Jump to content

Stripping titles doesn't necessarily mean handing them to the runners up


Peasie

Recommended Posts

what court case would that be?

i wasnt aware an SFA investigation was taken to court?

which 1 was it :

wild west showdown?

sheriff court?

high court?

US supreme court?

the hague?

intergalactic super court?

none of the above and your a bell end for not figuring out the ppl who decide this are the same ppl trying to kill our club every day??

OMFG!! Your talking about the FTTT you muppet. Was that not a court case?
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

you are a total cretin cant you read u total moron?????

this discussion is nothing to do with FTTT!!!!! ITS ABOUT THE DUAL CONTRACTS

I only see one moron in this thread.

Let my type slowly for you. If there were dual contracts, the FTTT would have been over and done with 3 years ago and not still awaiting a decision from 3 of the highest judges in the land.

The SPL case for EBTs is nothing more than an attempt by a vindictive, hate filled rival sitting in a position of power attempting to abuse (they are good at that) their power to try and close the gap they could never do on the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who is talking about the FTTT???

u got brain damage from huffing glue...

just because you cant figure our while there is some relationship between the FTTT and the dual contracts investigations they are both being investigated by 2 distinct bodies and are not the SAME FUCKING THING...

if the people on here could learn 1 thing that would make all our lives better it would be that

I was talking about the FTTT and you quoted me :lol:

I think 'the people on here' have learnt a few things today :sherlock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK on the subject of the dual contracts can we all agree charles green/his lawyers have now seen all the paperwork as he has owned the club for long enough yes?#

IF charles green agrees to the title stripping we will know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are in the wrong? as if we were not he would fight it all the way

or will we simply claim hes a tim in disguise like morons?

No, why would CG see paperwork from a MIH then CW company? He bought the assets and goodwill not the financial history.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they are scum and have no shame.

This.

On Radio Scotland a few weeks back, when they were talking to Kevin Kyle and Douglas Alexander (journalist?) and this topic came up. The journo mentioned the prospect of this happening and then started saying that it would cause so much more damage. Think about players of teams we've beaten in cup finals who could easily try and claim a 'win' bonus due to them. If you want to take these titles away, then void them. You can't hand titles to clubs who weren't up to it on the park ie Mowbray's Celtic.

Titles are won on the pitch in my eyes. Like said above, we've lived through these moments and you can't erase them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE FTTT U FUCKING MONGO!

OMFG AGAIN!!

Look back through the thread, you, yes YOU quoted someone talking about the FTTT. I quoted your response to this quote(about the FTTT, incase you forgot) and you try a long attempt at a put down to try make me look stupid when infact, you have done it to yourself. Sorry bud, but YOU were talking about the FTTT, not the SPL investigation, which I know is a totally different thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pretty sure this has been covered

they paid 1 useless fud with an EBT and it wasnt a contractual obligation it was a pay off to say we wasted loads of money on you and your shite fuck off....

+ as also stated before why would u want to trade 5 for 1 with the tims? and it might not even be 5 the first talk about it was 7

I dont want to trade anythin wi they cunts, so you can get that out of your head. And i dont give a flying fuck what the EBT was for, the used it to pay a player. If we're wrong, so are they, its not about how many times and for how many years.

Talk of 7 is fuckin nonsense, end of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes Charles Green the financial wizard... he obviously didnt want to see any paperwork at all did he? im sure he had absolutely no interest in any documents that might make him or the company he now is in charge of libale for anything.... and im sure he also didnt want to see the background information to any deal he has ever done before ... i think that being the case we should all go to the casino and put it all on black then close our eyes and put our fingers in our ears so we have no idea whats going on and hope someone tells us we won cos thats the way you make money....

Reds a better bet :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said. A lot of people (I use the term loosely) are saying that the FTTT and the dual contracts aren't connected. Well I would say the opposite is true. If there were dual contracts the FTTT would have been over before it started as we couldn't have claimed that payments were non-contractual. The fact it has dragged on without conclusion suggests to me that there are no dual contracts and may only be , as you say, demonstrations of what could be paid.

TELEGRAM FOR MONGO!!!where is the quote you fucking gluebag he says he thinks they are totally connected and thats his opinion before he brought in the FTTT the discussion was all about SFA dual contract investigation and not about the FTTT CLEAR ENUFF MONGO??the hmrc investigation has provided not 1 single piece of evidence to the SFA as it would be against the law to share the info without reason

Dear oh dear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you re-post your post for him? He doesn't quite grasp that even that you wrote FTTT twice in it, you were talking about something else that only he knows. What a walloper.

Someone on here used to have a sig along the lines of 'don't argue with an idiot he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience'. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

TELEGRAM FOR MONGO!!!

where is the quote you fucking gluebag he says he thinks they are totally connected and thats his opinion before he brought in the FTTT the discussion was all about SFA dual contract investigation and not about the FTTT CLEAR ENUFF MONGO??

the hmrc investigation has provided not 1 single piece of evidence to the SFA as it would be against the law to share the info without reason

I responded directly to a comment about the FTTT. I know full well the difference the between the court case and the SPL investigation, which being guilty of one doesn't automatically make you guilty of the other. Just like big Jock, I know.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 05 May 2024 12:00 Until 14:00
      0  
      Rangers v Kilmarnock
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football HD

×
×
  • Create New...