Jump to content

Longmuir On Reconstruction


sergio

Recommended Posts

SFL Chief Executive David Longmuir has insisted that he has not agreed anything with the SPL or SFA regarding league reconstruction as his member clubs prepare to discuss the issues tomorrow.

He also agrees that it is wrong to sanction changes halfway through a season and understands fans’ feelings over the prospect of Rangers winning SFL 3 and not gaining a promotion.

However, Longmuir insists that the SFL have to seize the moment and take part in the process to try to drive a better structure and fairer system for the good of football.

Speaking exclusively to RangersTV, the League boss says it is crucial that one league body is formed, fairer governance is introduced as well as an improved financial distribution.

He said: “There is no done deal with the SPL and one of the things that Rangers fans will be interested to know is that I have never agreed to anything with the SPL or the SFA regarding league reconstruction.

“What I have agreed to do is take the proposal and look at it on its merits and present it to the clubs.

“As has been the track record, sense will come to the fore and I think we will get that tomorrow.

“I think we’re pleased that there seems to be some new found unanimity among the SPL clubs and it’s because of that opportunity we feel we have a number of things we can bring to improve the game.

“If you go back to my original proposal I was a key proponent of a larger top league but I do understand that this would mean fewer games and take finance out of the game.

“So what’s the best thing we can achieve at this moment including the big items such as one league body?

“When I came to the SFL five years ago I spoke to the SPL about one body because I felt we could market Scottish football more effectively but it was not seen as possible.

“Now we have an opportunity to do that. We also have an opportunity to have more equitable governance where every club has a say. We have an opportunity to have the current wealth spread a bit more fairly down the leagues.

“And we also have an opportunity to put in a pyramid structure.

“So do we sacrifice that opportunity on the basis that we don’t like two 12s and three eights?

“We are going to look at this at tomorrow’s meeting – two 12s and an 18 as it is currently.

“We might have something that might enhance and improve that because when you try to bring about change you have to bring the fans with you.

“At the moment I don’t think we have done that. The train is slowly leaving the platform but there are not enough people on the train.

“While I am in favour of larger leagues I think 18 is stretching it and perhaps there is a way we could accommodate two 10s and that would mean introducing two new clubs.

“That’s something we will look at and who knows who these two clubs will be?

“It would give us a format that has worked for years with play-offs, winning promotion and winning championships.

“I’m focusing on the big things and we have to take advantage of this new-found unanimity within SPL clubs.

“I’m hopeful that if we can capitalise on that then we can produce something for the good of the game.

“The SFL clubs will have their say tomorrow and I’m sure they will come back with a practical solution.

“I also fundamentally agree with fans who say that change should not be arranged halfway through a season.

“But if we leave it we could lose that unanimity that we have suddenly found again in Scottish football.

“So if the time is now then we have to play our part. I will try to steer our clubs to a sensible solution that’s good for the game. Perhaps there is a way of phasing this in and we will discuss that too.

“I can understand Rangers fans being unhappy with the prospect that Rangers could win SFL 3 and not be promoted.

“I am surrounded by Rangers fans at home so I know their feelings. I know where they are coming from but if we can put something sensible together then hopefully that issue will not arise.”

On Rangers TV ... and this from the Official Site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

“When I came to the SFL five years ago I spoke to the SPL about one body because I felt we could market Scottish football more effectively but it was not seen as possible.

Now all of a sudden the rush. :rolleyes:

“I am surrounded by Rangers fans at home so I know their feelings.

This statement is probably going to come back and bite him in the arse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SFL Chief Executive David Longmuir has insisted that he has not agreed anything with the SPL or SFA regarding league reconstruction as his member clubs prepare to discuss the issues tomorrow.

He also agrees that it is wrong to sanction changes halfway through a season and understands fans’ feelings over the prospect of Rangers winning SFL 3 and not gaining a promotion.

However, Longmuir insists that the SFL have to seize the moment and take part in the process to try to drive a better structure and fairer system for the good of football.

Speaking exclusively to RangersTV, the League boss says it is crucial that one league body is formed, fairer governance is introduced as well as an improved financial distribution.

He said: “There is no done deal with the SPL and one of the things that Rangers fans will be interested to know is that I have never agreed to anything with the SPL or the SFA regarding league reconstruction.

“What I have agreed to do is take the proposal and look at it on its merits and present it to the clubs.

“As has been the track record, sense will come to the fore and I think we will get that tomorrow.

“I think we’re pleased that there seems to be some new found unanimity among the SPL clubs and it’s because of that opportunity we feel we have a number of things we can bring to improve the game.

“If you go back to my original proposal I was a key proponent of a larger top league but I do understand that this would mean fewer games and take finance out of the game.

“So what’s the best thing we can achieve at this moment including the big items such as one league body?

“When I came to the SFL five years ago I spoke to the SPL about one body because I felt we could market Scottish football more effectively but it was not seen as possible.

“Now we have an opportunity to do that. We also have an opportunity to have more equitable governance where every club has a say. We have an opportunity to have the current wealth spread a bit more fairly down the leagues.

“And we also have an opportunity to put in a pyramid structure.

“So do we sacrifice that opportunity on the basis that we don’t like two 12s and three eights?

“We are going to look at this at tomorrow’s meeting – two 12s and an 18 as it is currently.

“We might have something that might enhance and improve that because when you try to bring about change you have to bring the fans with you.

“At the moment I don’t think we have done that. The train is slowly leaving the platform but there are not enough people on the train.

“While I am in favour of larger leagues I think 18 is stretching it and perhaps there is a way we could accommodate two 10s and that would mean introducing two new clubs.

“That’s something we will look at and who knows who these two clubs will be?

“It would give us a format that has worked for years with play-offs, winning promotion and winning championships.

“I’m focusing on the big things and we have to take advantage of this new-found unanimity within SPL clubs.

“I’m hopeful that if we can capitalise on that then we can produce something for the good of the game.

“The SFL clubs will have their say tomorrow and I’m sure they will come back with a practical solution.

“I also fundamentally agree with fans who say that change should not be arranged halfway through a season.

“But if we leave it we could lose that unanimity that we have suddenly found again in Scottish football.

“So if the time is now then we have to play our part. I will try to steer our clubs to a sensible solution that’s good for the game. Perhaps there is a way of phasing this in and we will discuss that too.

I can understand Rangers fans being unhappy with the prospect that Rangers could win SFL 3 and not be promoted.

“I am surrounded by Rangers fans at home so I know their feelings. I know where they are coming from but if we can put something sensible together then hopefully that issue will not arise.”

On Rangers TV ... and this from the Official Site

In Bold

Link to post
Share on other sites

SFL Chief Executive David Longmuir has insisted that he has not agreed anything with the SPL or SFA regarding league reconstruction as his member clubs prepare to discuss the issues tomorrow.

He also agrees that it is wrong to sanction changes halfway through a season and understands fans’ feelings over the prospect of Rangers winning SFL 3 and not gaining a promotion.

However, Longmuir insists that the SFL have to seize the moment and take part in the process to try to drive a better structure and fairer system for the good of football.

Speaking exclusively to RangersTV, the League boss says it is crucial that one league body is formed, fairer governance is introduced as well as an improved financial distribution.

He said: “There is no done deal with the SPL and one of the things that Rangers fans will be interested to know is that I have never agreed to anything with the SPL or the SFA regarding league reconstruction.

“What I have agreed to do is take the proposal and look at it on its merits and present it to the clubs.

“As has been the track record, sense will come to the fore and I think we will get that tomorrow.

“I think we’re pleased that there seems to be some new found unanimity among the SPL clubs and it’s because of that opportunity we feel we have a number of things we can bring to improve the game.

“If you go back to my original proposal I was a key proponent of a larger top league but I do understand that this would mean fewer games and take finance out of the game.

“So what’s the best thing we can achieve at this moment including the big items such as one league body?

“When I came to the SFL five years ago I spoke to the SPL about one body because I felt we could market Scottish football more effectively but it was not seen as possible.

“Now we have an opportunity to do that. We also have an opportunity to have more equitable governance where every club has a say. We have an opportunity to have the current wealth spread a bit more fairly down the leagues.

“And we also have an opportunity to put in a pyramid structure.

“So do we sacrifice that opportunity on the basis that we don’t like two 12s and three eights?

“We are going to look at this at tomorrow’s meeting – two 12s and an 18 as it is currently.

“We might have something that might enhance and improve that because when you try to bring about change you have to bring the fans with you.

“At the moment I don’t think we have done that. The train is slowly leaving the platform but there are not enough people on the train.

“While I am in favour of larger leagues I think 18 is stretching it and perhaps there is a way we could accommodate two 10s and that would mean introducing two new clubs.

“That’s something we will look at and who knows who these two clubs will be?

“It would give us a format that has worked for years with play-offs, winning promotion and winning championships.

“I’m focusing on the big things and we have to take advantage of this new-found unanimity within SPL clubs.

“I’m hopeful that if we can capitalise on that then we can produce something for the good of the game.

“The SFL clubs will have their say tomorrow and I’m sure they will come back with a practical solution.

“I also fundamentally agree with fans who say that change should not be arranged halfway through a season.

“But if we leave it we could lose that unanimity that we have suddenly found again in Scottish football.

“So if the time is now then we have to play our part. I will try to steer our clubs to a sensible solution that’s good for the game. Perhaps there is a way of phasing this in and we will discuss that too.

“I can understand Rangers fans being unhappy with the prospect that Rangers could win SFL 3 and not be promoted.

“I am surrounded by Rangers fans at home so I know their feelings. I know where they are coming from but if we can put something sensible together then hopefully that issue will not arise.”

On Rangers TV ... and this from the Official Site

I like this guy he should replace Rhegan and Doncaster two clueless fenian fuds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

“If you go back to my original proposal I was a key proponent of a larger top league but I do understand that this would mean fewer games and take finance out of the game."

The hypocrisy involved in this simple statement, and what is clearly the driving force in 'restructuring' is fucking unreal.

In the summer we got punted into Div 3 because chairmen had to "listen to the fans" and voted to do so, even though it would take finance out of the game... so much so even Motherwell publicly stated administration could very well be an outcome of that.

Now we're in a situation where NOBODY wants a 12 team league, nobody. But that does not matter, these clowns running ruining the game don't care about that anymore, they only care about finance & revenue.

So, the question we put forward is, why, when we found ourselves in the situation we did, did chairmen ignore financial consequences to adhere to their fans in that scenario, but this time round, ignore the fans and concentrate only on financial incentive?

The answer is quiet clearly a hatred of Rangers from the bigots, clear as day, yet Charles Green was hauled up at Hampden for stating what is there for everyone to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SFL Chief Executive David Longmuir has insisted that he has not agreed anything with the SPL or SFA regarding league reconstruction as his member clubs prepare to discuss the issues tomorrow.

He also agrees that it is wrong to sanction changes halfway through a season and understands fans’ feelings over the prospect of Rangers winning SFL 3 and not gaining a promotion.

However, Longmuir insists that the SFL have to seize the moment and take part in the process to try to drive a better structure and fairer system for the good of football.

Speaking exclusively to RangersTV, the League boss says it is crucial that one league body is formed, fairer governance is introduced as well as an improved financial distribution.

He said: “There is no done deal with the SPL and one of the things that Rangers fans will be interested to know is that I have never agreed to anything with the SPL or the SFA regarding league reconstruction.

“What I have agreed to do is take the proposal and look at it on its merits and present it to the clubs.

“As has been the track record, sense will come to the fore and I think we will get that tomorrow.

“I think we’re pleased that there seems to be some new found unanimity among the SPL clubs and it’s because of that opportunity we feel we have a number of things we can bring to improve the game.

“If you go back to my original proposal I was a key proponent of a larger top league but I do understand that this would mean fewer games and take finance out of the game.

“So what’s the best thing we can achieve at this moment including the big items such as one league body?

“When I came to the SFL five years ago I spoke to the SPL about one body because I felt we could market Scottish football more effectively but it was not seen as possible.

“Now we have an opportunity to do that. We also have an opportunity to have more equitable governance where every club has a say. We have an opportunity to have the current wealth spread a bit more fairly down the leagues.

“And we also have an opportunity to put in a pyramid structure.

“So do we sacrifice that opportunity on the basis that we don’t like two 12s and three eights?

“We are going to look at this at tomorrow’s meeting – two 12s and an 18 as it is currently.

“We might have something that might enhance and improve that because when you try to bring about change you have to bring the fans with you.

“At the moment I don’t think we have done that. The train is slowly leaving the platform but there are not enough people on the train.

“While I am in favour of larger leagues I think 18 is stretching it and perhaps there is a way we could accommodate two 10s and that would mean introducing two new clubs.

“That’s something we will look at and who knows who these two clubs will be?

“It would give us a format that has worked for years with play-offs, winning promotion and winning championships.

“I’m focusing on the big things and we have to take advantage of this new-found unanimity within SPL clubs.

“I’m hopeful that if we can capitalise on that then we can produce something for the good of the game.

“The SFL clubs will have their say tomorrow and I’m sure they will come back with a practical solution.

“I also fundamentally agree with fans who say that change should not be arranged halfway through a season.

“But if we leave it we could lose that unanimity that we have suddenly found again in Scottish football.

“So if the time is now then we have to play our part. I will try to steer our clubs to a sensible solution that’s good for the game. Perhaps there is a way of phasing this in and we will discuss that too.

“I can understand Rangers fans being unhappy with the prospect that Rangers could win SFL 3 and not be promoted.

“I am surrounded by Rangers fans at home so I know their feelings. I know where they are coming from but if we can put something sensible together then hopefully that issue will not arise.”

On Rangers TV ... and this from the Official Site

:matron:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he will be bought just like the rest, Nobody seems willing to stand up against the bigots currently running the SPL/sfa.

During the summer I really thought he was different. But it seems he is happy to play along to their tune.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought the same but seems his thoughts have changed with the promise of a bit of power.

It corrupts.

He could have been at the head of the move for reconstruction, instead it appears he'll be happy to play second or even third fiddle behind regan and doncaster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he will be bought just like the rest, Nobody seems willing to stand up against the bigots currently running the SPL/sfa.

Maybe the boycott on Saturday will be a start of us Standing up to SPL/SFA somebody has got to make a start might as we well be the best supported club in the Country

Link to post
Share on other sites

If everything in the Garden was rosy, then he wouldn't need to put a statement out, and to do so on Rangers TV is worrying.

He is letting the world know that even though we do not have a vote on this, he has been to see Charlie, maybe he is looking for us to influence the other SFL clubs.

If I was a betting man, I would say that there is no unity among the SFL clubs and I can see them veto's this for something else, which might be similar but gives us a promotion to a higher league but will not alter the timeline it would take to get us there ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 06 October 2024 19:00 Until 21:00
      0  
      Rangers v St. Johnstone
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...