HHB 63 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 I raised his warn level BP,we can't be seen to be weak.Do our rules allow for that punishment Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 Do our rules allow for that punishment I was in that much a hurry to punish him I failed to check,hopefully he just accepts it and says nothing Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted May 30, 2012 Author Share Posted May 30, 2012 I was in that much a hurry to punish him I failed to check,hopefully he just accepts it and says nothing The Court of Session are being notified. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 And people think fan ownership is workable Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 The Court of Session are being notified.WTF! Shutup! erm I can explain.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 I was in that much a hurry to punish him I failed to check,hopefully he just accepts it and says nothing Just wheel out some of your best mates and call them an "independent panel" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 And people think fan ownership is workable Would be very good for us if we could perhaps mimic the Swansea City supporters trust and have a seat on the board - their trust owns 20% of the club which makes them the second biggest shareholder.Swansea, of course, are a club that also very nearly went to the wall. And look what they have achieved by way of securing their position now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 Given FF Admin's eagerness to chop off-message threads and to ban "troublesome" posters, you would be excused for assuming any thread which stays on untouched represents de facto FF policy.As such, the OP is spot-on; FF are firmly anti-Green and we all know it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted May 31, 2012 Author Share Posted May 31, 2012 I'll try and avoid generalising again, but with Andy Kerr's statement the momentum seems to keep on building. Douglas Park has already told this shyster to step back but he is still running around trying to raise money. He should get the message loud and clear...F'k off Green you are not welcome. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Given FF Admin's eagerness to chop off-message threads and to ban "troublesome" posters, you would be excused for assuming any thread which stays on untouched represents de facto FF policy.As such, the OP is spot-on; FF are firmly anti-Green and we all know it.A stupid point based on flawed logic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lau03143 84 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 I have to admit I do not agree with the fact the CVA proposal is a loan to the club it has to pay back! So they loan us the money, we pay them back with interest and then they sell the club and make a huge profit?But what can we do?Who's got the money to do that? Noone! Anyone would want to recoup their investment.The administrators have to go with the bid with the largest cash value for them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.