Coplandrear25 232 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 I gave it a year before it exploded into carnage. Way out in my forecast. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 "I have today finally received a reply from William Cowie one of the sitting directors regarding my query about what the state of play was with the re-engagement of the two directors stating "The remaining directors do not have the powers to reappoint directors, therefore that's why I was thinking of a sub group capacity". This is contrary to the organisation’s memorandum and articles which clearly allows the sitting directors to reappoint them, hopefully they will take cognisance of the governing document." Posted on FF by the OP Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mully10 8 Posted May 6, 2017 Author Share Posted May 6, 2017 Thanks for your range or replies, never really been on Rangers Media but welcome to the madhouse! I dont really know about the origins of C1872 but surely if the board of an organisation is led by good Rangers people who dont have an interest in getting something out of it but fan ownership and allowing the fans to have a voice then it cannot be a bad thing. All of the politics saddens me, we are all Rangers fans of which I will forever be proud but we have an awful habit of turning on each other. Maybe I am naive but I want this to succeed, you will never make everybody happy but I think its something worth fighting for. On a side note I never got my big cup from Mike Ashley, I am totally gutted) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 17 minutes ago, Young Bob said: "I have today finally received a reply from William Cowie one of the sitting directors regarding my query about what the state of play was with the re-engagement of the two directors stating "The remaining directors do not have the powers to reappoint directors, therefore that's why I was thinking of a sub group capacity". This is contrary to the organisation’s memorandum and articles which clearly allows the sitting directors to reappoint them, hopefully they will take cognisance of the governing document." Posted on FF by the OP The trough guzzlers have everyone else well sullied. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 24 minutes ago, mully10 said: Thanks for your range or replies, never really been on Rangers Media but welcome to the madhouse! I dont really know about the origins of C1872 but surely if the board of an organisation is led by good Rangers people who dont have an interest in getting something out of it but fan ownership and allowing the fans to have a voice then it cannot be a bad thing. All of the politics saddens me, we are all Rangers fans of which I will forever be proud but we have an awful habit of turning on each other. Maybe I am naive but I want this to succeed, you will never make everybody happy but I think its something worth fighting for. On a side note I never got my big cup from Mike Ashley, I am totally gutted) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 1 hour ago, mully10 said: Thanks for your range or replies, never really been on Rangers Media but welcome to the madhouse! I dont really know about the origins of C1872 but surely if the board of an organisation is led by good Rangers people who dont have an interest in getting something out of it but fan ownership and allowing the fans to have a voice then it cannot be a bad thing. All of the politics saddens me, we are all Rangers fans of which I will forever be proud but we have an awful habit of turning on each other. Maybe I am naive but I want this to succeed, you will never make everybody happy but I think its something worth fighting for. On a side note I never got my big cup from Mike Ashley, I am totally gutted) So you were never a member of rst or rf? How are you going to respond to Director William seeing as he doesnt know the articles of association? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Blue Avenger said: The trough guzzlers have everyone else well sullied. Thats the way to remain in control. Just reading that response from WC to Mully it struck me that C1872 are fond of their sub groups and committees. Guess it gives the underlings a sense of power and importance and keeps them in line. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman36 3,456 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 3 hours ago, mully10 said: I dont really know about the origins of C1872 but surely if the board of an organisation is led by good Rangers people who dont have an interest in getting something out of it but fan ownership and allowing the fans to have a voice then it cannot be a bad thing. All of the politics saddens me, we are all Rangers fans of which I will forever be proud but we have an awful habit of turning on each other. Maybe I am naive but I want this to succeed, you will never make everybody happy but I think its something worth fighting for. I dunno, early doors posting in this style tends not to end well. One for the watch list I'd say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtuoso 27,180 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 8 minutes ago, Gman36 said: I dunno, early doors posting in this style tends not to end well. One for the watch list I'd say. Definitely. He posted the same on FF: http://forum.followfollow.com/showthread.php?1109552-Club-1872 100 posts in 11 years Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Nobody does drama better than Rangers supporters organisations. More division than an entire year of studying maths. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 19 hours ago, Virtuoso said: Definitely. He posted the same on FF: http://forum.followfollow.com/showthread.php?1109552-Club-1872 100 posts in 11 years He's a Bear, mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 23 hours ago, mully10 said: Thanks for your range or replies, never really been on Rangers Media but welcome to the madhouse! I dont really know about the origins of C1872 but surely if the board of an organisation is led by good Rangers people who dont have an interest in getting something out of it but fan ownership and allowing the fans to have a voice then it cannot be a bad thing. All of the politics saddens me, we are all Rangers fans of which I will forever be proud but we have an awful habit of turning on each other. Maybe I am naive but I want this to succeed, you will never make everybody happy but I think its something worth fighting for. On a side note I never got my big cup from Mike Ashley, I am totally gutted) 19 hours ago, Virtuoso said: Definitely. He posted the same on FF: http://forum.followfollow.com/showthread.php?1109552-Club-1872 100 posts in 11 years 10 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said: He's a Bear, mate. There's an easy way to settle it. Last one to Pledge is a rotten egg... http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/topic/306989-rangersmedia-erskine-fund- new-season-new-membership-pledge-your-support-here/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.