Friedmarsbar 1 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 I have seen lots of posters up in arms about Hartley signing(especially on FF) going on about an article where he called us 'orange bastards' and how he hates usand is a' bigot'.Fine,then these same posters refer to him as a 'tarrier,fenian bastard,scumbag,lowlife'. Can they not see the irony in taking up a stance like that.To be quite honest this type of Rangers supporter embarasses me and if they stop supporting rangers because of this,to be quite blunt, the club will be better off.The day we welcome a player because of his skill without talk of his backgroundis the day we will be free of bigotry, and let's hope it will be soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 But many fans dislike for him have nothing to do with bigotry or his background....its the fact that he formerly stated in a fanzine that he would like to shit on us and that we were in his words..."orange bastards". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,115 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Yes but look how Rangers fans are still getting villified by some 'agencies' for sectarianism yet we as a club and support have moved on and don't like getting tarnished like this, so why not be big about this and let hartley get over his past? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeAndMyWeePalJoe 17 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 But many fans dislike for him have nothing to do with bigotry or his background....its the fact that he formerly stated in a fanzine that he would like to shit on us and that we were in his words..."orange bastards". <sesm> I don't know if he said these things or not. He may have or some muppet in Millwall that wrote the fanzine artical may have, but I cannot imagine a guy who thought like that wanting to pull on the blue of Rangers...And according to the artical in tonights evening times he wants a move to Rangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillinger 0 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 I'm not Hartley's biggest fan but personally I think its time to forgive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc72 0 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 But many fans dislike for him have nothing to do with bigotry or his background....its the fact that he formerly stated in a fanzine that he would like to shit on us and that we were in his words..."orange bastards".<sesm> I don't know if he said these things or not. He may have or some muppet in Millwall that wrote the fanzine artical may have, but I cannot imagine a guy who thought like that wanting to pull on the blue of Rangers...And according to the artical in tonights evening times he wants a move to Rangers. A heard that on radio clyde he will be desperate to get out of Hearts but if celtic end up puttin a bid in for him he will go there a wouldnt take it to serious because a dnt see it happenin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 I'm not Hartley's biggest fan but personally I think its time to forgive. Forgive?..........YesSign him?........No Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Y'know, there's something many folk forget; when folk sue papers, and they didn't make the comment, the papers almost always settle out of court.Usually, if they don't sue or take it up with their lawyer, it's because they have a genuine case to answer.But the fact Hartley took this up with his lawyer supports the notion that he simply did not say it. And bear in mind it was WELL before he was linked to us.Yes, he's a Celtic supporter, but I STRONGLY doubt he'd insult his close friend Barry Ferguson in this way.I wish folk would look at the evidence, rather than being blinded by their own prejudices. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,115 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Y'know, there's something many folk forget; when folk sue papers, and they didn't make the comment, the papers almost always settle out of court.Usually, if they don't sue or take it up with their lawyer, it's because they have a genuine case to answer.But the fact Hartley took this up with his lawyer supports the notion that he simply did not say it. And bear in mind it was WELL before he was linked to us.Yes, he's a Celtic supporter, but I STRONGLY doubt he'd insult his close friend Barry Ferguson in this way.I wish folk would look at the evidence, rather than being blinded by their own prejudices. well put danny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeAndMyWeePalJoe 17 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Y'know, there's something many folk forget; when folk sue papers, and they didn't make the comment, the papers almost always settle out of court.Usually, if they don't sue or take it up with their lawyer, it's because they have a genuine case to answer.But the fact Hartley took this up with his lawyer supports the notion that he simply did not say it. And bear in mind it was WELL before he was linked to us.Yes, he's a Celtic supporter, but I STRONGLY doubt he'd insult his close friend Barry Ferguson in this way.I wish folk would look at the evidence, rather than being blinded by their own prejudices. well put danny Indeed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friedmarsbar 1 Posted January 9, 2007 Author Share Posted January 9, 2007 'Blinded by their own prejudices',Danny,could not have put it better!