Progress ? we haven't beaten them in reg in 12 games.

[backup 4,724]

4 hours ago, HG5 said:

We have a lad who’s shown big game bottle before - we seem afraid to use him!

Just leaves the managerial question then, if that is the case.

[HG5 11,114]

2 minutes ago, backup said:

Just leaves the managerial question then, if that is the case.

Sure does!

If he’s going to make the grade, he needs to get over the fear of losing, cos it happened anyway.

 

[backup 4,724]

People still think we have progressed ?

[kaiser1041 9,088]

We have regressed but so have the tims haven’t beat killie the tims or hibs at ibrox in 6 games,

get the cheerleader to fuck 

[backup 4,724]

On 11/03/2018 at 19:57, backup said:

Can failing in 12 games to beat the taigs be really seen as any sort of progress, it looks to me as if we are running flat out to be a distant second now.

That is no sort of progress for The Rangers and is not what should be expected or accepted by any of us. 

How do those who insisted we have progressed feel about the situation now ?

[Dlydon81 245]

On 11/03/2018 at 20:08, KingKirk said:

The other  side of it we should of beaten them in the last 2 games

The new year game I’d agree we should have won.  The 3-2 game, however, I have no idea why some of our fans think we should have won it.  They beat us with ten men and were comfortable for it other than Fredo’s sitter.  

The game at the weekend was as bad a performance as any of the 5-1 games for me.

[285miles 502]

agree that yesterday was an embarrasing disgrace but in this context :-

1. 6 years in the champions league and we have 0

2. Selling good players at profit eg van dijk waynama so their curent squad has paid for itself

3. Rodgers one of the better managers in the country who nearly won the epl

4. Any other side in spl. who gets a win against them is a flash in the pan.The sheep's last result against them ?

We need a board with 3 times the financial clout than we have at the moment.

 

[Dlydon81 245]

20 hours ago, 285miles said:

agree that yesterday was an embarrasing disgrace but in this context :-

1. 6 years in the champions league and we have 0

2. Selling good players at profit eg van dijk waynama so their curent squad has paid for itself

3. Rodgers one of the better managers in the country who nearly won the epl

4. Any other side in spl. who gets a win against them is a flash in the pan.The sheep's last result against them ?

We need a board with 3 times the financial clout than we have at the moment.

 

I agree it is unrealistic to expect us to compete just yet but none of that explains just how bad we are.  Most other teams have been able to give a good account of themselves with only the odd drubbing.

[K.A.I 36,183]

20 hours ago, 285miles said:

agree that yesterday was an embarrasing disgrace but in this context :-

1. 6 years in the champions league and we have 0

2. Selling good players at profit eg van dijk waynama so their curent squad has paid for itself

3. Rodgers one of the better managers in the country who nearly won the epl

4. Any other side in spl. who gets a win against them is a flash in the pan.The sheep's last result against them ?

We need a board with 3 times the financial clout than we have at the moment.

 

5- The majority of the team we beat on penalties and outplayed at Hampden under Delia are still mainstays in Rogers side. 

We have not progressed from that day - just had some false dawns instead.

Even when they were in the state we were in, in the early 90's and 20 minutes from going the wall and were signing shite like Paul Byrne, Stuart Slater, Wayne Biggins, Wullie Falconer, Rudi Vata and we had McCoist, Goram, Gough, Hateley, Durrant, Ferguson, McCall, Steven etc they never once went 12 games without a win against us ... maybe 3 games max, they'd come to Ibrox and beat us on occassion. 

We are absolutely nowhere near them as it stands. Anyone saying so after the 3-2 game a few weeks ago needs to give their heads a shake.