rangersxfc 265 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 The Compliance Officer has issued the following Notice of Complaint:Alleged Party in Breach: Celtic FCMatch: Celtic v Norwich CityDate: 24th July 2012Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached:(1) Disciplinary Rule 26 (Failing to take all such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure the good conduct and behaviour of Celtic FC supporters at Celtic Park during the above match: by failing to prevent said supporters from bringing into the ground and displaying an offensive banner.)(2) Disciplinary Rule 28 (Failing to take all such steps as are reasonably practicable to prevent misbehaviour by spectators at the above match: by failing to prevent spectators from bringing into the ground and displaying an offensive banner.)(3) Disciplinary Rule 31 ((i) Failing to ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable, that policies and procedures have been adopted and implemented to prevent instances of Unacceptable Conduct: by failing to prevent spectators at the above match from bringing into the ground and displaying an offensive banner and; (ii) by failing to deal effectively with an instance of Unacceptable Conduct: by allowing spectators to retain possession of said offensive banner after it had been initially displayed, which allowed them to display the banner on a second occasion during the above match.)(4) Disciplinary Rule 32 (Failing to ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable, that supporters of Celtic FC did not engage in Unacceptable Conduct at the above match: by failing to prevent said supporters from bringing into the ground and displaying an offensive banner.)Principal Hearing Date: Thursday, 11th October 2012Celtic FC have until Thursday, 27th September 2012 to respond to the Notice of Complaint.Rule 26: A club shall take all such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure the safety, good conduct and behaviour of its supporters on any ground. A club playing at its own ground or allowing its ground to be used for a match in which it is not participating shall also take all such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure the safety, good conduct and behaviour of all spectators at that ground.Rule 28: Any misbehaviour by spectators before, during or at the close of a match resulting from the failure of a club or recognised football body to take all reasonably practicable steps to avoid the misbehaviour shall render that club or recognised football body liable to any combination of sanctions provided in this Protocol.Rule 31: A club playing at its own ground or allowing its ground to be used for a match in which it is not participating must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, (i) good order and security; (ii) that policies and procedures have been adopted and are implemented to prevent instances of Unacceptable Conduct; and (iii) that any instance of Unacceptable Conduct is effectively dealt with, all at its own ground, on the occasion of a match.Rule 32: Each club must ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable, that its players, officials, supporters and any person exercising a function for or in connection with the club do not engage in Unacceptable Conduct at any club’s ground on the occasion of a match. Any failure by a club to discharge a requirement to which it is subject by virtue of Article 28.6 and this Article 28.7 shall constitute a breach of these Articlesthe media never reported this at the time shame on them Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Bit late are they not? They played Norwich in July or something? Or is this u just came across this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Seems very convenient at the moment, why were they not punished for banners with coffins on them or ira banners.I take it nothing happened with this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Seems very convenient at the moment, why were they not punished for banners with coffins on them or ira banners.I take it nothing happened with this.Was that the game against us they had these? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangersxfc 265 Posted September 20, 2012 Author Share Posted September 20, 2012 Seems very convenient at the moment, why were they not punished for banners with coffins on them or ira banners.I take it nothing happened with this.its for the zombie banner that no one in the press saw fit to report helluva bloody nose for the media Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Was that the game against us they had these?The game in April at their Midden.The scum brigade are meant to have all their banners vetted so obviously the scum heirachy thought they were ok. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP-FOREVER 5,231 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 the media never reported this at the time shame on themIt's their media - loowell wouldn't let them print a bad report against the angelic club on the outside, but the most corrupt, demonic club on the inside. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 31,348 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 its for the zombie banner that no one in the press saw fit to report helluva bloody nose for the mediaIs there any pics of said banner ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
soulboy 2,526 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Was that the game against us they had these?It says it was the game against norwich in july and the hearing is next month Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
50ShadesofBlue 667 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Link to photo: CAUTION: Link contains scum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Is there any pics of said banner ?Search google we wont want them posted here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 31,348 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Link to photo: CAUTION: Link contains scum.Thanks for posting. It will be interesting to see the outcome of this, probably fuck all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger50champ 300 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Means fuck all to me because nothing will happen and if it does it will be for a reason ie to look as if there clamping down on Beggars possibly because of what's ahead with us and it would appear that they were being even handed on who there punishing.There Sfa and Spl are corrupt and we know that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 It says it was the game against norwich in july and the hearing is next monthI know that's what there talking about. But this was a different game i think? Where they had a coffin in the crowd i think that was against us? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP-FOREVER 5,231 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/celtic/191158-celtic-hit-with-scottish-fa-charge-for-fans-display-of-zombie-banner/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 627 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Link to photo: CAUTION: Link contains scum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP-FOREVER 5,231 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 From the piggery. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Notice how many Guests/Beasts are viewing this thread now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 627 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Seems very convenient at the moment, why were they not punished for banners with coffins on them or ira banners.I take it nothing happened with this.They asked the scum and they said they did not see it! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeney 241 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Tin hat on but I can't see the problem with that banner. Rival clubs are always going to rip the piss out of each other, it's part of what id call banter between fans and we have given worse than that over the years IMO. Don't think this will amount to anything and I don't think it should. How the SFA can deem that as offensive and not the IRA shite is genuinley astonishing though, and again highlights the incompetence of them as an organisation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
falwheel 222 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Tin hat on but I can't see the problem with that banner. Rival clubs are always going to rip the piss out of each other, it's part of what id call banter between fans and we have given worse than that over the years IMO. Don't think this will amount to anything and I don't think it should. How the SFA can deem that as offensive and not the IRA shite is genuinley astonishing though, and again highlights the incompetence of them as an organisation.This..who really cares. Some daft prick waves a banner, fuck them..Wind ups always been part of it. I had the pish ripped out of me by non Rangers supporters after we lost to QoS..Took it, laughed it off and next time I will rip he pish oot of them..hopefuly Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gers1690 194 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 They'll get a pathetic fine at most... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
#WATP 14 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Tin hat on but I can't see the problem with that banner. Rival clubs are always going to rip the piss out of each other, it's part of what id call banter between fans and we have given worse than that over the years IMO. Don't think this will amount to anything and I don't think it should. How the SFA can deem that as offensive and not the IRA shite is genuinley astonishing though, and again highlights the incompetence of them as an organisation.Completely agree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gandalf the Blue 1,384 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Ill bet if it was during a normal Scottish game then it wouldve been 'sweep, sweep' as normal. Seen as it was against an english side, they have to be seen to appear the non corrupt bigots they really are. Good point re the ira stuff, how this makes headlines before that filth is baffling. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robg58 319 Posted September 21, 2012 Share Posted September 21, 2012 Septik are facing a disciplinary charge which relates to an alleged offensive banner displayed by the rhabid horde at a pre season friendly against Norwich in July.The SFA last night issued a notice of complaint alleging 4 breaches of the rules.Failing to to prevent fans from bringing a banner into the ground and displaying it.Also charged with failing to deal effectively with an instance of unacceptable behaviour by allowing them to retain the banner after it had initially been displayed which allowed them to display the banner a second time.The banners were the ones of a gunman shooting a zombie figure next to a gravestone that depicted Rangers.They have been given till next Thursday to respond to the charges with a full hearing on the 11th of October. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.