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albahighlander 0 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 My feeling is that those who let it be known that they are taking it up with their lawyers are usually 100% guilty.Those who are innocent usually just go ahead and sue without letting anything be known.I hear Boyd is taking Le Guen's comments up with his lawyers, I'll bet a million quid nothing further happens on that front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 My feeling is that those who let it be known that they are taking it up with their lawyers are usually 100% guilty.Those who are innocent usually just go ahead and sue without letting anything be known.I hear Boyd is taking Le Guen's comments up with his lawyers, I'll bet a million quid nothing further happens on that front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,115 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 My feeling is that those who let it be known that they are taking it up with their lawyers are usually 100% guilty.Those who are innocent usually just go ahead and sue without letting anything be known.I hear Boyd is taking Le Guen's comments up with his lawyers, I'll bet a million quid nothing further happens on that front. Boydy is thinking about it over a pint of Tennants and a bag of Monster Munch :ph43r: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Y'know, there's something many folk forget; when folk sue papers, and they didn't make the comment, the papers almost always settle out of court.Usually, if they don't sue or take it up with their lawyer, it's because they have a genuine case to answer.But the fact Hartley took this up with his lawyer supports the notion that he simply did not say it. And bear in mind it was WELL before he was linked to us.Yes, he's a Celtic supporter, but I STRONGLY doubt he'd insult his close friend Barry Ferguson in this way.I wish folk would look at the evidence, rather than being blinded by their own prejudices. Yes Danny...the papers reported that he was taking it up with his lawyer...But if he did...that lawyer never made any representation to the individual who unearthed the original article...and that is fact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 My feeling is that those who let it be known that they are taking it up with their lawyers are usually 100% guilty.Those who are innocent usually just go ahead and sue without letting anything be known.I hear Boyd is taking Le Guen's comments up with his lawyers, I'll bet a million quid nothing further happens on that front.Boydy is thinking about it over a pint of Tennants and a bag of Monster Munch :ph43r: Ah, the humour is returning! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 54,447 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 if celtic end up puttin a bid in for him he will go there a wouldnt take it to serious because a dnt see it happeninThat's what the media are saying about nearly every player we are linked with at the moment. It's just there way of trying to show just how poor we are and how much turmoil we are in while selling papers at the same time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Y'know, there's something many folk forget; when folk sue papers, and they didn't make the comment, the papers almost always settle out of court.Usually, if they don't sue or take it up with their lawyer, it's because they have a genuine case to answer.But the fact Hartley took this up with his lawyer supports the notion that he simply did not say it. And bear in mind it was WELL before he was linked to us.Yes, he's a Celtic supporter, but I STRONGLY doubt he'd insult his close friend Barry Ferguson in this way.I wish folk would look at the evidence, rather than being blinded by their own prejudices.Yes Danny...the papers reported that he was taking it up with his lawyer...But if he did...that lawyer never made any representation to the individual who unearthed the original article...and that is fact. Fact?By fact, that forces the conclusion you can back this up.Feel free Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeAndMyWeePalJoe 17 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 My feeling is that those who let it be known that they are taking it up with their lawyers are usually 100% guilty.Those who are innocent usually just go ahead and sue without letting anything be known.I hear Boyd is taking Le Guen's comments up with his lawyers, I'll bet a million quid nothing further happens on that front. Objection your Honour! Conjecture!Sustained! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Y'know, there's something many folk forget; when folk sue papers, and they didn't make the comment, the papers almost always settle out of court.Usually, if they don't sue or take it up with their lawyer, it's because they have a genuine case to answer.But the fact Hartley took this up with his lawyer supports the notion that he simply did not say it. And bear in mind it was WELL before he was linked to us.Yes, he's a Celtic supporter, but I STRONGLY doubt he'd insult his close friend Barry Ferguson in this way.I wish folk would look at the evidence, rather than being blinded by their own prejudices.Yes Danny...the papers reported that he was taking it up with his lawyer...But if he did...that lawyer never made any representation to the individual who unearthed the original article...and that is fact. Fact?By fact, that forces the conclusion you can back this up.Feel free Happy to....The Bear who unearthed it is a personal friend of mine....if you still wish to doubt..perhaps Alba will verify. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 I'm not Hartley's biggest fan but personally I think its time to forgive.Does he not have to earn our forgiveness though? If I called someone a bastard I'd expect to have to earn their forgiveness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,260 Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 I didn't want him to come purely for football reeasons, as I think he is overrated and rarely puts in a 90 minutes shift.Ok, he is miles better than Rae and Adam but I don,t think he would give a decent return unless we could get him for free like his last 3 clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Happy to....The Bear who unearthed it is a personal friend of mine....if you still wish to doubt..perhaps Alba will verify. Yes, you've not even vaguely backed it up.I don't work with speculation or claims. Only fact.No disrespect intended.Prove your point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
True_Blue_Gal 0 Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 I am not pelased we are getting cause i think his attitude is a disgrace. If he is a good addition to the team all is forgotten Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Here's a thought is Hartley ,Barry replacement? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts