*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 here's the complete record:We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?Any thoughts?Here fishy fishy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 941 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 here's the complete record:We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?Any thoughts?Here fishy fishyDid Celtic not hammer us in the 1st ever game between the sides? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 28, 2007 Author Share Posted June 28, 2007 here's the complete record:We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?Any thoughts?Here fishy fishyDid Celtic not hammer us in the 1st ever game between the sides?5-2 I think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza 21 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 There can be no excuses. The stats speak for themselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambo 197 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 here's the complete record:We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?Any thoughts?Here fishy fishySurely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 505 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 The first catch of the day is always the tastiest... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 28, 2007 Author Share Posted June 28, 2007 here's the complete record:We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?Any thoughts?Here fishy fishySurely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed? It's all of the OF matches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 941 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 Surely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed? I think he meant we had an unfair advantage of 15 years preparation.That's why I said that it could have meant nothing, as they done us 5-2 in the 1st ever OF game! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza 21 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 here's the complete record:We're obviously well ahead as would be expected.But I often wonder how much that is down to us being formed 15 years before them?Any thoughts?Here fishy fishySurely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed? I thought that too. I think its more to do with us being an established club when they first came into being... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 28, 2007 Author Share Posted June 28, 2007 Surely the record you show here doesn't include games before Celtic were formed? I think he meant we had an unfair advantage of 15 years preparation.No I didn't I was just fishing ya bassa!As you can see if you look really closely at the first post.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 941 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 No I didn't I was just fishing ya bassa!As you can see if you look really closely at the first post....Bassa is it?I'll have you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 manticore you have caught plenty of fish in your time you are a top class fisherman. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 We are, and always will be number 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 766 Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 If someone had the time. they could work out for each decade, how many games both teams have won over the sample period. Then you could analysis the periods both teams were better and can exclude the first decade if its irrelvent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 29, 2007 Author Share Posted June 29, 2007 Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days.Well you can say that.But they never had a chance to beat us for 15 years, surely that must affect the figures?C'mon, take a wee bite, you know you want to... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days.Well you can say that.But they never had a chance to beat us for 15 years, surely that must affect the figures?C'mon, take a wee bite, you know you want to...Don't see how, as the figures are based on Rangers vs Celtic... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 29, 2007 Author Share Posted June 29, 2007 Using the fact that we were formed first as a reason for our better record makes little sense. They went 4-1 ahead in Scottish titles in the early days.Well you can say that.But they never had a chance to beat us for 15 years, surely that must affect the figures?C'mon, take a wee bite, you know you want to...Don't see how, as the figures are based on Rangers vs Celtic...At last. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,291 Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 hook line and sinker Manticore, well done my friend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted June 29, 2007 Author Share Posted June 29, 2007 hook line and sinker Manticore, well done my friend.I had to put some work in to land that one.Now, what was I saying about David Murray :pipehorse: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delparlane 6,033 Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 Kudos to you for doing your homework Manticore, but I didn't need a table to tell me we are the better side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts