gates of Murray Park and throw away the keys.

**Creampuff** · January 28, 2012

McCulloch has started 12 games
W = 4
D = 2
L = 6
A win % of 33%
A loss % of 50%
Games he hasnt started
W = 15
D = 4
L = 0
A win % of 79%
A loss % of 0%

:lol: :lol:

TheLawMan · February 11, 2012

Are we going to get a new Lee McCulloch stats thread after every poor result that he's involved in as well as every win he's not involved in?

McCulloch has started 13 games

W = 5

D = 2

L = 6

A win % of 38%

A loss % of 46%

Games he hasnt started

W = 15

D = 4

L = 1

A win % of 75%

A loss % of 5%

:craphead:

In all seriousness, he was superb today. :clap:

jdocherty72 · February 11, 2012

Aye nice stats.

He clearly wasn't being played in his natural position. Today however..

:sherlock:

**Creampuff** · February 12, 2012

McCulloch has started 13 games
W = 5
D = 2
L = 6
A win % of 38%
A loss % of 46%
Games he hasnt started
W = 15
D = 4
L = 1
A win % of 75%
A loss % of 5%

In all seriousness, he was superb today.

TheLawMan · February 18, 2012

Are we going to get a new Lee McCulloch stats thread after every poor result that he's involved in as well as every win he's not involved in?

McCulloch has started 14 games

W = 5

D = 2

L = 7

A win % of 36%

A loss % of 50%

Games he hasnt started

W = 15

D = 4

L = 1

A win % of 75%

A loss % of 5%

:craphead:

demise · February 18, 2012

Im not sure whether to laugh or cry at this at the moment... :anguish:

Updated McCulloch Stats

Recommended Posts

Link to post

Share on other sites

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Popular Now

Upcoming Events

Topics