Jump to content

English Football


Clemdog

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said:

No, the one that actually hits his arm.

And, I don’t think it hits Havertz on the arm before, and obviously var don’t since they chopped it off for the one after it hits Cash.

It hits Havertz hand before Cash, watch it back.

The goal is disallowed for hitting Havertz arm, before it touches Cash's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Somemightsay7 said:

It hits Havertz hand before Cash, watch it back.

The goal is disallowed for hitting Havertz arm, before it touches Cash's.

If it’s disallowed for hitting his arm before Cash’s then it’s not for handball because it hits his chest :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said:

That’s his chest, not his arm.

Again, why would they keep replaying the one it hits his arm after it hits Cash, if that’s the handball they were giving? 

That’s never a hand ball :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say VAR is a dug's dinner, but that would be an insult to canine food.

 

The mess that they've made with this is just unbelievable.  At this stage nobody can argue that VAR has improved match officiating.  

 

That Havertz handball is simply unbelievable.

 

There was clearly not deliberate handballs going on.

It hits the Villa player in the arm, clearly.

It's inconclusive if it then hits Havertz arm (AFTER hitting the Villa player).

 

Yet somehow, some way, they arrive at the conclusion it's an offence commited by Havertz!?   There's a better case for a goal, or even a penalty.  

 

just bin it an go back to have the ref make calls on the field, it was much better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RealWorldRich said:

I would say VAR is a dug's dinner, but that would be an insult to canine food.

 

The mess that they've made with this is just unbelievable.  At this stage nobody can argue that VAR has improved match officiating.  

 

That Havertz handball is simply unbelievable.

 

There was clearly not deliberate handballs going on.

It hits the Villa player in the arm, clearly.

It's inconclusive if it then hits Havertz arm (AFTER hitting the Villa player).

 

Yet somehow, some way, they arrive at the conclusion it's an offence commited by Havertz!?   There's a better case for a goal, or even a penalty.  

 

just bin it an go back to have the ref make calls on the field, it was much better.

He's a cunt but the likes of Lineker changing his mind on it is good imo. I'd love to see the game without it again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

VAR can work, but they need to change the rules and how it's used.

The handball rule needs reworked as it's a mess, both for defenders and attackers.

Semi-Automated offsides have to come in next season as they make it significantly faster.

Other than red card offences and offsides, VAR shouldn't be used outside the box. Fuck off with this going back 50 yards to see if a foul has been committed. 

With those 3 in place I'd be happy with it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 06 October 2024 19:00 Until 21:00
      0  
      Rangers v St. Johnstone
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
×
×
  • Create New...