Ibroxblue 131 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 McGregor 6 - some good saves (some a bit Hollywood), poor on crosses, questionable at the second goal.Hutton 5 - Some good runs upfield, often shocking end productSvensson 6 - decent gameHemdani 4 - not his positionPapac 5 - did OKClement 6 - put in a good shift, unluckily bookedFerguson 6 - not at his best, but didn't play badlyAdam 5 - worked hard, maybe tired in the second halfSionko 5 - not too bad but can do moreNovo 6 - worked very hard as usual but not much qualitySebo 5 - not that bad, not that good, still has it all to prove Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swagger 8,944 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor 8Hutton 5Svennson 5Hemdani 5Papac 4Sionko 5Clement 8Ferguson 7Adam 5Novo 5Sebo 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 McGregor 6 - some good saves (some a bit Hollywood), poor on crosses, questionable at the second goal.Hutton 5 - Some good runs upfield, often shocking end productSvensson 6 - decent gameHemdani 4 - not his positionPapac 5 - did OKClement 6 - put in a good shift, unluckily bookedFerguson 6 - not at his best, but didn't play badlyAdam 5 - worked hard, maybe tired in the second halfSionko 5 - not too bad but can do moreNovo 6 - worked very hard as usual but not much qualitySebo 5 - not that bad, not that good, still has it all to prove AM: 9 Superb.Sionko: 6 Gave it a go.The rest = 5 bar Sebo who got 3 for effort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 McGregor 8Hutton 5Svensson 6Hemdani 5Papac 5Clement 7Ferguson 6Adam 4Sionko 6Novo 5Sebo 6 I would say Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cogsy69uk 62 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 McGregor - 9 - Reason: Kept us in the game with some excellent saves.Hutton - 4 - Reason: Poor distribution at crucial times and slack defending.Papac - 2 - Absolute Bollocks, played 4 players onside for their 1st goal yes 4, never a Rangers player. GTFSvensonn - 8 - Reason - Ever improving CB - Did really well under pressureHemdani - 6 - If he is a centre back, my Da is Hulk Hogan, did ok at times.Adam - 5 - Reserve player at best. Please do not fling any "Albertz" comparisons, not good enough for Rangers midfieldClement - 5 - Needs to do more, really poor tonight.Ferguson - 7 - Brief flourishes of what we expect, poor midfield combinations by PLG is holding our captain back.Sionko - 6 - Pish, had excellent game against Dons but unable (or ill-advised?) to re-produce same game tonight. Do ICT really pose a left wing threat??????????????????????????????????????????Novo - 8 - Perfect guise at penalty, played his heart out again, 3 cheers.Sebo - 0 - Mince, ASDA beef mince infact, 90p 1lb in ASDA, ?1.8 million from Austria Vienna, if he ever scores again for Rangers (Don't forget he has 2 in 19 games!!) I will buy every forum member a pint. Pish Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Papac - 2 - Absolute Bollocks, played 4 players onside for their 1st goal yes 4, never a Rangers player. GTF Was that not Svensson to whom you gave an eight <yes> ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cogsy69uk 62 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Papac   - 2 - Absolute Bollocks, played 4 players onside for their 1st goal yes 4, never a Rangers player. GTFWas that not Svensson to whom you gave an eight <yes> ? Yes, compared to the 4, 2 & 6 I gave Hutton, Papac and Hemdani respectively, I thought big Svensonn was one of the better performers on an otherwise miserable night, what would your rating have been? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 I mean it was Svensson playing everyone onsidePlus my ratings are just up the thread a bit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gleem 14 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor 10Hutton 1Svennson 1Hemdani 1Papac 1Sionko 1Clement 1Ferguson 1Adam 1Novo 1Sebo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor 10Hutton 1Svennson 1Hemdani 1Papac 1Sionko 1Clement 1Ferguson 1Adam 1Novo 1Sebo 1 Bah humbug indeed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cogsy69uk 62 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 I mean it was Svensson playing everyone onsidePlus my ratings are just up the thread a bit Well, I thought it was Papac! Apologies if it was Svensonn, I will upgrade him to a 5. Svensonn?? I will drop him to a.......7, still thought he did well. Maybe time for another post, but should guys like Papac, Svensonn & Burke etc not be told to keep their hair length well below MULLET level? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gleem 14 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor 10Hutton 1Svennson 1Hemdani 1Papac 1Sionko 1Clement 1Ferguson 1Adam 1Novo 1Sebo 1 Bah humbug indeed very PS: arnt u goih to need to change your name from 2006? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue1872 2 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Why are some people giving clement shit ratings he was our best outfield player tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor 10Hutton 1Svennson 1Hemdani 1Papac 1Sionko 1Clement 1Ferguson 1Adam 1Novo 1Sebo 1 Bah humbug indeed very PS: arnt u goih to need to change your name from 2006? Awww shitCan someone do that for me?New topic material Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gleem 14 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor 10Hutton 1Svennson 1Hemdani 1Papac 1Sionko 1Clement 1Ferguson 1Adam 1Novo 1Sebo 1 Bah humbug indeed very PS: arnt u goih to need to change your name from 2006? Awww shitCan someone do that for me?New topic material how about 2008? wont need to change it for 2 years maybe how long it takes us to win the league again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cogsy69uk 62 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Why are some people giving clement shit ratings he was our best outfield player tonight. i thought he was average, no better, no worse. I think my rating and reason inidicate why?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gleem 14 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Why are some people giving clement shit ratings he was our best outfield player tonight. they were all P!sh tonight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricardopatrese 0 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Why are some people giving clement shit ratings he was our best outfield player tonight.they were all P!sh tonight Withdrawn - mistook you for someone else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 According to a few mates who were at the game and spoke to on the phone.McGregor-9Hutton-4Papac-4Svensson-4Hemdani-4Adam-4Sionko-6(1st half)Ferguson-6Clement-7Novo-5Sebo-3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
allyharp 2 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor was Amazing. Kept us in the game so many times, but I suppose there's a question mark hovering over the second goal.Novo was pretty decent too I thought.Apart from that the rest were all average or below. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,308 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mcgregor 9 Saved us from a thrashing.Hutton 7 Best of the back 4 in defence and attack but got no help.Svennson 3 Again no awareness or positional sense,a great asset for caley last night.Hemdani 4 Out of touchPapac 3 Poor and given absolutely no help by Adam or Sionko.Sionko 3 No effort on either flank and gave his full backs no protectionClement 6 Little praise but had a hell of a lot to cover.Ferguson 5 Thankless task, little options for telling passes and his boots gave him problems all night.Adam 3 Lazy, slow, made stupid decisions and should get his head back to earth.Novo 5 Tried hard but his forward partner was not on the same planet.Sebo 1 Abysmal and got worse as the game went on, cannot run with the ball,or pass, or shoot,or hold the ball. Caley's best player.Burke 1 Obviously hasn't worked on his crossing in his time off. No interest in tracking back.Lennon 1 WHY BRING A KID ON IN THAT SITUATION AND BESIDE SEBO ???? (willy) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gleem 14 Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Why are some people giving clement shit ratings he was our best outfield player tonight.they were all P!sh tonight Withdrawn - mistook you for someone else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts